Search

Notices
View Poll Results: Will AA declare bankruptcy?
Yes
219
70.65%
No
91
29.35%
Voters: 310. You may not vote on this poll

Bankruptcy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2021 | 09:13 AM
  #641  
Cujo665's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
They already have been populating the WOs with ex mainline people and trying to get their manuals to be like AA.
One of the three AAG regionals is already run by an AAG Corporate Officer. The other two just have their own CEO's.
The books have been slowly morphing to AA standards for decades. They're so close now that OE for an Envoy flow is pretty much airplane stuff only. Using the computer, DECS/RES, the apps, EFB, and company policy and procedure are so similar that the AA CKA say it's the easiest OE to do. Once they get the other two regionals on board it will be time.
Reply
Old 10-28-2021 | 09:42 AM
  #642  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Default

Piedmont will be closed and the pilots mass flowed.
Reply
Old 10-28-2021 | 09:58 AM
  #643  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
Piedmont will be closed and the pilots mass flowed.
Maybe I should go apply.....
Reply
Old 10-28-2021 | 10:45 AM
  #644  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 146
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
One of the three AAG regionals is already run by an AAG Corporate Officer. The other two just have their own CEO's.
The books have been slowly morphing to AA standards for decades. They're so close now that OE for an Envoy flow is pretty much airplane stuff only. Using the computer, DECS/RES, the apps, EFB, and company policy and procedure are so similar that the AA CKA say it's the easiest OE to do. Once they get the other two regionals on board it will be time.
PSA was nearly identical to AA. With the exception of anything Sabre. The easiest transition into anything I've ever done. I would guess piedmont is about the same.
Reply
Old 10-28-2021 | 01:52 PM
  #645  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
True, my use of the "b-scale" word was for effect. In reality it would be a pay and work rules increase for the regional guys..... and worse work rules and pay than current APA book. Not exactly a B-scale... but pretty close. just bump all the categories up one level creating a new Class 1 aircraft group which would be the RJ's. You'd still need a carve out for work rules on the RJ's, but not as large as some would think. Heck, with all the triple time pay going out the door now, they'd actually save money just merging and getting rid of the triple pay.
If memory serves, the Group I pay is 70 to 80% of Group 2. My educated guess is future 220-100 purchases (assuming there are), would be Group 1 (the rate of the former E195). If the 76 seaters come to the mainline, they would be at a pay rate somewhat less than Group 1. That would be more than current RJ pay rates. They would, however, have an AA seniority number. AA would be hiring directly into them. That is my crystal ball.
Reply
Old 10-28-2021 | 02:16 PM
  #646  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
If memory serves, the Group I pay is 70 to 80% of Group 2. My educated guess is future 220-100 purchases (assuming there are), would be Group 1 (the rate of the former E195). If the 76 seaters come to the mainline, they would be at a pay rate somewhat less than Group 1. That would be more than current RJ pay rates. They would, however, have an AA seniority number. AA would be hiring directly into them. That is my crystal ball.
I don't have the latest rates in front of me, but in the JCBA that became amendable 1/1/20 the Group 1 FO rates are about $40-50 below G2 rates, and G1 CA rates are roughly $80 below G2 rates. Both are well above current 76 seat rates provided you're leaving out the latest retention bonus.

That contract specifically mentions the "CS100" as G1, the "CS300" as G2. Currently now known as the A220-100 and A220-300, respectively.
Reply
Old 10-28-2021 | 03:59 PM
  #647  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 119
Default

There is no mechanism in the contract to pay something less than group 1. If an aircraft is not listed in the contract’s pay scales, it needs an LOA negotiated.
Reply
Old 10-28-2021 | 09:41 PM
  #648  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
There is no mechanism in the contract to pay something less than group 1. If an aircraft is not listed in the contract’s pay scales, it needs an LOA negotiated.
Of course, and for bringing all the 76 seat pilots aboard the mainlines, with their planes and added seniority numbers, I am confident something could be negotiated.
Reply
Old 10-29-2021 | 07:06 AM
  #649  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 119
Default

Why would we negotiate for less than group 1? We are in the process of trying to boost groups 1-5 in section 6 as we speak
Reply
Old 10-29-2021 | 07:35 AM
  #650  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 587
Likes: 53
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
Why would we negotiate for less than group 1? We are in the process of trying to boost groups 1-5 in section 6 as we speak
our Group 1 rates are dog sh#t anyways. Lowest in the industry.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aa73
American
200
10-09-2022 08:10 AM
tuktukdriver
Major
42
11-16-2013 08:29 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Major
1
10-08-2008 10:35 AM
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices