Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Fleet Discussion and News >

Fleet Discussion and News

Search

Notices

Fleet Discussion and News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2018 | 06:04 AM
  #731  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Fr8Thrust
NAI does not operate a single 787; only 737s TATL from SWF & PVD. NLH operates the 787s.
Just shell companies of the parent corporation. And that parent corporation is running out of money. Quickly.
I'm looking forward to NWARF's (ticker symbol) Q3 report, to be released on 25 Oct. Based on their monthly traffic figures, their RASK for the quarter was approximately the same as their Q2 CASK. And Q3 is their best quarter.
I don't see them operating in 2019.
Reply
Old 10-06-2018 | 11:31 AM
  #732  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SUX4U
Yeah but those Trent motors on the 787 are sounding like more of a headache then RR or the airlines had planned on. Havent NAI and ANA had many 787’s grounded with bad engines?
There’s a line of 78’s in Santiago with missing engines. LAN Aircraft.
Reply
Old 10-20-2018 | 07:48 AM
  #733  
CLazarus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 976
Likes: 75
From: NOYB
Default

Originally Posted by CLazarus
I had a glance at Boeing's order site today and noticed a total of 129 737MAX aircraft still on order (after six deliveries so far). Last I remember, we had 161 total MAXes on order. So, BA seems to think we have 26 less MAX aircraft on order than what we've publicly stated. Anyone know why there is a discrepancy?
BA's website still shows our MAX order at 135 total aircraft instead 161. I'm pretty comfortable concluding that we very likely traded 26 MAXes for 9 or 13 787s (I think Sunvox once pointed out provisions in our SEC filings that allowed us to trade MAX orders for other aircraft). I know no one pays list price, but the list price for 26 737s is pretty close to the list price of 13 787s. That said, I think the reason we announced 4 787 orders in July and then separately 9 in Sep is that perhaps BA resisted all the trade ins and so we had to purchase some outright. I wonder if our announced CAPEX has changed at all, that would be a way to confirm a trade.

Anyways, I wouldn't fret about the modest decline in our NB orderbook for a couple of reasons. First, we don't need all those aircraft in short order as we keep older aircraft viable for longer (I'm starting to think 30 is the new 25). 10-20 new NB aircraft a year would cover NB growth I'd think. Second, it is not going to be all that tough to acquire new or used NB aircraft. BA and Airbus are producing over 100 NBs a month and meanwhile there are a lot of airlines out there on shaky legs that may have newer used NBs available soon at fire sale prices. Not a big need for a NSNB anytime soon really.

And yes, I'm still wondering about what is going to happen with our 350 order and the NMA vs. the 321LR.
Reply
Old 02-28-2019 | 07:09 AM
  #734  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/28/roll...797-plane.html

So much for the theory about the company getting out of the Rolls-Royce A350 contract by purchasing a bunch of Rolls powered B797’s instead. I guess we’ll find out by 2022.
Reply
Old 02-28-2019 | 09:38 AM
  #735  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/28/roll...797-plane.html

So much for the theory about the company getting out of the Rolls-Royce A350 contract by purchasing a bunch of Rolls powered B797’s instead. I guess we’ll find out by 2022.
From the article...

"The single-aisle plane would be pitched as a direct competitor to the likes of Airbus's A320 series and would likely replace Boeing's older 767 and 757 planes."

So they are going to replace a twin-aisle 767 with a single aisle plane? Plus they are going to make a plane comparable to the 320? They already do. Its called the guppy.
Reply
Old 02-28-2019 | 10:21 AM
  #736  
CLazarus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 976
Likes: 75
From: NOYB
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/28/roll...797-plane.html

So much for the theory about the company getting out of the Rolls-Royce A350 contract by purchasing a bunch of Rolls powered B797’s instead. I guess we’ll find out by 2022.
Yup, scratch that idea. Interesting tidbit from the article -

"Rolls-Royce had put forward UltraFan engine to power Boeing's new plane but in statement Thursday, the engine maker withdrew its tender stating it was "unable to commit to the proposed timetable.""

BA has been publicly "slow" to launch the NMA, I've wondered the last two summers whether an announcement would be made at Paris/Farnborough. Latest I've seen is that they may not even announce it this summer. Meanwhile, Airbus has been almost eager to announce the launch of a 321XLR to counter a NMA announcement. Me thinks BA has been full speed ahead for quite some time with a firm entry into service date in mind, but is delaying the launch announcement as long as possible to gather orders ahead of the 321XLR counterpunch (I think Airbus is launching it now anyways though). Rolls' pullout reinforces the idea of an an accelerated target date for entry into service.
Reply
Old 02-28-2019 | 10:51 AM
  #737  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 19
Default

Crazy how married to Boeing we seem to be sometimes aside from the 350 waffle - saying that, I have zero problems flying their aircraft but things like the new 321s seem to 1) check a lot of needed boxes and 2) presently exist. Can't figure out why we don't have 50+ on order.
Reply
Old 02-28-2019 | 12:34 PM
  #738  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: B777 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck D
Crazy how married to Boeing we seem to be sometimes aside from the 350 waffle - saying that, I have zero problems flying their aircraft but things like the new 321s seem to 1) check a lot of needed boxes and 2) presently exist. Can't figure out why we don't have 50+ on order.
Money alway money.
Reply
Old 02-28-2019 | 01:32 PM
  #739  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Cool

Originally Posted by Chuck D
Crazy how married to Boeing we seem to be sometimes aside from the 350 waffle - saying that, I have zero problems flying their aircraft but things like the new 321s seem to 1) check a lot of needed boxes and 2) presently exist. Can't figure out why we don't have 50+ on order.
Because we have super duper extra special lipstickalicious Guppies coming in mass...

Cheers,
Biff
Reply
Old 02-28-2019 | 01:59 PM
  #740  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default

Originally Posted by catIIIc
Money alway money.
Not certain, but I think observers here have posted that there is already a multiyear backlog of orders. If we ordered today, we wouldn’t see a jet for 5+ years.

I still think the “swap Rolls for 797” was UA’s plan. Scramble mode now.

As to single-aisle: I wonder how accurate the statement is. Every other article I’ve read says it could be a one OR two, depending on how configured.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
gooddeal
Major
25
10-18-2014 03:43 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
20
06-22-2011 06:02 AM
Sink r8
Major
27
01-12-2010 07:47 AM
Lipout1
Cargo
3
07-25-2007 07:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices