Numbers
#61
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 269
I can usually tell if an Airbus pilot was trained in DFW or CLT. Generally speaking a DFW trained pilot is not as disciplined with SOP as a CLT trained pilot. The same goes for recurrent training. In CLT they don’t miss a thing. Most times I am corrected I did not read the SOP close enough and or it changed slightly. I like the CLT way. Very consistent.
On the big revision on the Airbus when the re-flowing of the procedures came out there was a huge change. It used to say triggers and flows will be memorized and performed verbatim. Now it says should. I think someone in DFW put that in there.
On the big revision on the Airbus when the re-flowing of the procedures came out there was a huge change. It used to say triggers and flows will be memorized and performed verbatim. Now it says should. I think someone in DFW put that in there.
#63
I can usually tell if an Airbus pilot was trained in DFW or CLT. Generally speaking a DFW trained pilot is not as disciplined with SOP as a CLT trained pilot. The same goes for recurrent training. In CLT they don’t miss a thing. Most times I am corrected I did not read the SOP close enough and or it changed slightly. I like the CLT way. Very consistent.
On the big revision on the Airbus when the re-flowing of the procedures came out there was a huge change. It used to say triggers and flows will be memorized and performed verbatim. Now it says should. I think someone in DFW put that in there.
On the big revision on the Airbus when the re-flowing of the procedures came out there was a huge change. It used to say triggers and flows will be memorized and performed verbatim. Now it says should. I think someone in DFW put that in there.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
I think I recognize your screen name as being around for awhile. Do you find that things were more standard prior to the change to triggers and flows than after, or about the same?
#65
About the same. Didn’t notice much difference but then again not a whole lot changed on the Bus compared to others. Most of what I notice are things like route verifications, cockpit door procedures, even delaying the 10,000’ chime til on approach, etc, etc. Most guys are pretty good, but its enough for me to notice. Maybe it’s from all the integrated ops/changes, and old hats not wanting to change the way they do things. Either way, whatever. Don’t care. I’m sitting in the other seat now so I run the ship how I want.
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Listen, in the last month I flew with a guy who never called for the checklist (he wanted me to "just run that thing, quit asking") even though it specifically says its the cpt who calls for the bold checklists (bold isnt correct term but I am too lazy to look up the term used).
I have never started the APU after landing, Ever, never.
Before takeoff checklist? half the guys call for it when we are #1 like the book says, the other half are waiting on takeoff clearance/or lineup and wait clearance.
HUD? Ha, thats all over the map too. Briefings prior to before start checklist? that 50/50. review of performance date? say 35%. Callouts all over the map. In a previous life I was pretty anal about stuff like this and even atc calls but I was in charge of standardization so I had to be, here? I am the gear guy. IDK, I could be a jerkoff FO and try and correct every little thing but at the end of the day it is about getting the job done with a cooperative cockpit environment. If a CPT wants to do stuff his way I am surely not going to ruin a 4 day because of it.
Al is right though, no standardized at all, maybe on paper but where the rubber meets the road? nope
I have never started the APU after landing, Ever, never.
Before takeoff checklist? half the guys call for it when we are #1 like the book says, the other half are waiting on takeoff clearance/or lineup and wait clearance.
HUD? Ha, thats all over the map too. Briefings prior to before start checklist? that 50/50. review of performance date? say 35%. Callouts all over the map. In a previous life I was pretty anal about stuff like this and even atc calls but I was in charge of standardization so I had to be, here? I am the gear guy. IDK, I could be a jerkoff FO and try and correct every little thing but at the end of the day it is about getting the job done with a cooperative cockpit environment. If a CPT wants to do stuff his way I am surely not going to ruin a 4 day because of it.
Al is right though, no standardized at all, maybe on paper but where the rubber meets the road? nope
My guess is that maybe a lot of those captains you refer to are still doing things the old school way.
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,889
Guys and gals, in the end Al Czervik does have a point in that apparently stuff is being done differently by crews. Which would indeed represent a lack of consistent SOPs. What I thought he was saying in the beginning, was that those items weren’t adequately described in the manuals and checklists, and that’s what the lack of SOPs he was talking about. My bad.
Al, thank you for keeping it professional while I went overboard.
Let’s hope these issues get addressed in the near future... standardization is safety.
Al, thank you for keeping it professional while I went overboard.
Let’s hope these issues get addressed in the near future... standardization is safety.
#68
Guys and gals, in the end Al Czervik does have a point in that apparently stuff is being done differently by crews. Which would indeed represent a lack of consistent SOPs. What I thought he was saying in the beginning, was that those items weren’t adequately described in the manuals and checklists, and that’s what the lack of SOPs he was talking about. My bad.
Al, thank you for keeping it professional while I went overboard.
Let’s hope these issues get addressed in the near future... standardization is safety.
Al, thank you for keeping it professional while I went overboard.
Let’s hope these issues get addressed in the near future... standardization is safety.
#69
With all the smack Al talks about Boeing, there is no way I would have imagined he or she actually bid to fly one. Haha
#70
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilotjay22
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-24-2012 06:06 PM