Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska thread for Alaska pilots... >

Alaska thread for Alaska pilots...

Search
Notices

Alaska thread for Alaska pilots...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2015, 04:45 PM
  #591  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 396
Default

Originally Posted by CassinAK View Post
It seems a huge part of the problem is a lot of the 50ish year old captains upgraded in 5 years and have almost been a captain during their entire Alaska career. Now they see the end of their career coming and only care about maxing out their pensions. They could careless about all the new hires career protection. They would rather get a pay raise even if the our flying shrunk cause once they leave all that matters is Alaska being around to pay their pension.
I wouldn't say "50ish" year old captains but more like in the top 50% of the captain's seniority list. Just like the current generation, they too feel entitled. How many times do you hear these guys say, "well, I've paid my dues too!"? Upgraded at 4 years, divorced 3 times, couple of foreclosures on 2nd & 3rd homes.... yeah, they've paid the price alright.
2loud is offline  
Old 09-26-2015, 05:14 PM
  #592  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB View Post
Add the additional THIRTY large RJs coming and right there is your job disappearance. Those jets ought to be flown by Alaska pilots. Period.
Amen. They my be ERJ 175s now, but its a short step to an ERJ 190/195. And those jets have almost the same seating capacity as the old 737-200. They absolutely should be flown by Alaska mainline pilots at Alaska mainline wages/work rules.

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit View Post
Baja my brother.....It is a shame that you had to leave Alaskans world for Widget world to find brothers and sisters with ballz....
You said a mouthful right there. True, dat.
Packrat is offline  
Old 09-29-2015, 10:16 AM
  #593  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gooddeal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Wicked Artsy, Moderately Fartsy
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Going2Baja View Post
You think the money grubbing fools from Angle Lake care about pilot to jet ratio's? Tell that to the furloughees from a few short years ago. You could also ask the guys & gals from Horizon that not only lost their jobs but then got to watch another airline fly THEIR jets on THEIR routes while they tried to find new work. How much did AAG care about that?

Watch your arse - you you may be next!

Baja.
Money grubbing fools works against the pilot group too.
How much did the last Alaska TA pass by?
How many pilots picked up extra flying while pilots were furloughed?
How much open time is grabbed by pilots over vacation time?

Better yet, you left Alaska for master widget and how did that management group reward pilots on the recent TA despite all the pilot efforts?

How would I feel if I were a QX pilot watching my job get outsourced has the same answer to how I would feel if I was an AS pilot working for the 8th largest U.S. carrier and got merged/acquired by a larger competitor. Do you really believe there is one U.S. passenger airline immune to pilots getting axed or feeling the effects of seniority list integration? I don't either.
gooddeal is offline  
Old 09-29-2015, 10:25 AM
  #594  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Default

Originally Posted by gooddeal View Post
Money grubbing fools works against the pilot group too.
How much did the last Alaska TA pass by?
How many pilots picked up extra flying while pilots were furloughed?
How much open time is grabbed by pilots over vacation time?

Better yet, you left Alaska for master widget and how did that management group reward pilots on the recent TA despite all the pilot efforts?

How would I feel if I were a QX pilot watching my job get outsourced has the same answer to how I would feel if I was an AS pilot working for the 8th largest U.S. carrier and got merged/acquired by a larger competitor. Do you really believe there is one U.S. passenger airline immune to pilots getting axed or feeling the effects of seniority list integration? I don't either.
Sounds like rationalization of previous decisions, whether right or wrong. Pilots at the other 7 might disagree on merger protection over scope.
TheTransporter is offline  
Old 09-29-2015, 10:38 AM
  #595  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gooddeal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Wicked Artsy, Moderately Fartsy
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB View Post
That is exactly it. I won't disagree with perspective, but that is not where our difference lies. Outsourcing, especially of that magnitude, is most definitely, by any definition a loss of jobs. It takes the organic growth that Alaska employees have earned with their customer service, sweat, and time away from family, and gives it instead to a contractor. Those are pilots that should be on the seniority list below you and not on another list entirely.
Your right, our difference lies in which conversation we are having. I'm talking about only current AS pilots and the impact to current 737 jobs and you are talking about the impact to AAG as a whole. You could argue that how the AS pilot contract could create an umbrella for other AAG employees to work under but I hardly think the majority of pilots approach the TA with that notion in mind.
JetBlue seems to have a workable business model for narrow body/RJ operations so to think that couldn't happen with AAG isn't far fetched. But to have the current profitability of QX operations in terms of feed vs cost to an AS operation featuring E175/737 operations is not realistic either. So something has to change and I don't see an option that protects all jobs within AAG. Cricket mentioned the potential impact of E175 in relation to the ANC 737 base and that certainly is a realistic impact to AS jobs but I don't think any pilot truly believes the 737 operations with Essential Air Service has been profitable so how long does that continue unchanged? More importantly, how does the AS pilot group respond to ideas of profitable bases/operations? I'm to guess that Cricket would have ANC themed ideas (along with the rest of the ANC base) that are different than LAX pilots, etc.
This is the discussion I've been trying to have, especially in advance of the next TA...wholly with the interests of the AS pilot group in mind and without emotion or belittling.
gooddeal is offline  
Old 09-29-2015, 10:43 AM
  #596  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gooddeal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Wicked Artsy, Moderately Fartsy
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by TheTransporter View Post
Sounds like rationalization of previous decisions, whether right or wrong. Pilots at the other 7 might disagree on merger protection over scope.
I will say this: most carriers have better section 1 language than AS (WN is the best imho) but they do not seem to have less than contentious TA proceedings so scope language only goes so far in making pilots happy.
gooddeal is offline  
Old 09-29-2015, 10:50 AM
  #597  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by gooddeal View Post
If scope wasn't on the table last contract, or the previous one, I wouldn't expect to see it on the next one...even with what outcome QX and E175 flying produces.
Everything is always on the table.
pete2800 is offline  
Old 09-29-2015, 04:50 PM
  #598  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by 2loud View Post
I wouldn't say "50ish" year old captains but more like in the top 50% of the captain's seniority list. Just like the current generation, they too feel entitled. How many times do you hear these guys say, "well, I've paid my dues too!"? Upgraded at 4 years, divorced 3 times, couple of foreclosures on 2nd & 3rd homes.... yeah, they've paid the price alright.
Judging by your last few posts, you do not seem to have a very high opinion of your fellow pilots, you actually seem to hold them in very low regard...is it really that bad?
Seaslap8 is offline  
Old 09-29-2015, 04:51 PM
  #599  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by 2loud View Post
Generally speaking, majority of the people are sheep.
As for Alaskan, if you study the demographics of this pilot group, you will figure out why there are more than our share of sheep. We can count on attrition to get rid of the sheep but as you've stated, the company does a good job of hiring a new breed of sheep. This small pilot group reminds me of a bad cult movie.
..............................
Seaslap8 is offline  
Old 09-29-2015, 06:41 PM
  #600  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 396
Default

Originally Posted by Seaslap8 View Post
Judging by your last few posts, you do not seem to have a very high opinion of your fellow pilots, you actually seem to hold them in very low regard...is it really that bad?
Bad, good, or indifferent, it's reality and/or JMHO.
2loud is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
jsled
United
232
07-24-2016 09:34 AM
flapshalfspeed
Major
58
03-10-2015 02:05 PM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices