Search

Notices

JCBA timeline extension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:28 PM
  #421  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: B-757/767 Capt.
Default

Why can't pay be proposed or negotiated to match The Delta / United average adjusting throughout the contract where ours is adjusted whenever there is a change in their average?
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:30 PM
  #422  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: AA
Default

According to APC Delta's 401k contribution is only 2%, plus matching. Is this true?

It also says they get a 3% raise in 2015. So we'd stay above them by 3%, but not 6-7% as some have mentioned.
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:33 PM
  #423  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TRZ06
Good analysis from both sides of the argument. It would be so nice if management dealt with us in the same civilized manner we generally do them.
That will never happen. Instead we are continually making assumptions on what might or might not happen grasping for straws. My experience tells me Parker won't move from his proposal, our BOD won't move from their counter, and we the line pilots begrudgingly live with the results, the MOU with a Few small inconsequential modifications. IMO, the company wins and pats us on the back for our efforts. Been there, done that. It's definitely not fair but who cares? Profits should keep tumbling in, share prices go up, and the paying passenger comes to accept lack luster service from employees of the airline.
Do not be surprised that very little will change from today. Take care of yourself, your crew, and go home trying not to dwell on the bad parts of the job and industry. That's all...
Good advice. Ultimately, it will come down to a BOD vote and majority rules. With no further movement by Parker, I'm at peace with arbitration. I've looked at the MOU rates and we won't be a Delta, but AA won't be a Delta product either. Yes, APA and AA pilots screwed up giving the keys to AA to someone who clearly won't change the culture and thus will never turn it around. In that the APA must be embarrassed and that Im sure is one of their internal conundrums (including giving up profit-sharing for a measly 26 million). But these profits won't last.....in this cyclical business, they never do. In the bad times, I hope Parker remembers what has happened now, because it's a sure bet the employees will. It will be interesting to see how Parker deals with future bad times without the goodwill of front-line employees. That's what a Delta is getting right now that isn't so obvious..........flexibility, cooperation and goodwill in the future when it's really needed.
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:34 PM
  #424  
Diesel1030's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: A terminal bum
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
That's fine, I'm not trying to convince you of anything, simply telling you where I'm at and the way I see it. As far as scope, look where the regional industry is going. Parker will be lucky to put half the large RJ's he wants in operation over the next 5 years and the smaller ones will never be ordered again. I don't see why that was your big ticket item anyway......it was a smokescreen designed to be plucked all along.
eaglefly,
I generally agree with most of what you are saying. All good stuff and I"m trying to think of the other side of the coin if we do go into arb.

As much as I would like to believe what you say about RJ's being staffed we are always just one FAA rule change away from the landscape being dramatically changed. I have no issue with scope..lets just keep it inline with our other legacy competitors. I do agree I feel it was a Red Herring and it did a great job of keeping the pilot group focused on it while we get slighted with all the other bad parts of the offer. Were you in favor of giving them the 81 seat limit? I can't remember if you mentioned this previously.

Overall it does seem like the company is still actively negotiating and trying to do their road show to get a gauge on what we will and will not take as a group. I'm glad to see that we are somewhat effective as they both mentioned in the DFW crew news that they received emails and also heard us on the scope issue. Unity is is our biggest leverage during all of this.

Hopefully our NC takes the time to be persistent and get us what we all deserve.
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:36 PM
  #425  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Schnurman: Union trouble at American Airlines? Say it ain?t so | Dallas Morning News

Check this article out. He makes it sound like pilots are greedy. However, he does make a good point that if we don't take the last, best offer, we will lose royally in arbitration. I don't want to make the same mistake the FA's did.
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:39 PM
  #426  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel1030
eaglefly,
I generally agree with most of what you are saying. All good stuff and I"m trying to think of the other side of the coin if we do go into arb.

As much as I would like to believe what you say about RJ's being staffed we are always just one FAA rule change away from the landscape being dramatically changed. I have no issue with scope..lets just keep it inline with our other legacy competitors. I do agree I feel it was a Red Herring and it did a great job of keeping the pilot group focused on it while we get slighted with all the other bad parts of the offer. Were you in favor of giving them the 81 seat limit? I can't remember if you mentioned this previously.

Overall it does seem like the company is still actively negotiating and trying to do their road show to get a gauge on what we will and will not take as a group. I'm glad to see that we are somewhat effective as they both mentioned in the DFW crew news that they received emails and also heard us on the scope issue. Unity is is our biggest leverage during all of this.

Hopefully our NC takes the time to be persistent and get us what we all deserve.
What particular FAA rule change do you think will change the "landscape" ?
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:43 PM
  #427  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Schnurman: Union trouble at American Airlines? Say it ain?t so | Dallas Morning News

Check this article out. He makes it sound like pilots are greedy. However, he does make a good point that if we don't take the last, best offer, we will lose royally in arbitration. I don't want to make the same mistake the FA's did.
I would expect nothing different from Schnurman. In fact, I'm surprised it took him so long to concoct another one of his hideously biased hatchet pieces. This clown is a well known anti-union hack and rarely misses an opportunity to attack AA's unions. He's a "commentator" who writes a "column" and thus truth, accuracy, neutrality and objectivity aren't required of him like they would real reporters writing news stories. He has a pulpit, that's all.
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:50 PM
  #428  
Diesel1030's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: A terminal bum
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
What particular FAA rule change do you think will change the "landscape" ?
The continued lobbying of airlines to change the ATP requirements etc. That alone changes their "shortage".
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 04:54 PM
  #429  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,591
Likes: 351
Default

Originally Posted by Surprise
According to APC Delta's 401k contribution is only 2%, plus matching. Is this true?

It also says they get a 3% raise in 2015. So we'd stay above them by 3%, but not 6-7% as some have mentioned.
Delta's retirement contribution is 15 percent. There is no match. It's simple now.
Reply
Old 11-18-2014 | 05:06 PM
  #430  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: AA
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Delta's retirement contribution is 15 percent. There is no match. It's simple now.
Thanks....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
hoodabundy
United
219
08-18-2013 08:52 PM
Snarge
United
57
02-12-2013 06:33 AM
Thunder1
United
17
11-29-2011 03:16 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
115
11-22-2010 03:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices