Search

Notices

Furlough Estimates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2020 | 05:54 PM
  #951  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
Yeah, we can all benefit from a union that isn't top heavy and only looks out for the interest of the most senior members. This isn't a new thing for APA. It's always been a caution regarding them long before Covid.

And yes, being vocal and expressing grievances is exactly what we should all do. It's how any democracy works from nations to unions. Telling someone "if you don't like it do something yourself" is a cheap and pathetic reasoning. By that logic we should all just roll over and accept anything that comes down our way. Maybe that's great for you. It's definitely not how the rest of us work..
Reducing AVL without reducing min guarantee doesn’t save the company any money.
Reply
Old 08-17-2020 | 06:19 PM
  #952  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Reducing AVL without reducing min guarantee doesn’t save the company any money.
I specifically asked a BOD member about this. He said that reducing ALVs wouldn't reduce guarantee, just would ensure everyone is getting paid the guarantee line value at the start of the month. I also asked how many pilots this would save. His answer: "I don't know". Then I asked about the cost associated with furloughing 2500 pilots. Once again: "I don't know".

We should have all been more vocal about this during negotiations. I personally feel like I failed because I put so much trust in APA beforehand. I won't make that mistake again. And yes, I fully plan on volunteering once back from furlough or whatever they want to call this sh## show. And in 8 to 10 years when the next crises hits our industry, and the talk of furloughs start again..I will be the first to advocate we all pull together to save the bottom guys. Hard times like this hit all of us collectively. We rise or fall together like boats in a harbor. Unfortunately the mentality of those at the top right now is a bit different.
Reply
Old 08-18-2020 | 02:46 AM
  #953  
Battlinbear's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: 2 Fan **** Can
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
I specifically asked a BOD member about this. He said that reducing ALVs wouldn't reduce guarantee, just would ensure everyone is getting paid the guarantee line value at the start of the month. I also asked how many pilots this would save. His answer: "I don't know". Then I asked about the cost associated with furloughing 2500 pilots. Once again: "I don't know".

We should have all been more vocal about this during negotiations. I personally feel like I failed because I put so much trust in APA beforehand. I won't make that mistake again. And yes, I fully plan on volunteering once back from furlough or whatever they want to call this sh## show. And in 8 to 10 years when the next crises hits our industry, and the talk of furloughs start again..I will be the first to advocate we all pull together to save the bottom guys. Hard times like this hit all of us collectively. We rise or fall together like boats in a harbor. Unfortunately the mentality of those at the top right now is a bit different.
Im with you as well. Never did anything w the union prior or w APA but this was worst thing i’ve ever seen. And i’m just talking about the damn communications about it. I got a lot of “I dont know or, or not even a response” Sure gave me the uneasy feeling that APA was WAY in over their heads w this one. But! maybe they will run this bid before AA and have the hard numbers so we can at least keep AA honest about what their plan is right.. Crickets about that question as well. As soon as I saw people who were voted out of positions back into important ones I had the feeling we would just be taken out back and shot. Down to hoping AA saves families or the govt. But, ya know everyone had it so bad before and this is just the way it goes. There is only 1 group apa looks after. And it’s the one w that SimP is apart of. He stood up, and asked to furlough more pilots than them because they are cheaper to save them. Dude was a retired g4 ckm. breath... “6 more years 6 more years..Seeing the water canons will make me shed tears of happiness.
Reply
Old 08-18-2020 | 04:06 AM
  #954  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 369
Likes: 62
Default

Did APA have enough leverage to get anything from AA? It sounds like AA said here is what we are offering. Take it or leave it. I believe this because it is very similar to the offers that other work groups received. JetBlue pilots had leverage because the company needed them to agree to the Code share. Has United or Delta decreased ALV? If the board having a 20-0 vote for the LOAs means we were lucky to get what we did. There are some very junior people on the board and negotiating committee. Call them and ask what happened.
Reply
Old 08-18-2020 | 04:47 AM
  #955  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
I specifically asked a BOD member about this. He said that reducing ALVs wouldn't reduce guarantee, just would ensure everyone is getting paid the guarantee line value at the start of the month. I also asked how many pilots this would save. His answer: "I don't know". Then I asked about the cost associated with furloughing 2500 pilots. Once again: "I don't know".

We should have all been more vocal about this during negotiations. I personally feel like I failed because I put so much trust in APA beforehand. I won't make that mistake again. And yes, I fully plan on volunteering once back from furlough or whatever they want to call this sh## show. And in 8 to 10 years when the next crises hits our industry, and the talk of furloughs start again..I will be the first to advocate we all pull together to save the bottom guys. Hard times like this hit all of us collectively. We rise or fall together like boats in a harbor. Unfortunately the mentality of those at the top right now is a bit different.

I feel the same way. My reps shot down any rationalization I tried to provide about reducing ALV, specifically the win-win scenario we as a company would be in on the other side of this. There were literally no downsides to doing it aside from pilots in a non-flying (widebody) status getting a little less pay for a few months. It really showed me the arrogance of APA and the disparity in their ranks from the average line pilot. My ideas were met with “we had the lost decade and you new pilots will have 30 plus years of high earnings and 401k contributions” etc. My response is, really?? Isn’t that what those hired pre-9/11 thought?? You couldn’t predict the future then, so don’t start now!

Anyway, APA is going to be in for a shock when we do finally get in section 6 again in a few more years. The demographic they’re representing now is far from the demographic that will be represented then.
Reply
Old 08-18-2020 | 05:41 AM
  #956  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

God forbid so much as one senior Captain potentially only make $23k one month vs $26k. Better to throw 2500 pilots out on the street. I love that Chip Long didn't play any games on the last PTT. APA has been attempting to blame management and convince us this was the best they could do. Then Chip comes along and throws shade right back.. telling us all what we already knew.

Management was willing to talk about reduced ALVs. APA refused. So here we are. And the furlough line before all of this was about 1200. Maybe 1600 on the extreme high end. It wasn't 2500. Reduced ALVs and other mitigation measures would have reduced furloughs down from 1200. Instead..APA decided to throw all 2500 under the bus and not actually mitigate anything unless senior pilots take ZTLs. Basically putting the onus of mitigation on the pilot group.

You can't make this up. It's unbelievable.
Reply
Old 08-18-2020 | 07:23 AM
  #957  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Varks
Did APA have enough leverage to get anything from AA? It sounds like AA said here is what we are offering. Take it or leave it. I believe this because it is very similar to the offers that other work groups received. JetBlue pilots had leverage because the company needed them to agree to the Code share. Has United or Delta decreased ALV? If the board having a 20-0 vote for the LOAs means we were lucky to get what we did. There are some very junior people on the board and negotiating committee. Call them and ask what happened.
It has been stated by APA that they never tried to negotiate the ALV reduction at all. So we have no idea what the company was willing to do. We don’t need leverage if it’s good for both parties.
Reply
Old 08-18-2020 | 11:08 AM
  #958  
USMCv22's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default Furlough Estimates

......filler........
Reply
Old 08-18-2020 | 12:25 PM
  #959  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 592
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
Management was willing to talk about reduced ALVs. APA refused. So here we are. And the furlough line before all of this was about 1200. Maybe 1600 on the extreme high end. It wasn't 2500. Reduced ALVs and other mitigation measures would have reduced furloughs down from 1200. Instead..APA decided to throw all 2500 under the bus and not actually mitigate anything unless senior pilots take ZTLs. Basically putting the onus of mitigation on the pilot group.

You can't make this up. It's unbelievable.
I agree that the original furlough line was said to be 1200-1600, however things have taken a bad turn for the worse since those July 2021 numbers were posted along with the Sept Vacancy. If we don't see any Cares 2.0 money I have a bad feeling that 2500 is going to be just the start. As far as mitigating furloughs, they company was not going to agree to anything that cost them more money. That being said these ZTLs are actually a huge savings to the company over the traditional furlough process....Great for them, TBD for us. The onus is on us (next generation) to break the cycle of 'sacrificing our young' just because it is part of some twisted sadistic right of passage in the airline industry. I am not advocating some socialistic pilot union where seniority doesn't matter, but rather an idea or thought that maybe we start negotiating from the middle of the list instead of from the top down....what I mean is, only about 16% or less of our seniority list is GP IV captains, and usually for only a short time, yet most of efforts at times seems geared towards the idea of everyone being a GP IV captain....
Reply
Old 08-18-2020 | 04:23 PM
  #960  
New Hire
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

I agree with Dobbs, at this point 2500 is just the start unfortunately. Which still doesn’t make APA’s agreements palatable. They bought the timeshare on the first sales pitch. Absolute morons

APA states that alv reductions were a part of a bigger ask during section 6 and that they weren’t discussed as a means of mitigation... what happened to flexibility? What happened to small ball? I’ll take a walk, a couple singles and a stolen base. We don’t need to swing for the fences every at bat.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
3raser
Cargo
21
12-22-2012 10:01 AM
DirectLawOnly
United
45
12-05-2012 05:39 AM
brownie
Cargo
201
03-05-2009 07:55 PM
E1Out
Major
41
09-20-2008 08:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices