Search
Notices

737 Rate Proposal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2022, 03:39 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,612
Default

It’s frightening how at every contract cycle we (airline pilots in this country) do not see how compounding inflation erodes our purchasing power. If those are the proposed rates then once again that will hold true.

No disrespect to Alaska pilots because I mean this as a whole, but we drastically need to up our asks or we will continue to fall further and further behind.

Personally here at SWA I need to see a minimum of a 40% increase on our rates over the course of our next four year contract. If that number shocks you then break it down and you’ll hopefully realize that it’s just keeping pace with the financial realities of the world.

Again, no disrespect and I hope that we can help to raise the bar for each other.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 03:46 PM
  #42  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu View Post
Everyone is trying to argue ADG vs MDG, and I say why not both?

Having a more rigs is better overall, and allows some flexibility in trip construction. Having a MDG around 3-4, which leaves the possibility open for some long, tourist overnights. And a 5:30 ADG that keeps the trip credit high.
Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
I proposed 6ADG and 4-5MCD a few posts back. Worth shooting for
737 Rate Proposal
Yes.

Be aware that some old-timers might not like rigs because the company would then be incentivized to do away with the 30-hour resort destination layovers they enjoy. Had that explained to me at a regional once
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 04:03 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yes.

Be aware that some old-timers might not like rigs because the company would then be incentivized to do away with the 30-hour resort destination layovers they enjoy. Had that explained to me at a regional once
They're still constrained by the 1 flight per day in some destinations. That's automatically a 24.

It's 100% speculation that a 3 hour min day would bust up the destination overnights. It's buying into the company line to not fight for it.
Call their bluff and get paid.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 05:08 PM
  #44  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu View Post
It's 100% speculation that a 3 hour min day would bust up the destination overnights. It's buying into the company line to not fight for it.
Call their bluff and get paid.
Yes. Just pointing it out, some may have assumed that everybody would like more lucrative rigs. I did, until it was 'splained to me.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 07:51 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Default

Here is the deal. If you fly single-aisle domestic narrow-body as we do at Alaska, there are no resort or destination etc.. layovers. Hawaii, Mexico and little third-world central american countries are essentially domestic for us. 14-16 hr layovers, calendar day mins, duty period mins, block or better and go home….This airline is now, has always been and will always be a small minded jerk-water regional..Shake them down hard while you are at work and get the eff away from them when you are off…..A new contract is not going to make working for Alaska enjoyable. The rotted culture is not going to change….Being very expensive to them will only make the hate us more….I hope our new contract makes us very, very expensive…
9mikemike is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 08:08 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yes.

Be aware that some old-timers might not like rigs because the company would then be incentivized to do away with the 30-hour resort destination layovers they enjoy. Had that explained to me at a regional once
If they love these overnights so much, here's an idea: Let's make all, or an overwhelming majority, of our trips more productive so they can go enjoy those places ON THEIR OWN TIME, with their newly afforded extra 3-4 days off per month and the rest of us who just work here to collect a paycheck can ALSO enjoy some more time off. Everyone's happy!
echelon is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 08:08 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike View Post
Here is the deal. If you fly single-aisle domestic narrow-body as we do at Alaska, there are no resort or destination etc.. layovers. Hawaii, Mexico and little third-world central american countries are essentially domestic for us. 14-16 hr layovers, calendar day mins, duty period mins, block or better and go home….This airline is now, has always been and will always be a small minded jerk-water regional..Shake them down hard while you are at work and get the eff away from them when you are off…..A new contract is not going to make working for Alaska enjoyable. The rotted culture is not going to change….Being very expensive to them will only make the hate us more….I hope our new contract makes us very, very expensive…
You sound like an absolute joy to fly with.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 08:11 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by echelon View Post
If they love these overnights so much, here's an idea: Let's make all, or an overwhelming majority, of our trips more productive so they can go enjoy those places ON THEIR OWN TIME, with their newly afforded extra 3-4 days off per month and the rest of us who just work here to collect a paycheck can ALSO enjoy some more time off. Everyone's happy!
The pilot group isn't a monolith. Some people enjoy nice layovers.

You know what really kills productivity? 3 hour airport sits because the next departure to your destination is on a E175. The segmentation and outsourcing of the route structure has done more damage to productivity than long layovers ever did. And getting a min day while you're having a Mai Tai is how it should work.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 08:30 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 186
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu View Post
You sound like an absolute joy to fly with.
Is he wrong? Sounds pretty accurate to me.
Meekrob is offline  
Old 03-13-2022, 08:39 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu View Post
You sound like an absolute joy to fly with.
Never occurred to me to wonder about it. A couple of complete strangers show up, work a 5-day and go home. Probably to never fly together again. I make a point to not pry into the complete strangers life. Called common courtesy. I do my own thing on layovers. Another common courtesy. I really dont care how the stranger flies and have nothing to say about it…As long as it resembles what the owners want. I am not an instructor and make a point of not instructing. ….I have nothing to say about whats on tv or whats on the internet or what Alaska has to say….So you know what I will do just for you. I will start asking FO’s that question st the end of the trip and I will get back to you…
9mikemike is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Major
65
08-28-2020 08:18 PM
docav8tor
Safety
8
06-04-2019 04:06 PM
SoCalGuy
United
34
07-14-2012 06:12 PM
Freight Dog
Major
61
02-26-2007 07:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices