Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Contract extension AIP bullet points >

Contract extension AIP bullet points

Search
Notices

Contract extension AIP bullet points

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2015, 06:33 PM
  #431  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Sunvox....are you off your meds again? Are we to expect the big apology like the last time you showed your a$$? . Just wondering
jsled is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 07:41 PM
  #432  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lerxst's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: B777 CA - SFO
Posts: 728
Default

Originally Posted by jsled View Post
Sunvox....are you off your meds again? Are we to expect the big apology like the last time you showed your a$$? . Just wondering

No kiddin, Sled! Joe comes in swingin a pretty big d**k around today. Don't worry though, he says he's smarter than 99 outta 100 of us mere guppy mouth breathers. Maybe you're that lucky one! That'd be sweet...
Lerxst is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 08:04 PM
  #433  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: backseat
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
Aloha Airlines emerged from Chapter 11 in February 2006 and ceased operations just two years later. What a great example of how to expertly use leverage. I would be interested to read the HBS case study on this remarkable labor tactic.
The 2006 BK case had nothing to do with what killed Aloha in 2008.
The post above stated why would you strike during bankruptcy. because if you know anything about US bankruptcy law, you would know a union has almost zero leverage during BK and showing you are willing to strike was a way to get leverage. Anyone at ALPA National that worked the case will tell you the strategy worked as planned. No one knows if a majority of AQ pilots would have really striked, but they made the Company believe they would and the Company backed down.

Perhaps you would like to find out how you were played in the UAL BK.
Watch this video:
news + public affairs player: video

here are a few wonderful quotes from it:

GLENN TILTON, CEO, United Airlines: Everybody knows, I think, Chapter 11 serves a useful purpose. That's why the statute exists. It's there for companies to take advantage of when the occasion presents itself.

....

WILLIAM A. BRANDT, Jr.: Because Mr. Tilton was brought in to do what the board and previous management didn't have the guts to do.

HEDRICK SMITH: Which was?

WILLIAM A. BRANDT, Jr.: Take it through bankruptcy and clean it up and confront the unions.

...
JAMES H.M. SPRAYREGEN: I would say that Chapter 11 has become somewhat of a more accepted strategic tool than just companies filing who are about to go out of business, or something like that. And as a result, there is more use of Chapter 11 now than probably 20 years ago.

HEDRICK SMITH: Over time, sophisticated lawyers and financial insiders figured out how to game the bankruptcy law. Their strategy enables companies like United to walk away from costly pension obligations.

...
JAMES H.M. SPRAYREGEN: It may have been, you know, intellectually obvious, but coming up with a process by which to handle adjusting expectations so people would buy into the need to address the pension issue, without it becoming a situation where we would lose what we call the hearts and minds of the employees, was a real challenge and an art.
magneto is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 03:22 AM
  #434  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by magneto View Post
The 2006 BK case had nothing to do with what killed Aloha in 2008.
Really? Aloha's cost structure that they established out of Chapter 11 had nothing to do with them liquidating two years later?

Originally Posted by magneto View Post
The post above stated why would you strike during bankruptcy. because if you know anything about US bankruptcy law, you would know a union has almost zero leverage during BK and showing you are willing to strike was a way to get leverage. Anyone at ALPA National that worked the case will tell you the strategy worked as planned. No one knows if a majority of AQ pilots would have really striked, but they made the Company believe they would and the Company backed down.
Ever heard of winning the battle and losing the war?

Each case has individual circumstances. In United's case the other majors were actually lobbying against UAL getting ATSB loan guarantees and doing everything they could to push UAL out of business to fix their own problems. When it became obvious United wasn't going to liquidate NWA and DAL filed also.

I will agree that UAL's Master Chairman got completely played by Tilton in BK on the first round of cuts, and they were far too compliant early on which makes a strike strategy nothing but academic. It wasn't going to happen with that gang or the United pilot group for that matter and by the second round of cuts it was too late.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 04:41 AM
  #435  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gofastmopar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: B756 Capt Junior Lineholder
Posts: 136
Default

Sunvox,
Thank you for your effort in doing the math, I was waiting for it...
I have to agree with you, and when given the vote mine will be a resounding"Yes".
gofastmopar is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 05:09 AM
  #436  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by gofastmopar View Post
Sunvox,
Thank you for your effort in doing the math, I was waiting for it...
I have to agree with you, and when given the vote mine will be a resounding"Yes".
The only math you can currently see is the rumored pay raise. Do you have all the math facts to make a reasoned decision?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 12-08-2015, 05:58 AM
  #437  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 7
Default

This has been a fun thread to read. Surprisingly thoughtful for a pilot forum (mostly). Let's see the details when they come out. I know the topic has drifted away from reserve rules, but I'll just toss my opinion on that out there. I'm a global reserve, and yeah the rules suck hard. No improvement in this extension does not dissuade me however as I don't think much will change in section 6 either, at least for some appreciable time.
But those who say screw the reserves, screw the LOA25 victims should realize that taking care of each other is the foundation of unionism. Not taking care of each other is what has created an atmosphere of distrust among subsets of pilot groups. Let's not do the devil's work for him, so to speak.
WhiskeyJet is offline  
Old 12-08-2015, 06:36 AM
  #438  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyJet View Post
This has been a fun thread to read. Surprisingly thoughtful for a pilot forum (mostly). Let's see the details when they come out.
I agree. Here is a thought provoking post from the other forum that I think frames the issues well.

Negotiating environment:
• Company ability to pay:
o Unprecedented and growing company profits,
o Unprecedented and growing industry profits,
o Unprecedented financial stability for the company and industry,
• General case for improvements:
o Unprecedented low pilot share of revenue,
o Shrinking pilot share (revenue growth outpacing wage growth),
o Tightening pilot labor pool,
o Shared sacrifice, shared rewards
• Political environment:
o Trending political recognition that labor should have a larger share
• Motivation:
o Labor peace,
o FRMS,
o MOU22 replacement,
o Scope choke

Discussion:
• Does the AIP reflect full value for the conditions?
• Should the company receive a discount for early agreement? If so, how much?
• Windows close?
• Should the AIP be weighed differently than an extension achieved through full Section 6?
• Should the AIP be accepted as an adequate step in a broader strategy?
Flytolive is offline  
Old 12-08-2015, 04:27 PM
  #439  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
I agree. Here is a thought provoking post from the other forum that I think frames the issues well.

Negotiating environment:
• Company ability to pay:
o Unprecedented and growing company profits,
o Unprecedented and growing industry profits,
o Unprecedented financial stability for the company and industry,
• General case for improvements:
o Unprecedented low pilot share of revenue,
o Shrinking pilot share (revenue growth outpacing wage growth),
o Tightening pilot labor pool,
o Shared sacrifice, shared rewards
• Political environment:
o Trending political recognition that labor should have a larger share
• Motivation:
o Labor peace,
o FRMS,
o MOU22 replacement,
o Scope choke

Discussion:
• Does the AIP reflect full value for the conditions?
• Should the company receive a discount for early agreement? If so, how much?
• Windows close?
• Should the AIP be weighed differently than an extension achieved through full Section 6?
• Should the AIP be accepted as an adequate step in a broader strategy?
There is not now, nor has there ever been, industry stability. Our industry moves to the whims of the economy. Our current economic environment is transitory.

The current shortage of pilots will be extremely short lived. There are tens of thousands of english speaking pilots from other countries. Converting a license to an FAA license is a piece of cake. The regionals are just figuring this out, but the aforementioned pilots won't come to work for Mesa. They will come to work for us.

We need to keep our heads about us now that we are living in the boom times. A boom is just that. A short lived impulse.
Probe is offline  
Old 12-08-2015, 04:57 PM
  #440  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

This stuff goes on and on and on...

The only real issue here is this:

If we say NO to the AIP will it pay off in the future?

Is there a nice fat turkey in the bush and is this current bird in our collective hands only a dove with a quarter sized piece f meat?
Regularguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Mitch Rapp05
United
49
11-22-2013 07:13 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM
Sir James
Major
27
07-13-2006 12:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices