Search

Notices

How long will it last?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2020 | 10:00 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

Without unnecessary doom and gloom just for doom's sake, realistically I see recalls starting around fall of 2021. At a rate of 100 per month, give or take..that's roughly 16 months for all furloughs to be recalled from the moment recalls begin. So about a year on furlough for guys at the top of the 1600. About 2.5 years for guys at the bottom.

Assuming we don't get any kind of stimulus, which is looking very likely at any time.
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 10:06 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
Without unnecessary doom and gloom just for doom's sake, realistically I see recalls starting around fall of 2021. At a rate of 100 per month, give or take..that's roughly 16 months for all furloughs to be recalled from the moment recalls begin. So about a year on furlough for guys at the top of the 1600. About 2.5 years for guys at the bottom.

Assuming we don't get any kind of stimulus, which is looking very likely at any time.
Different airline, but does anybody know roughly what % turn down first recall, and what % never return? I know a few at my current carrier who’ve already left permanently.
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 10:23 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
Without unnecessary doom and gloom just for doom's sake, realistically I see recalls starting around fall of 2021. At a rate of 100 per month, give or take..that's roughly 16 months for all furloughs to be recalled from the moment recalls begin. So about a year on furlough for guys at the top of the 1600. About 2.5 years for guys at the bottom.

Assuming we don't get any kind of stimulus, which is looking very likely at any time.
I'm all for healthy skepticism, but the rate of 100/mo is only applicable if you're sending all recalls through a long course again. The questions was asked and answered a few months ago. If you're only out for 1 year, the training footprint is only an additional day or two beyond the normal recurrent footprint. I don't recall how it changes after that, but the point is that it's not bandwidth limited to 100/mo if they recall in 2021.
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 11:12 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

Never mind, folks. F my life. Tweeter in chief just burned all of us.
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 11:24 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Sure looks like financial CFIT.
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 11:29 AM
  #26  
maxing the min/Moderator
20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 21
From: 757
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
Never mind, folks. F my life. Tweeter in chief just burned all of us.

Hes just trying to look relevant in any way possible.
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 11:34 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 445
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
Without unnecessary doom and gloom just for doom's sake, realistically I see recalls starting around fall of 2021. At a rate of 100 per month, give or take..that's roughly 16 months for all furloughs to be recalled from the moment recalls begin. So about a year on furlough for guys at the top of the 1600. About 2.5 years for guys at the bottom.

Assuming we don't get any kind of stimulus, which is looking very likely at any time.
wow
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 12:03 PM
  #28  
paulcg77's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: A shack in Kailua
Default

Originally Posted by jetlaggy
Hes just trying to look relevant in any way possible.
^^ This. It's an attempt to get attention in the media and change the narrative. He thinks he'll look strong/tough by doing this as a negotiating tactic; it's his style. I wouldn't say it is over.
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 12:13 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by paulcg77
^^ This. It's an attempt to get attention in the media and change the narrative. He thinks he'll look strong/tough by doing this as a negotiating tactic; it's his style. I wouldn't say it is over.
And who suffers in the mean time??? That's correct. The people.
Reply
Old 10-06-2020 | 12:14 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

We still have the separate Airline Relief Bill which has enough support in both houses to pass. So it's not entirely over for us. They just need to put this for a vote quick.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BestForward
JetBlue
14677
Yesterday 03:19 PM
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
24
11-06-2025 07:25 PM
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
TonyWilliams
Hiring News
2
10-24-2008 05:55 AM
Whacker77
Regional
40
05-22-2008 03:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices