Fleet basing post merger
04-29-2013, 12:06 PM
#31
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Originally Posted by GAPILOT36
So when could a junior F/O either side AA/US expect a narrow body upgrade? Realistically...?
I think eaglefly might be sorely disappointed with his suggested SLI methods.
04-29-2013, 04:21 PM
#32
Flies With The Hat On
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Everyone at US can expect NB upgrade in 5 years. Access to widebody within 3.
I think eaglefly might be sorely disappointed with his suggested SLI methods.
I think eaglefly might be sorely disappointed with his suggested SLI methods.
a319 upgrade may drop to 5 years soon.
e190 upgrade may drop to 2 years soon.
04-29-2013, 04:39 PM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Originally Posted by eaglefly
I understand some at U are drooling uncontrollably................
04-30-2013, 02:11 AM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: AB 320 Captain
Posts: 355
With all the BS that is being posted. Here is some more:
USAPA for starters should show a copy of the TWA staple arguments. The reasoning for the staple was "TWA was a failing carrier and belongs on the bottom." AA is now the failing carrier and the AWA pilots rescued them. Because AWA rescued them they deserve super seniority.
DOH with fences maybe looking better all the time.
USAPA for starters should show a copy of the TWA staple arguments. The reasoning for the staple was "TWA was a failing carrier and belongs on the bottom." AA is now the failing carrier and the AWA pilots rescued them. Because AWA rescued them they deserve super seniority.
DOH with fences maybe looking better all the time.
04-30-2013, 05:49 AM
#35
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Everyone at US can expect NB upgrade in 5 years. Access to widebody within 3.
I think eaglefly might be sorely disappointed with his suggested SLI methods.
I think eaglefly might be sorely disappointed with his suggested SLI methods.
04-30-2013, 05:51 AM
#36
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by R57 relay
There it is, I was wondering how long it would take before the BS started. I haven't seen anyone drooling over your stuff. Along with it comes JFK, DFW, ORD and MIA. Yea!
Just ran through this thread from the start and count a half dozen alone right here. Don't worry though, when the Nic hits the table in arbitration, it prolly won't hurt you too bad.
04-30-2013, 07:12 AM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Originally Posted by eaglefly
LOL !
Just ran through this thread from the start and count a half dozen alone right here. Don't worry though, when the Nic hits the table in arbitration, it prolly won't hurt you too bad.
Just ran through this thread from the start and count a half dozen alone right here. Don't worry though, when the Nic hits the table in arbitration, it prolly won't hurt you too bad.
I don't think you can make proclamations about fences until you see what the SLI looks like. Then the fences should prohibit anyone from getting a windfall at the expense of others. Something Nic didn't do.
And BTW, starting the SLI with AA with the Nic wouldn't hurt me too bad. Sorry to disappoint.
Pilots never learn from their mistakes. Crap like "drooling" needs to be left our of the discussion because I'm not drooling over any bases or equipment you guys brought to the merger. I'd be just happy with the progression I would have at US, Nic or not. All comments like that do is make the business of a SLI personal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
