Notices

Alaska Air Hiring

Old 08-05-2025 | 06:06 PM
  #8441  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,848
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by LumberJack
I wouldn't count on that. JCBA's can also take years.
I didn't say count on it, I just called the odds.
Reply
Old 08-05-2025 | 07:21 PM
  #8442  
LumberJack's Avatar
Coverage Award...
Community Favorite
Loved
5 Years
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 127
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
It won't take years. There is merger motivation to get this done from from management's side.
The two pilot groups also need to negotiate. I agree it seems like you all are motivated to get something done, but the contracts are different enough that there will be some hang ups.

I was mainly saying that basing a decision on the speedy resolution of a JCBA is a bad idea.
Reply
Old 08-05-2025 | 11:10 PM
  #8443  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 183
Default

Originally Posted by LumberJack
The two pilot groups also need to negotiate. I agree it seems like you all are motivated to get something done, but the contracts are different enough that there will be some hang ups.

I was mainly saying that basing a decision on the speedy resolution of a JCBA is a bad idea.
Preach!!!

…..
Reply
Old 08-05-2025 | 11:29 PM
  #8444  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 239
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
JCBA is probably right around the corner.
Bless your sweet naïveté. This is your first merger, it will take a while (years).
Reply
Old 08-06-2025 | 05:30 AM
  #8445  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 350
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by LumberJack
The two pilot groups also need to negotiate. I agree it seems like you all are motivated to get something done, but the contracts are different enough that there will be some hang ups.

I was mainly saying that basing a decision on the speedy resolution of a JCBA is a bad idea.
I would agree with both points (length and pilot groups negotiating) if we were talking CBA. The JCBA serves a bit of a different purpose. Not all sections are open. This is to bridge the gap, get us on the same page, and check a box needed for the merger process to get one step closer to completion. The CBA is really where the knuckles get busted, the hands get dirty, and we can get to work.

That being said, the sections that we do have open for the JCBA need to be industry standard or better, AND meet the needs of the pilot group. I am not familiar with the HA MEC, but I have been very happy with the AS MEC and NC. I have no doubt that both sides know exactly what needs to be done, and management knows they can't have a global airline without a commensurate contract. That starts with a JCBA and I think we see that sooner rather than later.

I think the CBA is going to drag, but that is a bridge to cross when we get there.
Reply
Old 08-06-2025 | 05:31 AM
  #8446  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 350
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by Disappointment
Bless your sweet naïveté. This is your first merger, it will take a while (years).
What JCBA took years that you are referring to?
Reply
Old 08-06-2025 | 07:25 AM
  #8447  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,848
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
I would agree with both points (length and pilot groups negotiating) if we were talking CBA. The JCBA serves a bit of a different purpose. Not all sections are open. This is to bridge the gap, get us on the same page, and check a box needed for the merger process to get one step closer to completion. The CBA is really where the knuckles get busted, the hands get dirty, and we can get to work.

That being said, the sections that we do have open for the JCBA need to be industry standard or better, AND meet the needs of the pilot group. I am not familiar with the HA MEC, but I have been very happy with the AS MEC and NC. I have no doubt that both sides know exactly what needs to be done, and management knows they can't have a global airline without a commensurate contract. That starts with a JCBA and I think we see that sooner rather than later.

I think the CBA is going to drag, but that is a bridge to cross when we get there.
Do we have solid commitment from the MEC that JCBA is a bridge? Meaning that it will have a short duration before section six is open again, and we're not going to let the company lock us down for five years?

I've been trying to pay attention and did not get that take away, but I could have missed it at some point.

If JCBA is short in duration, I do believe it will get done quickly. I may not like it for reasons previously discussed but I think if the company is interested in consummating the merger (they seem to be) and is willing to throw us a few bones, that any reasonable JCBA will pass. HA pilots get raises, and many AS pilots will think they're that much closer to widebodies.
Reply
Old 08-06-2025 | 07:27 AM
  #8448  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,848
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
What JCBA took years that you are referring to?
USA + Cactus?

Of course that's why JCBA comes first now
Reply
Old 08-06-2025 | 07:54 AM
  #8449  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 350
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
USA + Cactus?

Of course that's why JCBA comes first now
That was... 20 years ago? Lol

Reply
Old 08-06-2025 | 08:02 AM
  #8450  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 350
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Do we have solid commitment from the MEC that JCBA is a bridge? Meaning that it will have a short duration before section six is open again, and we're not going to let the company lock us down for five years?

I've been trying to pay attention and did not get that take away, but I could have missed it at some point.

If JCBA is short in duration, I do believe it will get done quickly. I may not like it for reasons previously discussed but I think if the company is interested in consummating the merger (they seem to be) and is willing to throw us a few bones, that any reasonable JCBA will pass. HA pilots get raises, and many AS pilots will think they're that much closer to widebodies.
Well, I can't speak for the MEC, but we have a CBA that opens up for negotiations soon, and potentially concurrently to JCBA negotiations if it goes that long. I don't think either party wants that. The JCBA is a bridge, just as it was with VX and AS. It is a step in the merger process in compliance with ALPA merger policy. It doesn't take away anything from the CBA and is essentially to completely separate things.

Could there be a scenario where this JCBA pushes the CBA if both parties agree? Absolutely. Is that something our MEC and pilot group would agree to? Doubtful. Again, we need to rework some pretty important things in section 6, and they aren't being touched in the JCBA. From the latest email, it sounds like things are going along in a productive manner and continuing. I expect an MEC email shortly to give their side.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
04-23-2009 01:38 PM
vagabond
Major
31
04-15-2009 08:51 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices