Search

Notices

Schedules at AA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2023 | 12:50 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
None of this was addressed in our current TA.

Some pilots want to fly high time, I agree with that. The difference is if you want to fly low time you can be forced to fly high. If a high time flyer receives a low time schedule that he did not bid that pilot can just pick up more time.
The new TA outline contains the following:

Add new “bid high” and “bid low” options allowing pilots to voluntarily bid outside of the LCW

Why don’t you just wait to find out exactly how this will work when the full TA is released, instead of making claims like “none of this was addressed”? I’ll explain why, because it’s your prerogative to paint the grimmest picture possible.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 01:03 PM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 87
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
The new TA outline contains the following:

Add new “bid high” and “bid low” options allowing pilots to voluntarily bid outside of the LCW

Why don’t you just wait to find out exactly how this will work when the full TA is released, instead of making claims like “none of this was addressed”? I’ll explain why, because it’s your prerogative to paint the grimmest picture possible.
I'm not going to hold my breath on the company allowing pilots to get an award below the LCW. If that language was actually good it would certainly nudge me in the right direction.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 01:14 PM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 392
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
About the LCW +/- 7 hours making it possible to build a schedule to 93 hours 4 times a year? Yes you’re right. I didn’t mean to say it’s impossible. If I did I’ll take the L. I’m trying to say that’s not what our typical schedules are or will be like.

Also with respect to averages and many pilots having high time schedules like you at 88 hours. Well then for the averages to be in the 82 hour range, do you not concede that many pilots would also have to have low time schedules as well? To bring those averages down to 82, we obviously have many pilots with 75 hour lines as well. Why not mention those pilots? See you can be pretty hardline yourself. You claimed that our new RO was actually worse because you always used non mutual decline of RO to get out of it. 10 times as I recall. I have a hard time believing you have 10 NS on you record and have never heard from the flight office, but that’s just my suspicion.

And the idea that a high time line is bad, and low time line is good is totally subjective. You might want a low time line. That doesn't mean it’s what the next guy wants.
The low end of the LCW is 77hrs this month for most bid status's in the NB. Next year that will become 79hrs. That will be the minimum so in reality even if the number 1 person you will be seeing a line in the low 80's. Over half the pilots in each bid status will be above 86 hours. 50% above 86%. With LCW's being just shy of 91hrs (90:55 to be exact), I looked at the PBS awards and a sizable chunk of pilots (@25%) were getting 88 plus hour lines. 30%. Next year that becomes 90hrs and above with minimal ability to trade down or drop coupled with anemic sick accrual means this TA is a NO for me.

I know you hate the fact that your Yes vote is now canceled out.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 01:34 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Armyguy
The low end of the LCW is 77hrs this month for most bid status's in the NB. Next year that will become 79hrs. That will be the minimum so in reality even if the number 1 person you will be seeing a line in the low 80's. Over half the pilots in each bid status will be above 86 hours. 50% above 86%. With LCW's being just shy of 91hrs (90:55 to be exact), I looked at the PBS awards and a sizable chunk of pilots (@25%) were getting 88 plus hour lines. 30%. Next year that becomes 90hrs and above with minimal ability to trade down or drop coupled with anemic sick accrual means this TA is a NO for me.

I know you hate the fact that your Yes vote is now canceled out.
And you’re leaving out the fact that 79 hour bottom of the LCW window would only apply to 4 months a year, and the rest of the year that maximum will be 75, which is an improvement from what the company can do all year long currently (77). And no, summer isn’t our only busy months.

Btw I have zero problems with your no vote. You won’t find anywhere where I try to convince someone to vote one way or another. I just don’t like falsehoods. Like when you say that Eagle pilots have priory in OUR jumpseat. Or that our jumpseat reservation system doesn’t work.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 02:26 PM
  #55  
PRS Guitars's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 4
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by jetlag q
calling out sick prevents you from non reving on that day?
Yes correct, you can non rev before you are sick. You can non rev after being sick.

Last edited by PRS Guitars; 07-09-2023 at 03:10 PM.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 02:31 PM
  #56  
PRS Guitars's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 4
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by hindsight2020
Dang, that's a lot of TAFB. Now I understand why so many in my squadron are hiding from the job on mil leave. Rank schedule arbitrage by another name.

I guarantee that anyone “hiding out on mil leave” is actually working a hell of a lot harder for a lot less money. AA QOL is far superior to any mil job I’ve ever had, but to each their own.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 03:16 PM
  #57  
biigD's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 201
Default

Originally Posted by hindsight2020
What's the accrual for junior folks (or is it the same regardless of longevity)? If it's paltry, any threats or thresholds to be aware of when having to take unpaid sick, especially while on probation? Asking for a friend who is still looking for a part time job after getting kicked out of the military.
Accrual is the same for everyone at 60 hours per year, and I *think* newhires get 30 hours deposited at 6 months in. For the time I've been here (about a decade), there's been a culture of using sick for any reason at any time without worry of a phone call, let alone any disciplinary action. I wouldn't worry even on your (ahem, your friend's) probationary year.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 03:26 PM
  #58  
Sike's Avatar
Atmospheric Penetrator
20 Years
30 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
The new TA outline contains the following:
Add new “bid high” and “bid low” options allowing pilots to voluntarily bid outside of the LCW
I will be looking very closely at the language on this when the TA comes out. Unless it's rock solid, I will still be a no.

Anecdotally, this is my 3rd 121 job and 5th flying job. The schedules here are worse than any of my previous jobs. Thirteen days off as a line holder is an atrocity at any seniority level unless you're doing day trips and live twenty minutes from the airport. Unfortunately, I think that it IS likely due to IMAX as a previous poster stated. It's that, and the fact that so many of the guys about to retire are trying to make up for being completely hosed, financially, from 2001-2016. I have friends at UA and they seem to have similar schedules, so I know that we're not alone. However, the LCCs and Delta all seem to have it better.

Last edited by Sike; 07-09-2023 at 03:42 PM.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 04:13 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sike
I will be looking very closely at the language on this when the TA comes out. Unless it's rock solid, I will still be a no.

Anecdotally, this is my 3rd 121 job and 5th flying job. The schedules here are worse than any of my previous jobs. Thirteen days off as a line holder is an atrocity at any seniority level unless you're doing day trips and live twenty minutes from the airport. Unfortunately, I think that it IS likely due to IMAX as a previous poster stated. It's that, and the fact that so many of the guys about to retire are trying to make up for being completely hosed, financially, from 2001-2016. I have friends at UA and they seem to have similar schedules, so I know that we're not alone. However, the LCCs and Delta all seem to have it better.
You’re doing something wrong, or you’re leaving out a big part of how you bid. Just looking at the most Jr bid status in the company (LGA 737 FO) the bottom line holders are 15-16 days off for July (you know a month we’re all working 90+ hours according to some). You’re absolutely leaving something out about the way you bid to get stuck with 13 days off.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 04:19 PM
  #60  
Sike's Avatar
Atmospheric Penetrator
20 Years
30 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
You’re doing something wrong, or you’re leaving out a big part of how you bid. Just looking at the most Jr bid status in the company (LGA 737 FO) the bottom line holders are 15-16 days off for July (you know a month we’re all working 90+ hours according to some). You’re absolutely leaving something out about the way you bid to get stuck with 13 days off.
I bid reserve, all summer, for this reason. And I'm not based in LGA. The junior line holders are likely getting hybrid lines, which completely skews the picture. I got 17 days off with hybrids a while ago and thought I had it all solved.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dodsqubam
Regional
24
02-19-2017 08:21 AM
NJGov
United
32
11-09-2014 04:38 AM
skylover
Regional
50
07-26-2012 07:31 PM
CLEPILOT
Major
30
07-22-2012 08:37 AM
NJGov
Foreign
5
09-26-2011 10:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices