Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Leave and Early Out Numbers >

Leave and Early Out Numbers

Search

Notices

Leave and Early Out Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2020 | 12:45 AM
  #21  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OldPhrog46
Freakin' rad news! To all those senior to me, which is damn near everyone, thank you. Because of those taking an inventive line, I and many others get to keep our jobs. This shows me that this pilot group actually gives a damn about one another. Great job to all our union volunteers!
Sorry to burst your bubble but nobody did this to save your jobs. This is still the same pilot group that wouldn't give up second step for a year to save furloughs last time.

A top of scale captain is going to make $186,000/year (268*50*12+about 100 hours of vacation or more) over the next 2 years. They are still going to have they're medical paid, travel benefits, jump seating on Alaska and avoid having to operate in a chaotic mess of an operating environment. All for being on a 45-day callout for the company.

This is an example of how these kinds of deals need to be structured in order to be successful; everybody acting in their own self-interest results in the desired outcome. I have historically been critical of our MEC, but I have to hand it to the NC...they structured this perfectly. If only our government leaders could learn this lesson.

Glad everybody that wants to stay is staying.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 07:19 AM
  #22  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

When will we see the effective Base Position Lists?
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 07:31 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 579
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Imbracablecrunk
When will we see the effective Base Position Lists?
Probably with the next position bid.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 07:48 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 936
Likes: 1
Default

Then we will find out who will be sitting red eye reserve out of state. I'm grateful to be employed but just wish I could have been one of the lucky ones on 24 month leave.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 07:53 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: 737 tiller master
Default

Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
Sorry to burst your bubble but nobody did this to save your jobs. This is still the same pilot group that wouldn't give up second step for a year to save furloughs last time.

A top of scale captain is going to make $186,000/year (268*50*12+about 100 hours of vacation or more) over the next 2 years. They are still going to have they're medical paid, travel benefits, jump seating on Alaska and avoid having to operate in a chaotic mess of an operating environment. All for being on a 45-day callout for the company.

This is an example of how these kinds of deals need to be structured in order to be successful; everybody acting in their own self-interest results in the desired outcome. I have historically been critical of our MEC, but I have to hand it to the NC...they structured this perfectly. If only our government leaders could learn this lesson.

Glad everybody that wants to stay is staying.
Fist off, my hat's off to our union for a fine job. In regards to senior pilots helping junior pilots out especially when $$$ are involved, that's just wishful thinking. 99% of those who took advantage acted on their self interest. ^^^ hit the nail on the head.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 08:25 AM
  #26  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,874
Likes: 671
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
Sorry to burst your bubble but nobody did this to save your jobs. This is still the same pilot group that wouldn't give up second step for a year to save furloughs last time..
Somewhat correct but I think for some folks it was easier to leave some money on the table knowing it might help someone who really NEEDED to keep their job. Any major pilot who's had a few years *should* be in a position to take a couple years off without major financial consequences if necessary, but new-hires right out of regionals/135/91 are not all in that position yet.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 11:03 AM
  #27  
beancounter's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 393
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Somewhat correct but I think for some folks it was easier to leave some money on the table knowing it might help someone who really NEEDED to keep their job. Any major pilot who's had a few years *should* be in a position to take a couple years off without major financial consequences if necessary, but new-hires right out of regionals/135/91 are not all in that position yet.
Spot on. Most guys that have been at this a while have a healthy cushion. I took 6 mo. and could easily take 2 years if offered. I'm not rich like Carlsbad, OZ, and MEA, but I'm doing ok. I said a while ago I was hoping for the best, but feared we could layoff 1000-2000 pilots at AA. Glad to hear Alaska offered a good deal and guys took it. Still optimistic we can avoid furloughs at AA, but not looking good.
Reply
Old 07-22-2020 | 09:13 PM
  #28  
KingAirPIC's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Somewhat correct but I think for some folks it was easier to leave some money on the table knowing it might help someone who really NEEDED to keep their job. Any major pilot who's had a few years *should* be in a position to take a couple years off without major financial consequences if necessary, but new-hires right out of regionals/135/91 are not all in that position yet.

This is true. It definitely played a roll in my decision making.
Reply
Old 07-24-2020 | 07:21 AM
  #29  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
This is still the same pilot group that wouldn't give up second step for a year to save furloughs last time.
No. It is not the same pilot group. Also, a pay reduction never guarantees they won’t furlough anyway because that doesn’t solve the overstaffing problem. A negotiated staffing reduction (EIL) does because it addresses cash flow and staffing! I wasn’t here then, but I’m not going to judge the group for declining the pay cut.
Reply
Old 07-24-2020 | 12:20 PM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 7
From: A320 CA
Default

Pay cuts save nothing! This EIL stuff was the best solution for all in this scenario. If PAX numbers won’t improve than furloughs may still be on the table but it will be a No for me on any pay cut, since they will not prevent furloughs, at that point.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikea72580
Delta
5
05-30-2020 11:07 AM
gzsg
Delta
192
05-16-2020 06:23 PM
racer847
Military
7
04-10-2018 02:02 PM
Albief15
Cargo
17
08-31-2014 05:45 AM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices