Search

Notices

Us/aa sli

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2013 | 03:57 PM
  #211  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 32
From: B777/CA retired
Default

Originally Posted by Seaslap8
I wonder if this would include "BINDING ARBITRATION"....and what would happen when someone doesn't like the outcome.
I think the answer to that is yes, it is truly binding because it will be done with the force of federal law - McCaskille Bond and not contract law - ALPA merger policy. The argument that USAPA has made is that the Nicolau was done under a union contract and not a federally mandated arbitration.

Further to that is everyone from investors to management is well aware of how this has played out at US Airways. You can see some of the vocal elements here, and you can see the vitriol. No one wants a repeat of this again. Management will insist that whatever list is produced in the SLI will be the list. Parker could have done that years ago, he chose not to do it to save ion labor costs by whipsawing the two groups. He will not make that mistake again, the stakes are much larger this time and getting the contract done first will prevent the pay/workrules imbalance that has resulted in the stalemate we have here.

I would not expect long fences, either. If the ratio is done right there is little need for fences because everyone is slotted in by aircraft type and the seat they hold going into the merger. Management wants few restrictions on their ability to shift crews around the system, moving aircraft and people to more productive routes. We will see how this goes. I am awaiting the end of the NDA and our ability to see the MOU. That will give us some indication of how management wants this process to go through and it will show us the mechanism to get one contract and the path to industry standard wages and conditions. That's the real goal here.

Last edited by cactusmike; 01-06-2013 at 04:08 PM.
Reply
Old 01-06-2013 | 04:05 PM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Seaslap8
I wonder if this would include "BINDING ARBITRATION"....and what would happen when someone doesn't like the outcome.
I'd say that according to several federal court rulings that if a majority of pilots vote in a new union AND they can get the company to negotiate a new seniority list AND the new SL can survive a DFR, then yeah, they can change it. Unless as CM says, MB has more weight since it is a federal arbitration instead of an intra-union one.

Bunch of ANDs, huh. We've been at it for 5 years now and are only through the first. I doubt we will see it repeated.
Reply
Old 01-06-2013 | 04:59 PM
  #213  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
I'd say that according to several federal court rulings that if a majority of pilots vote in a new union AND they can get the company to negotiate a new seniority list AND the new SL can survive a DFR, then yeah, they can change it. Unless as CM says, MB has more weight since it is a federal arbitration instead of an intra-union one.
Therein lies the problem in our case. The 9th says we can't even ask the question wether it is "binding" until after a contract is signed. MB says its "final and binding" but if you follow the 9ths ruling the union can do whatever it wants. Now if what the union did ends up being illegal both the union and company can be liable to the injured parties. Really a chicken/egg thing and why Silver said the 9th made a bad decision
Reply
Old 01-07-2013 | 01:44 AM
  #214  
Bringupthebird's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
I'd say that according to several federal court rulings that if a majority of pilots vote in a new union AND they can get the company to negotiate a new seniority list AND the new SL can survive a DFR, then yeah, they can change it.
Can you list the examples of when this has successfully been accomplished? Didn't think so.
Reply
Old 01-07-2013 | 03:38 AM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: AB 320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
This is far from done but it is fun to speculate. The west would like to see a relative position integration with protection on the widebody's for the Aa guys long enough to give most Aa an oppurtunity to fly the birds they brought. The east pilots want DOH and your 777 manuals ASAP
Flame Bait, not true. East pilots want their own attrition, nothing more. Cacti wants East attrition and AA widebody.
Reply
Old 01-07-2013 | 05:05 AM
  #216  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Bringupthebird
Can you list the examples of when this has successfully been accomplished? Didn't think so.
No, I can't and to be honest I never thought USAPA would get this far. But they have and we are still in the middle of a very expensive experiment.
Reply
Old 01-07-2013 | 05:41 AM
  #217  
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Bigg Bird!!
Default

Originally Posted by Bringupthebird
Can you list the examples of when this has successfully been accomplished? Didn't think so.
In past mergers, the arbitrated SLI award produced an acceptable final product, that BOTH pilot groups were willing to live with. A joint CBA was then voted on, and the SLI was then CEMENTED and FINALISED. Hence the final product of a full integration.
In our case, the Nic was so lopsided, that the ENTIRE east pilot group felt betrayed and DAMAGED!! Hence our current situation. I believe our spat will be studied by generations to come. This truly is precedent setting. This is why a final ruling is so illusive.
Reply
Old 01-07-2013 | 10:32 AM
  #218  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
You're a scab. Go away.
That is a pretty hefty charge. You got proof that he went against his union's strike?
Reply
Old 01-07-2013 | 12:59 PM
  #219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
That is a pretty hefty charge. You got proof that he went against his union's strike?
Tis that. Unfortunately it's one west pilots use every day against the east, with cacti being one of the most guilty. Have you admonished him? If so thanks from one of the most scab free pilots in the nation. US EAST.
Reply
Old 01-07-2013 | 07:02 PM
  #220  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Found this on another board and thought it was dead on.



US Airways and its pilots

In the conversations that take place regarding the US Airways / American Airlines merger opportunity, naysayers within both companies frequently end up being the pilots. The minority groups of these pilots like to ask for (demand) firm agreements on seniority integration and point to Doug Parker and his team being unable to achieve seniority integration for US Airways pilots since the America West / US Airways merger of 2005.

That’s really not true. The history there is bloody but it really is the fault and responsibility of the pilots involved that combination. Here is what has happened:

America West and US Airways pilots were both represented by ALPA. As such, when the merger occurred there was a mechanism in place at ALPA to arbitrate such a seniority integration. There were many issues but the overriding viewpoints on each side were centered around a couple of things. America West pilots felt they deserved to have their seniority (and job opportunities) guarded to some fair degree because it was their airline that was consuming US Airways which had been in bankruptcy not once but twice in the same decade. That was a reasonable viewpoint and it could have been handled by using “fences” to protect some percentage of jobs for those pilots.

US Airways pilots wanted a date of hire seniority integration because their pilot group had some very old, very senior pilots who didn’t want to be knocked down from the premium pilot opportunities. Since these pilots had agreed to major wage concessions in two bankruptcies, they felt they had given enough at that point. This wasn’t entirely reasonable but it wasn’t entirely unreasonable either.

In the arbitration discussions, US Airways representation basically went “hardline” and drilled in on a date of hire seniority integration and avoided discussing any ways to come to a compromise using mechanisms that would give each side some protection and some opportunity. Fencing routes and/or aircraft was one way this could have been handled and the most senior of each pilot group could have had their retirement protected reasonably well.

But the hardline negotiations on the part of the US Airways group led to the arbitrator having to make a tough ruling that blended each group with a relative date of hire integration. This solution had some fairly junior America West captains sitting in front of some fairly senior US Airways captains (as an example.)

US Airways pilots went livid and used the nuclear option. They held a new union representation election and formed a new independent union called USAPA. They were able to do this because they actually outnumbered America West pilots. Essentially, US Airways pilots didn’t like the binding arbitration and had a rare opportunity to stick it to everyone and did so.

This breakaway and the lack of seniority integration has been litigated in court ever since between the two pilot groups. Doug Parker and his executive team have very wisely stayed far, far away from this problem the whole time. They’re not even sure who they should legally engage in negotiations with and have (rightly) offered the opinion that the pilots had to get their act together first. The pilots have been unable to do so for more than 5 years.

Frankly, my own opinion is that a court should have made a decision that looked like this:
•The pilots may organize in any way they wish including creating an independent union. However,
•The pilots must integrate according to the ALPA/Nicolau seniority integration arbitration decision before anything else occurs. Binding arbitration that results in a decision should be enforced otherwise binding arbitration isn’t binding.
•After the seniority integration is implemented, the pilots may work out their contracts and future seniority issues among themselves and with the company leadership.

Under that scenario, no one gets their cake and the chance to eat it too.

Now, there is a reason why most pilots actually view the US Airways / AA merger as a good thing. There is now federal law which governs a seniority integration which didn’t exist when America West bought US Airways. This law works fairly well. Not perfectly but it does get the job done and that’s important.

American Airlines pilots are very senior and know that under that federal law they’ll do pretty well. If they do pretty well and the new airline is successful, their future is pretty secure and that’s what a pilot wants.

America West pilots know that they’ll do pretty well because the merger framework pretty much raises their incomes to levels never thought of before because the baseline for those wages will be AA pilot wages. Even if they lose some positions in seniority, everyone makes a lot more money. Best of all, USAPA almost certainly goes away as a union and that is an emotional win for America West pilots. (I would argue that while USAPA is pretty awful as a union, they aren’t exactly upgrading big with AA’s Allied Pilots Association.)

US Airways (Old) pilots are very senior and know that they’ll do pretty well under the federal law as seniority integration goes and they, too, get a big raise.

All three parties in this know that they don’t have to deal with a multi-year mess of seniority integration if this deal is made because the McCaskill Bond statute provides adequate framework for a fairly timely seniority integration. No union leadership in this battle has to “fight” because there is only so much that can be fought for under the law now. Notice that in the United / Continental merger there really wasn’t much “fight” between the unions as there were few areas where any “fight” could occur.

So despite the naysayers predicting a mess of seniority integration, that’s not really true. It will happen and the worse case scenario is that everyone gets a pay raise and gets a fairly secure future with an airline that can compete globally. More so, Doug Parker and his team also know this and also know that if they present a deal that gets everyone a bit of what they want in a worst case scenario, they’ll be integrated in fairly short time. They can do this deal and succeed in the labor area without much fear and most creditors know this by now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
5
03-16-2012 08:04 AM
bull
Southwest
172
07-27-2011 11:49 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 05:43 PM
Aloha
Regional
75
06-12-2010 06:15 PM
Myboyblue
Mergers and Acquisitions
8
04-29-2010 07:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices