How low will we go
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: F/O
Posts: 135
I’m so sick of hearing this. By the time we negotiate, everyone will be ahead of us. Why can’t we ever lead the charge? Why do we always sit back and wait for the tide to rise? I don’t want to hear “UPS is a different animal” either.
#72
maxing the min/Moderator
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,358
UPS led for years. Where were you?
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: F/O
Posts: 135
I’m simply saying resting on our laurels is going to bite us sooner or later. Pounding our chest and saying look at all the great things we’ve done in the past isn’t a recipe for future success.
edit* this isn’t an attack on the EB. It’s pointing out the sentiment some people have about how to move forward in the upcoming negotiations.
edit* this isn’t an attack on the EB. It’s pointing out the sentiment some people have about how to move forward in the upcoming negotiations.
#74
Occasional box hauler
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,692
I’m simply saying resting on our laurels is going to bite us sooner or later. Pounding our chest and saying look at all the great things we’ve done in the past isn’t a recipe for future success.
edit* this isn’t an attack on the EB. It’s pointing out the sentiment some people have about how to move forward in the upcoming negotiations.
edit* this isn’t an attack on the EB. It’s pointing out the sentiment some people have about how to move forward in the upcoming negotiations.
18% DC with cash over cap does not equal the same amount of tax advantaged savings as we are getting, but it’s getting closer and the cash over cap effectively grows the discount in our pay rates.
My opinion is that the company played the pandemic era like a fiddle. The EB had a relatively weak hand and played it ok. The Teamsters were able to make dramatic compensation gains (Wall Street is worried, which means they were good) due to the credible threat of a strike. I believe we will have to walk down the much longer path to a strike under the RLA if we are to top the legacy pay rates and make satisfactory retirement gains.
Sorry for the book
#75
While true, it wasn’t necessarily because of signed contracts.
It had more to do with post 9/11 bankruptcies at the legacies. UPS didn’t raise the bar, they just didn’t get chopped off at the knees and ended up ahead by default.
Legacies are just now catching back up to their 2000 contracts.
It had more to do with post 9/11 bankruptcies at the legacies. UPS didn’t raise the bar, they just didn’t get chopped off at the knees and ended up ahead by default.
Legacies are just now catching back up to their 2000 contracts.
#76
maxing the min/Moderator
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,358
While true, it wasn’t necessarily because of signed contracts.
It had more to do with post 9/11 bankruptcies at the legacies. UPS didn’t raise the bar, they just didn’t get chopped off at the knees and ended up ahead by default.
Legacies are just now catching back up to their 2000 contracts.
It had more to do with post 9/11 bankruptcies at the legacies. UPS didn’t raise the bar, they just didn’t get chopped off at the knees and ended up ahead by default.
Legacies are just now catching back up to their 2000 contracts.
UPS held the bar steady…which I would consider leading …and vital to the overall industry…so the pax have something to shoot for and surpass…that is what we are witnessing….its all good.
#77
Occasional box hauler
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,692
In the interest of getting the thread back on track: we are entering peak down captains by over 10% compared to last year. Obviously, it’s too late to back fill prior to peak. Do we think that management plans to go long term “light” on captains or will we see a system bid early next year to rebalance manning? My personal expectation is a June 2024 bid that replaces most, but not all, of the retirees. Any factors I’m not aware of?
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,144
In the interest of getting the thread back on track: we are entering peak down captains by over 10% compared to last year. Obviously, it’s too late to back fill prior to peak. Do we think that management plans to go long term “light” on captains or will we see a system bid early next year to rebalance manning? My personal expectation is a June 2024 bid that replaces most, but not all, of the retirees. Any factors I’m not aware of?
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 430
We are not light captains per UPS. We are operating less flights, and yes, less flights for peak, so we basically just had the realignment bid with the VTP We will see how it works out, but I don’t see any real big system bid coming up. Look at all the LCO lines this bid and see how many 757 Captains are not being used very much is a sign that we are currently overstaffed.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: MD-11 Guru
Posts: 205
We are not light captains per UPS. We are operating less flights, and yes, less flights for peak, so we basically just had the realignment bid with the VTP We will see how it works out, but I don’t see any real big system bid coming up. Look at all the LCO lines this bid and see how many 757 Captains are not being used very much is a sign that we are currently overstaffed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post