Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - APR Disputed Pairings >

FDX - APR Disputed Pairings

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - APR Disputed Pairings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2008 | 07:24 PM
  #191  
v1 uh-oh's Avatar
Ready for a nap
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: md11
Default

They threw another one in. 2303 22apr, 98 CH's and you get 75 fun-filled hours in Sh!t's End. Some dumb bastard will be all over this.

7/32
Reply
Old 04-20-2008 | 11:08 PM
  #192  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: md11 fo
Default

Look at 2305/27Apr. Another DP from ANC that was rewritten. It didn't take any time at all for it to disappear
Reply
Old 04-21-2008 | 04:06 AM
  #193  
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
Thread Starter
...Whatever It Is!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nightfreight
Looks like MD-11 trip 2302/21Apr is a MEM version of ANC trip 30/23Apr.. My guess is it won't last long.....

Split into 2304/21 and some trips (??). 2304 assigned to reserves, both seats.
Reply
Old 04-21-2008 | 04:09 AM
  #194  
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
Trust but Verify!!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CRA
Default

"Look at 2305/27Apr. Another DP from ANC that was rewritten. It didn't take any time at all for it to disappear"

I saw that but it appeared to me it had been revised to take out the disputed legs. If that is the case I don't see why it isn't OK to pick up? The other one I saw was pretty easy to figure out as they just added D/H's to ANC on either end and kept the 3 legs out of SFS the same. I agree that one should have been left alone. The whole point of disputing pairings is to get them rewritten and the disputed legs taken out. If that is done why can't we pick them up? I am sure someone will point out my misunderstanding here for which I thank you in advance...
Reply
Old 04-21-2008 | 04:16 AM
  #195  
USMCFDX's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FDXer
92 plus hours of pay. That's a lot of hours for a four week month considering it only has two days of carryover.
I forgot to write down the new pairing, but this one was rewitten and it went to a Capt and FO on reserve. DH to ANC and DH from NRT at the end, but still had the 3 leg dispute in the middle.

Found it, trip 2304 on 21 Apr. https://pilot.fedex.com/vips-bin/vip...4?MEM?11?21Apr

Poor guys got used on every R day but one.

Last edited by USMCFDX; 04-21-2008 at 04:29 AM.
Reply
Old 04-21-2008 | 04:17 AM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Default

So I guess you picked it up?
Reply
Old 04-21-2008 | 04:21 AM
  #197  
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
Trust but Verify!!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CRA
Default

"So I guess you picked it up?"

Is that your answer? No I didn't. It was picked up while I was researching to see if it was a DP from ANC. I couldn't find anything disputed about the new pairing though. I will call the union this morning and let you know what I find out..
Reply
Old 04-21-2008 | 04:48 AM
  #198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
Default

So I guess you picked it up?
If they fixed it, then I hope he did.
Reply
Old 04-21-2008 | 05:21 AM
  #199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Default

It wasn't supposed to be a negative comment... Just a question. And if the disputed portion was fixed, you should have picked it up....
Reply
Old 04-21-2008 | 11:12 AM
  #200  
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
Trust but Verify!!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CRA
Default

Originally Posted by nightfreight
It wasn't supposed to be a negative comment... Just a question. And if the disputed portion was fixed, you should have picked it up....
No problem..Talked to the SIG Chief and he said if they had fixed the issues that caused the pairing to be disputed to begin with it should be OK to pick up. In a perfect world all DP's whether reworked or not would be left alone. The bottom line is to make onerous pairings hard for the company to fill. Having to split it and change the disputed part of the trip accomplishes this to some degree. If it is as painfull for the company to fill it as it is for us to fly it then we may find a lot less DP's in our future...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2cylinderdriver
Cargo
186
04-02-2008 12:32 PM
jagplt
Cargo
12
03-15-2008 07:01 AM
FX Bone Guy
Cargo
18
01-29-2008 07:53 PM
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
54
12-30-2007 12:24 AM
FlybyKnite
Cargo
67
11-18-2007 11:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices