What are the concessions
#22
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
So by your own admission in your post, you are assuming section 6 will take 3 years, so how do you think things will look in 2019? In the meantime you're giving up a BILLION in wages to the pilot group over that 3 years. So you have to start there to even break even
#23
Line Holder
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
So by your own admission in your post, you are assuming section 6 will take 3 years, so how do you think things will look in 2019? In the meantime you're giving up a BILLION in wages to the pilot group over that 3 years. So you have to start there to even break even
#24
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Actually the thread topic is what are the concessions from the two pre merger contracts that are found in C2012. C2012 has been labeled as concessionary and I am looking for details on why. So far the only items are vacation drops and increased medical. What else did we give back that we once had?
#25
Banned
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Do you every go outside the cave? Obamacare has no direct or indirect impact on you over 65 retired people.
Medicare is paid by all people on Social Security and over 65. When you speak of supplemental insurance, there are many choices to be made depending on your perceived need and ability to pay. It sounds like you're staying with the United policy that brings you up to the protection of the active employee. If anything, it is the active employees subsidizing you a retiree.
You really need to talk to other retirees or maybe a R&I guy that will give you the time. There is a wealth of knowledge/experiences to be had you just need to ask the right people. How far past 65 are you?
Medicare is paid by all people on Social Security and over 65. When you speak of supplemental insurance, there are many choices to be made depending on your perceived need and ability to pay. It sounds like you're staying with the United policy that brings you up to the protection of the active employee. If anything, it is the active employees subsidizing you a retiree.
You really need to talk to other retirees or maybe a R&I guy that will give you the time. There is a wealth of knowledge/experiences to be had you just need to ask the right people. How far past 65 are you?
Supplementals are group products and open market, paid by the individual in addition to medicare. You bet your sweet, ignorant a** Obamacare affects the price of the existing premium...those insurance companies are now required federally to make a market for high risk individuals and families. You are truly an idiot.
Medicare has been around a long time before Obamacare. If you would, please tell us what year you got a Medicare premium bump due to Obamacare?
As far as the Supplemental policies offered by United they were and are designed to offer coverage when combined with Medicare to make it similar to active employees.
You should at least read or watch the information Greene has put out concerning retirement. If you can't the find ALPA retirement video on Skynet/Flyingtogether post back and I'll get a link for you. There may even be a power-point presentation out there.
I really mean no disrespect but YOU ARE RETIRED. Maybe you should spend more time learning how to retire.
#26
Don't say Guppy
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Actually the thread topic is what are the concessions from the two pre merger contracts that are found in C2012. C2012 has been labeled as concessionary and I am looking for details on why. So far the only items are vacation drops and increased medical. What else did we give back that we once had?
Please, anyone, please list the things that went downhill, for either pilot group, with C2012.
#27
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 709
Likes: 6
From: 320 Captain
Reserve short call out reduced on the UAL side from an unwritten 4 hours to push to the 2+30 to show. So a loss of 30 mins and now codified.
The FIFO list and monthly calendar transparency.
No credit for Field standby.
Anything having to do with CCS. Hard to believe that Unimatic was more functional.
The need to verify trips domestically (saved from doing this thanks to FAR117, but it's still in the contract, 5-E-2-a)
Getting paid correctly. The whole concept of having a "file a pay claim" process just validates that payroll is messed up.
Non LCA Captains flying as F/O.
The Reassignment sections, 20-I, up to and including Forced Junior manning (In the contract, not implemented yet due to lack of IT capability). So convoluted and again lacks transparency for the line pilot to ensure its been followed correctly.
Just a few I can think of for the UAL side. C2012, to be fair, also brought improvements to both sides in some of those same sections.
DC
#28
Line Holder
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Reserve short call out reduced on the UAL side from an unwritten 4 hours to push to the 2+30 to show. So a loss of 30 mins and now codified.
The FIFO list and monthly calendar transparency.
No credit for Field standby.
Anything having to do with CCS. Hard to believe that Unimatic was more functional.
The need to verify trips domestically (saved from doing this thanks to FAR117, but it's still in the contract, 5-E-2-a)
Getting paid correctly. The whole concept of having a "file a pay claim" process just validates that payroll is messed up.
Non LCA Captains flying as F/O.
The Reassignment sections, 20-I, up to and including Forced Junior manning (In the contract, not implemented yet due to lack of IT capability). So convoluted and again lacks transparency for the line pilot to ensure its been followed correctly.
Just a few I can think of for the UAL side. C2012, to be fair, also brought improvements to both sides in some of those same sections.
DC
The FIFO list and monthly calendar transparency.
No credit for Field standby.
Anything having to do with CCS. Hard to believe that Unimatic was more functional.
The need to verify trips domestically (saved from doing this thanks to FAR117, but it's still in the contract, 5-E-2-a)
Getting paid correctly. The whole concept of having a "file a pay claim" process just validates that payroll is messed up.
Non LCA Captains flying as F/O.
The Reassignment sections, 20-I, up to and including Forced Junior manning (In the contract, not implemented yet due to lack of IT capability). So convoluted and again lacks transparency for the line pilot to ensure its been followed correctly.
Just a few I can think of for the UAL side. C2012, to be fair, also brought improvements to both sides in some of those same sections.
DC
FSB was 5 hrs pay, was it add pay? Nope, so if you didn't break guarantee it was a freebie too. Did it pay extra if you had multiple unused? Nope so try again.
CCS is a complete CF with it's lack of transparency I completely agree. But that was a management function and nothing contractual.
Pay issues? Not a contractual issue either. I agree it's retarded to have to do a pay claim and that there are so many needed, but show what section of the contract addresses that and what section of any old contract was better. It's a management and IT issue.
#29
Don't say Guppy
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Reserve short call out reduced on the UAL side from an unwritten 4 hours to push to the 2+30 to show. So a loss of 30 mins and now codified.
The FIFO list and monthly calendar transparency.
No credit for Field standby.
Anything having to do with CCS. Hard to believe that Unimatic was more functional.
The need to verify trips domestically (saved from doing this thanks to FAR117, but it's still in the contract, 5-E-2-a)
Getting paid correctly. The whole concept of having a "file a pay claim" process just validates that payroll is messed up.
Non LCA Captains flying as F/O.
The Reassignment sections, 20-I, up to and including Forced Junior manning (In the contract, not implemented yet due to lack of IT capability). So convoluted and again lacks transparency for the line pilot to ensure its been followed correctly.
Just a few I can think of for the UAL side. C2012, to be fair, also brought improvements to both sides in some of those same sections.
DC
The FIFO list and monthly calendar transparency.
No credit for Field standby.
Anything having to do with CCS. Hard to believe that Unimatic was more functional.
The need to verify trips domestically (saved from doing this thanks to FAR117, but it's still in the contract, 5-E-2-a)
Getting paid correctly. The whole concept of having a "file a pay claim" process just validates that payroll is messed up.
Non LCA Captains flying as F/O.
The Reassignment sections, 20-I, up to and including Forced Junior manning (In the contract, not implemented yet due to lack of IT capability). So convoluted and again lacks transparency for the line pilot to ensure its been followed correctly.
Just a few I can think of for the UAL side. C2012, to be fair, also brought improvements to both sides in some of those same sections.
DC
LUAL got more pay.
LCAL got more work rules, and QOL.
Overall, not ideal, but far from anything I would call concessionary. Calling it concessionary means we went backwards.
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 709
Likes: 6
From: 320 Captain
We didn't have SC at UAL. We had reserve. Yes 4 hrs, but there was no Long Call either. You were ALWAYS on the hook for 4 hrs. And did we get paid an extra hour after 2 days on reserve since every day was a SC? LOL
FSB was 5 hrs pay, was it add pay? Nope, so if you didn't break guarantee it was a freebie too. Did it pay extra if you had multiple unused? Nope so try again.
CCS is a complete CF with it's lack of transparency I completely agree. But that was a management function and nothing contractual.
Pay issues? Not a contractual issue either. I agree it's retarded to have to do a pay claim and that there are so many needed, but show what section of the contract addresses that and what section of any old contract was better. It's a management and IT issue.
FSB was 5 hrs pay, was it add pay? Nope, so if you didn't break guarantee it was a freebie too. Did it pay extra if you had multiple unused? Nope so try again.
CCS is a complete CF with it's lack of transparency I completely agree. But that was a management function and nothing contractual.
Pay issues? Not a contractual issue either. I agree it's retarded to have to do a pay claim and that there are so many needed, but show what section of the contract addresses that and what section of any old contract was better. It's a management and IT issue.
So those FSB lines that guys bid must have been a mirage? They paid 90 hours. And at 5 hours pay credit it counted towards your cap. Even if you didn't break guarantee, it reduced how much flying you could be assigned in a month. Do we get paid for a FSB now? Nope. Not even any credit. So how is that better now?
We had a limit on the amount if SC's under c2003. Max of 7 assigned (you could aggressive pick up more if you wanted), and after the 4th they were supposed to bypass you if another pilot in silo had less.
IT is tied in contractually via the FIFO list, and recurrent training bidding and numerous other issues. The company chose CCS even though it couldn't do it. How is it that CCS is unable to determine ones legality after training for a 30/168 issue? It currently is a pilot responsibility to ensure they are legal for their next trip because CCS can't track what DH flight home you are on.
Silly me, doing the work as proscribed in the contract, and expecting to get paid properly for it without having to hunt it down via a pay claim. But yep. That's not contractual at all.

So if it was a concession due to the BK, and it continued in c2012 it's no longer a concession?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



