Schedules at AA
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
None of this was addressed in our current TA.
Some pilots want to fly high time, I agree with that. The difference is if you want to fly low time you can be forced to fly high. If a high time flyer receives a low time schedule that he did not bid that pilot can just pick up more time.
Some pilots want to fly high time, I agree with that. The difference is if you want to fly low time you can be forced to fly high. If a high time flyer receives a low time schedule that he did not bid that pilot can just pick up more time.
• Add new “bid high” and “bid low” options allowing pilots to voluntarily bid outside of the LCW
Why don’t you just wait to find out exactly how this will work when the full TA is released, instead of making claims like “none of this was addressed”? I’ll explain why, because it’s your prerogative to paint the grimmest picture possible.
#52
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 87
The new TA outline contains the following:
• Add new “bid high” and “bid low” options allowing pilots to voluntarily bid outside of the LCW
Why don’t you just wait to find out exactly how this will work when the full TA is released, instead of making claims like “none of this was addressed”? I’ll explain why, because it’s your prerogative to paint the grimmest picture possible.
• Add new “bid high” and “bid low” options allowing pilots to voluntarily bid outside of the LCW
Why don’t you just wait to find out exactly how this will work when the full TA is released, instead of making claims like “none of this was addressed”? I’ll explain why, because it’s your prerogative to paint the grimmest picture possible.
#53
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 392
Likes: 6
About the LCW +/- 7 hours making it possible to build a schedule to 93 hours 4 times a year? Yes you’re right. I didn’t mean to say it’s impossible. If I did I’ll take the L. I’m trying to say that’s not what our typical schedules are or will be like.
Also with respect to averages and many pilots having high time schedules like you at 88 hours. Well then for the averages to be in the 82 hour range, do you not concede that many pilots would also have to have low time schedules as well? To bring those averages down to 82, we obviously have many pilots with 75 hour lines as well. Why not mention those pilots? See you can be pretty hardline yourself. You claimed that our new RO was actually worse because you always used non mutual decline of RO to get out of it. 10 times as I recall. I have a hard time believing you have 10 NS on you record and have never heard from the flight office, but that’s just my suspicion.
And the idea that a high time line is bad, and low time line is good is totally subjective. You might want a low time line. That doesn't mean it’s what the next guy wants.
Also with respect to averages and many pilots having high time schedules like you at 88 hours. Well then for the averages to be in the 82 hour range, do you not concede that many pilots would also have to have low time schedules as well? To bring those averages down to 82, we obviously have many pilots with 75 hour lines as well. Why not mention those pilots? See you can be pretty hardline yourself. You claimed that our new RO was actually worse because you always used non mutual decline of RO to get out of it. 10 times as I recall. I have a hard time believing you have 10 NS on you record and have never heard from the flight office, but that’s just my suspicion.
And the idea that a high time line is bad, and low time line is good is totally subjective. You might want a low time line. That doesn't mean it’s what the next guy wants.
I know you hate the fact that your Yes vote is now canceled out.
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
The low end of the LCW is 77hrs this month for most bid status's in the NB. Next year that will become 79hrs. That will be the minimum so in reality even if the number 1 person you will be seeing a line in the low 80's. Over half the pilots in each bid status will be above 86 hours. 50% above 86%. With LCW's being just shy of 91hrs (90:55 to be exact), I looked at the PBS awards and a sizable chunk of pilots (@25%) were getting 88 plus hour lines. 30%. Next year that becomes 90hrs and above with minimal ability to trade down or drop coupled with anemic sick accrual means this TA is a NO for me.
I know you hate the fact that your Yes vote is now canceled out.
I know you hate the fact that your Yes vote is now canceled out.
Btw I have zero problems with your no vote. You won’t find anywhere where I try to convince someone to vote one way or another. I just don’t like falsehoods. Like when you say that Eagle pilots have priory in OUR jumpseat. Or that our jumpseat reservation system doesn’t work.
#55
#56
I guarantee that anyone “hiding out on mil leave” is actually working a hell of a lot harder for a lot less money. AA QOL is far superior to any mil job I’ve ever had, but to each their own.
#57
What's the accrual for junior folks (or is it the same regardless of longevity)? If it's paltry, any threats or thresholds to be aware of when having to take unpaid sick, especially while on probation? Asking for a friend who is still looking for a part time job after getting kicked out of the military. 

#58
Anecdotally, this is my 3rd 121 job and 5th flying job. The schedules here are worse than any of my previous jobs. Thirteen days off as a line holder is an atrocity at any seniority level unless you're doing day trips and live twenty minutes from the airport. Unfortunately, I think that it IS likely due to IMAX as a previous poster stated. It's that, and the fact that so many of the guys about to retire are trying to make up for being completely hosed, financially, from 2001-2016. I have friends at UA and they seem to have similar schedules, so I know that we're not alone. However, the LCCs and Delta all seem to have it better.
Last edited by Sike; 07-09-2023 at 03:42 PM.
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
I will be looking very closely at the language on this when the TA comes out. Unless it's rock solid, I will still be a no.
Anecdotally, this is my 3rd 121 job and 5th flying job. The schedules here are worse than any of my previous jobs. Thirteen days off as a line holder is an atrocity at any seniority level unless you're doing day trips and live twenty minutes from the airport. Unfortunately, I think that it IS likely due to IMAX as a previous poster stated. It's that, and the fact that so many of the guys about to retire are trying to make up for being completely hosed, financially, from 2001-2016. I have friends at UA and they seem to have similar schedules, so I know that we're not alone. However, the LCCs and Delta all seem to have it better.
Anecdotally, this is my 3rd 121 job and 5th flying job. The schedules here are worse than any of my previous jobs. Thirteen days off as a line holder is an atrocity at any seniority level unless you're doing day trips and live twenty minutes from the airport. Unfortunately, I think that it IS likely due to IMAX as a previous poster stated. It's that, and the fact that so many of the guys about to retire are trying to make up for being completely hosed, financially, from 2001-2016. I have friends at UA and they seem to have similar schedules, so I know that we're not alone. However, the LCCs and Delta all seem to have it better.
#60
You’re doing something wrong, or you’re leaving out a big part of how you bid. Just looking at the most Jr bid status in the company (LGA 737 FO) the bottom line holders are 15-16 days off for July (you know a month we’re all working 90+ hours according to some). You’re absolutely leaving something out about the way you bid to get stuck with 13 days off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



