Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Investor call and fleet speculation >

Investor call and fleet speculation

Search
Notices

Investor call and fleet speculation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2017, 08:46 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CRJ, CR7, A320, B737
Posts: 229
Default

Originally Posted by ReadyRsv View Post
Coming from the regional world, United wasn't concerned with anything but being cheap. It showed.
It's going to take some time to overcome all the harm done by Smisek and Tilton, on the UAL side, before the merger.
JetPilotMike is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 04:25 PM
  #42  
Squawking 2000
 
Winston's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: Skeptical
Posts: 737
Default

Check out Kirby's comments from the ORD update in today's FOU:

What are your thoughts on small jets?

We grow the mainline by growing regional feed. Average airfare is 50 percent lower than it was 30 years ago. Regional growth will occur in smaller, underserved cities that cannot support mainline flights.

The additional feed of 15 passengers to 600 flights is the difference between world-class profits and losing money. UA shouldn't fly RJs in competitive markets. EWR-ATL was an example.

Comparing UA and Southwest in DEN: Our schedules make no sense. There is no late bank in DEN and the resulting impact for our business travelers is huge.

What about small jets being flown by mainline line pilots?

The economics just don't work right now. Nor does it work for 100 seat aircraft. We basically need to spread mainline costs over the greater number of seats in the bigger airplanes.
So much for us getting a small narrow body...

Winston is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 04:31 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by Winston View Post
Check out Kirby's comments from the ORD update in today's FOU:



So much for us getting a small narrow body...

It's funny how UAL pilots get excited about SNB on the mainline property. The rates, the scope choke, all of it was just a protective measure not a prescriptive one. The scope language is far more valuable to our careers than an actual fleet of NextGen RJs.

What am I missing?

There's nothing new here. Over the next 2 years you'll hear the management d'jour cry out about how we's be able to rule the industry if only they had scope relief. It'll have been 20 years since the RJ Exception Letter of 1998, and United Pilots are still suffering from it. I hope we don't make the same mistake twice.
awax is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 04:34 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bigfatdaddy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
It's funny how UAL pilots get excited about SNB on the mainline property. The rates, the scope choke, all of it was just a protective measure not a prescriptive one. The scope language is far more valuable to our careers than an actual fleet of NextGen RJs.

What am I missing?
Agreed!......rather invest in larger metal for mainline
bigfatdaddy is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 04:39 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 424
Default

Scott Kirby never met an RJ he didn't like

- former AMR pilot
mrmak2 is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 04:40 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RJDio's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 648
Default

Originally Posted by Winston View Post
Check out Kirby's comments from the ORD update in today's FOU:



So much for us getting a small narrow body...

But southwest makes it work with 737-700's, American with a ton of 319's, delta with 717's and cseries? And we dither in the mean time?

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 01-20-2017 at 07:14 PM. Reason: Fixed the quote
RJDio is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 05:25 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Schempp-Hirth
Posts: 417
Default

We're going to make up the difference with higher utilization. Our planes don't fly enough, speaking from a domestic perspective, no clue on the international front.
Terrain Inop is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 05:56 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by Terrain Inop View Post
We're going to make up the difference with higher utilization. Our planes don't fly enough, speaking from a domestic perspective, no clue on the international front.
What's our average daily utilization for 737 vs 320? What data are you using for comparison?
awax is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 07:13 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 634
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
What's our average daily utilization for 737 vs 320? What data are you using for comparison?
From the 4th quarter press release:

United Airlines Reports Full-Year and Fourth-Quarter 2016 Performance

Average daily utilization of each aircraft (hours)



10:06 (2016)


10:24 (2015)


(2.9)

One can use this site to see how we stack up

Airline Data Project
C11DCA is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 10:04 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA View Post
From the 4th quarter press release:

United Airlines Reports Full-Year and Fourth-Quarter 2016 Performance

Average daily utilization of each aircraft (hours)



10:06 (2016)


10:24 (2015)


(2.9)

One can use this site to see how we stack up

Airline Data Project
Wow, that's considerably less than I would have guessed. Just off the cuff I'd imagine the 787 and 777 fleets are closer to 20 hours a day (avg).

EDIT: I checked the link for wide bodies and I'm not even close. I know that every leg I fly is at least 13 hours long and the jet sits on the ramp for no more than 3 hours. That number is sure to go up when the whales get parked!
awax is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Major
180
07-18-2011 06:49 PM
jetBlueRod
Major
80
06-11-2008 07:27 AM
Diesel 10
Cargo
0
10-05-2005 06:19 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
0
07-23-2005 01:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices