Notices

Allegiant Air

Old 08-26-2015 | 12:18 PM
  #3741  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Default

Allegiant said an inspection found that a device that moves one of the plane’s two elevators had become disconnected. The plane was repaired and put back into service.


All of the airline’s jets from the MD-80 family were checked out “to ensure the flight control systems in those aircraft were functioning properly before returning them into service,” said Kimberly Schaefer, an Allegiant spokeswoman. “All aircraft were found to be in working order.”


A mechanical failure of a related system at the tail of another MD-83 led an Alaska Airline Group Inc. plane to crash into the Pacific Ocean north of Los Angeles in 2000, killing all 88 people aboard.
So they had an elevator control surface failure, but hey, it's no big deal, right?

Step right up boys and girls, it's all fast upgrade, big money and bragging rights to your friends. Why wouldn't everyone want to apply at G4?
Old 08-26-2015 | 12:24 PM
  #3742  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Wurmy
So they had an elevator control surface failure, but hey, it's no big deal, right?

Step right up boys and girls, it's all fast upgrade, big money and bragging rights to your friends. Why wouldn't everyone want to apply at G4?
If you're saying that the airline is unsafe and you haven't submitted your resignation, you're sending mixed messages.
Old 08-26-2015 | 12:44 PM
  #3743  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MD80driver2day
If you're saying that the airline is unsafe and you haven't submitted your resignation, you're sending mixed messages.
Why are you?
Old 08-26-2015 | 12:48 PM
  #3744  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 17
From: CA
Default

Alaska was a stabilizer jackscrew failure not sure you can really say that's "related" to a left elevator boost system. Not saying this wasn't a significant issue but from what I remember of the MD-80 this would still have been a controllable aircraft whereas in the case of losing the stabilizer the airplane is uncontrollable.

We know the difference the public reading the article just thinks "the tail". Nice to see yellow journalism still alive & well.
Old 08-26-2015 | 12:57 PM
  #3745  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

How quick is a quick upgrade?
Old 08-26-2015 | 01:05 PM
  #3746  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

I would imagine an early rotation and inability to lower the nose would be a bit hazardous for my taste. Getting airborne prematurely, then stalling out of ground effect, with roll due to asymmetric elevator. Sign me up!

Kudos to the crew that quickly recognized the problem and aborted. Another one of many saves.
Old 08-26-2015 | 02:01 PM
  #3747  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by knobcrk
Why are you?
Resigning? No. I'm not saying we're unsafe on a message board.
Old 08-26-2015 | 02:09 PM
  #3748  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Off to the left!
Default

Being unsafe is one of the things in a fairly long list of reasons why I decided to leave.
Old 08-26-2015 | 04:08 PM
  #3749  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by Fetzervalve
Thanks for the update. Just confirms the shadiness I have heard about Allegiant from so many others. Sorry, but not interested in flying one of those older MD80s. The Airbus is at least 1990s technology.... I won't be SOL because I won't apply. Good luck to you!
No problem, I'm indifferent. Apply here, don't apply doesn't matter to me. I only post truth. That said the MD-80 is actually a great airplane, it keeps you engaged, is a challenge, and once the cockpit door shuts behind you the flying here is diverse and fun. Assuming you didn't just blow an engine lol.

Thanks!
Old 08-26-2015 | 04:36 PM
  #3750  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by fishforfun
The stipend is $650 for FOs $1000 for CAs in Hawaii. It's not really a seat lock but an equipment lock. It is not 100% that they will be parking the 75s but sounds very likely due to upcoming scheduled heavy maintenance. If you are on the 80 you can bid CA on it as soon as you can hold it and same for the bus as long as you are already on that plane. They will allow some changes to that but it's overtly advertised, only if it benefits the company.
Thanks for correcting me about that, as you can see I'm not on the 757.

That said, a newer 757 FO will probably never see the left seat on it, that's the most senior flying in the system. Most of those CA's are lifers. So basically, your ARE seat locked on the 757 (unless something wacky happens) for two years, most of the 757 FOs upgrade directly into the MD in Florida.

In short, your better hope you get the Airbus.

Last edited by HVYMETALDRVR; 08-26-2015 at 05:18 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM
AirWillie
Hiring News
4
11-16-2005 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices