JCBA timeline extension
#423
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Good analysis from both sides of the argument. It would be so nice if management dealt with us in the same civilized manner we generally do them.
That will never happen. Instead we are continually making assumptions on what might or might not happen grasping for straws. My experience tells me Parker won't move from his proposal, our BOD won't move from their counter, and we the line pilots begrudgingly live with the results, the MOU with a Few small inconsequential modifications. IMO, the company wins and pats us on the back for our efforts. Been there, done that. It's definitely not fair but who cares? Profits should keep tumbling in, share prices go up, and the paying passenger comes to accept lack luster service from employees of the airline.
Do not be surprised that very little will change from today. Take care of yourself, your crew, and go home trying not to dwell on the bad parts of the job and industry. That's all...
That will never happen. Instead we are continually making assumptions on what might or might not happen grasping for straws. My experience tells me Parker won't move from his proposal, our BOD won't move from their counter, and we the line pilots begrudgingly live with the results, the MOU with a Few small inconsequential modifications. IMO, the company wins and pats us on the back for our efforts. Been there, done that. It's definitely not fair but who cares? Profits should keep tumbling in, share prices go up, and the paying passenger comes to accept lack luster service from employees of the airline.
Do not be surprised that very little will change from today. Take care of yourself, your crew, and go home trying not to dwell on the bad parts of the job and industry. That's all...
#424
That's fine, I'm not trying to convince you of anything, simply telling you where I'm at and the way I see it. As far as scope, look where the regional industry is going. Parker will be lucky to put half the large RJ's he wants in operation over the next 5 years and the smaller ones will never be ordered again. I don't see why that was your big ticket item anyway......it was a smokescreen designed to be plucked all along.
I generally agree with most of what you are saying. All good stuff and I"m trying to think of the other side of the coin if we do go into arb.
As much as I would like to believe what you say about RJ's being staffed we are always just one FAA rule change away from the landscape being dramatically changed. I have no issue with scope..lets just keep it inline with our other legacy competitors. I do agree I feel it was a Red Herring and it did a great job of keeping the pilot group focused on it while we get slighted with all the other bad parts of the offer. Were you in favor of giving them the 81 seat limit? I can't remember if you mentioned this previously.
Overall it does seem like the company is still actively negotiating and trying to do their road show to get a gauge on what we will and will not take as a group. I'm glad to see that we are somewhat effective as they both mentioned in the DFW crew news that they received emails and also heard us on the scope issue. Unity is is our biggest leverage during all of this.
Hopefully our NC takes the time to be persistent and get us what we all deserve.
#425
Schnurman: Union trouble at American Airlines? Say it ain?t so | Dallas Morning News
Check this article out. He makes it sound like pilots are greedy. However, he does make a good point that if we don't take the last, best offer, we will lose royally in arbitration. I don't want to make the same mistake the FA's did.
Check this article out. He makes it sound like pilots are greedy. However, he does make a good point that if we don't take the last, best offer, we will lose royally in arbitration. I don't want to make the same mistake the FA's did.
#426
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
eaglefly,
I generally agree with most of what you are saying. All good stuff and I"m trying to think of the other side of the coin if we do go into arb.
As much as I would like to believe what you say about RJ's being staffed we are always just one FAA rule change away from the landscape being dramatically changed. I have no issue with scope..lets just keep it inline with our other legacy competitors. I do agree I feel it was a Red Herring and it did a great job of keeping the pilot group focused on it while we get slighted with all the other bad parts of the offer. Were you in favor of giving them the 81 seat limit? I can't remember if you mentioned this previously.
Overall it does seem like the company is still actively negotiating and trying to do their road show to get a gauge on what we will and will not take as a group. I'm glad to see that we are somewhat effective as they both mentioned in the DFW crew news that they received emails and also heard us on the scope issue. Unity is is our biggest leverage during all of this.
Hopefully our NC takes the time to be persistent and get us what we all deserve.
I generally agree with most of what you are saying. All good stuff and I"m trying to think of the other side of the coin if we do go into arb.
As much as I would like to believe what you say about RJ's being staffed we are always just one FAA rule change away from the landscape being dramatically changed. I have no issue with scope..lets just keep it inline with our other legacy competitors. I do agree I feel it was a Red Herring and it did a great job of keeping the pilot group focused on it while we get slighted with all the other bad parts of the offer. Were you in favor of giving them the 81 seat limit? I can't remember if you mentioned this previously.
Overall it does seem like the company is still actively negotiating and trying to do their road show to get a gauge on what we will and will not take as a group. I'm glad to see that we are somewhat effective as they both mentioned in the DFW crew news that they received emails and also heard us on the scope issue. Unity is is our biggest leverage during all of this.
Hopefully our NC takes the time to be persistent and get us what we all deserve.
#427
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Schnurman: Union trouble at American Airlines? Say it ain?t so | Dallas Morning News
Check this article out. He makes it sound like pilots are greedy. However, he does make a good point that if we don't take the last, best offer, we will lose royally in arbitration. I don't want to make the same mistake the FA's did.
Check this article out. He makes it sound like pilots are greedy. However, he does make a good point that if we don't take the last, best offer, we will lose royally in arbitration. I don't want to make the same mistake the FA's did.
#428
#429
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,591
Likes: 351
Delta's retirement contribution is 15 percent. There is no match. It's simple now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



