Search
Notices
Charter Part 121 pax charter airlines

The other Atlas thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2014, 11:27 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: What day is it?
Posts: 963
Default

Originally Posted by cargowannabe View Post
Just curious how you know about the phone calls if they in fact did take place? Whatever your position from inside OUR Union you sure do make a good case for management.

BTW, I will not copy and paste the P2P notes I received from a P2P member, but the quote was something like "we will ALWAYS be told if we negotiate." Well I have not been at Atlas long at all, but I seem to remember the AQP stuff was talked about with the company BEFORE we were told (BTW not asked what we wanted to open up 66 pages of contract) and now the gateway travel stuff, kinda makes go UHHHHHH what do I believe.

The $1000 increase in pilot pay to $1 mil rev where did you get that number, supposition, quick math or a truth, sorry fact? You know thinking that through how are we still in bid'ness from the old pay rates to the new ones with the same guarantee??????

Again not trying to divide just asking a question?

As far as where people come from and how they seem to be talked down to, I would be embarrassed to be that arrogant. Really everyone here has a story. Some better, some worse but we are all in it together. I assume we all want the same thing. The best for ourselves and our family. The question seems to be just how to achieve that common goal. I truly think this group is tired of living in a mushroom field.

cargowannabe
Quite correct. Interesting however, the volume directed at the people here who have been around and have done it being dismissed by a group of vocal new folks who feel they are in a position to teach the course in how to do things. Listening and learning goes a long way to understanding.

Like the old saying, "better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."
ATCsaidDoWhat is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 11:32 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Whaledriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 466
Default

I happen to need to speak to an ExCo member yesterday. I did not think to challenge him on if it was the truth, sorry.

No successful negotiation can take place (from our point of view) if our side is talking about what we will or will not accept in open forums, yet the other side is silent. Like playing poker with your cards showing and the other guy hidden. Kinda hard to bluff and/or win.

Every time they talk, it is negotiations of one type or another. At some point, you gotta trust your elected officials. If there is any situation where you think they have violated that trust, give one of them a call and let them defend themselves. You might be amazed, when you hear the facts, and many times, the facts simply can not be made public.

Trust me, the next group will promise the world and four years from now, the same conversions will be taking place.

1000 pilots x $1000.00 equals $1,000,000.00
Whaledriver is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 11:35 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: What day is it?
Posts: 963
Default

Originally Posted by thesandbox View Post
I think Atlas has a good business model and the leadership has been put in the positions by the system of checks and balances that goes along with a publicly traded company and I enjoy the semblance of security that brings. I can not speak for others but at Ryan we did have a decent business model that used to have us at over 800 pilots also flying for Emery and USPS that was undercut by politics at the highest level of the USPS and FedEx. The owners that purchased us in 2004 were a commercial real estate development company with greedy investors that set up so many LLC's that it has been discovered over just the last several months through further affidavits and subpoenas that the owners were actually able to steal over $100 MILLION in just the last year alone. We had revenues of $300-400 million the last few years and only around $50 million in debt.....go figure. We once thought we were the cream of the crap and well supported with a solid game plan but yes, the greedy saw $200-300K profit margins off of uncle sams teet and burned all their bridges flying those measly $30K profit margin trips. It is sad these days how a few can ruin it for several hundreds of others but it is what it is and I know there are already a few in jail for their fuel schemes with the DOD and hopefully more will come. For the pilot group it was a great place to work and we know we made money and supported all their commercial developments through the downturn. Several of us are now here and, yes, we enjoy it and have found the pilot group just as great. It is also nice to know growth and customers are not taken lightly and that hopefully we have a large enough market cap that keeps the hedge funds away as well. I am almost 43 and would like to spend my next 14 years at the same place once again, enjoying the type of flying this provides but it would be nice to know that OUR contract matches the type of product we provide and the customers that we try to attract. Some of us are just trying to help make all of our collective careers here the best it possibly can be.
I think everyone is of your mindset on this. One of the advantages of this management team over the previous one is that while they may not always say it, they understand the value of having a motivated pilot group.

That's not to say there aren't people in the middle who are intent on empire building or spending time figuring out how to work deals to their own benefit.

There are pilots who do the same. Both are wrong.

If either side begins the response with a sharp stick to the eye, the outcome is pretty well set before the conversation gets started.
ATCsaidDoWhat is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 01:45 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 282
Default

What is the point of starting this new thread other than to rehash what has been said or is being said in the "old" one? I recommend this one be locked by the moderator.
kme9418 is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 01:54 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 249
Default

So this is what Stockholm syndrome looks like...
CandlerKid is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 07:09 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Netjets had an interesting idea that might work for Atlas...

They had 3 different schedules, and it worked out perfectly, because they had 1/3 of the pilots wanted to work more, 1/3 wanted less, and 1/3 liked it the way it was. They would bid for one of the 3 schedules, and their schedule would last for a year?...or maybe six month, then the schedules were rebid.

Currently, we owe 17 days to the company. Instead, we could have 3 schedules: 19 days, 17 days and 15 days....or we could make it 18/16/14...whatever we could agree to the company with.

19/17/15 would leave the company with the same number of workdays per month from the pilot group.

You bid on if you want the Long, Med or Short schedule, by seniority in the company. You get that schedule for 6 months? 1 year?

Then you bid the lines for your assigned schedule.

If you want to make more, you can work the longer schedule...if you want to be home more, you work the shorter schedule.

At NetJets, it worked out well as (almost) no one felt screwed, and everyone got what they wanted.

What do you think about this 3-tiered schedule???
atpcliff is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 07:20 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

We currently have a "Base" AND a "Gateway".

I have been promoting a change in our next contract to Worldwide Gateway Basing (getting rid of our Bases, and making our Base, and our "Tax Home" our Gateway). If we don't get Worldwide Gateway Basing, my second choice would be Domestic Gateway Basing.

The reason I am promoting Gateway Basing as opposed to Home Basing is because it is easier and cheaper than Home Basing for the company, so it would be easier to convince them to switch to Gateway Basing, than it would be to convince them to switch to Home Basing. And, Gateway Basing would be a LOT better than what we have now...for one thing: No more imputed income!!!
atpcliff is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 07:39 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Brokenwind's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: Gear and flap operator
Posts: 93
Default

Blimey!

Just as a casual observation on this new and cool thread...

Lots of (stacks of) overtime. JC blatantly coming out and saying that we are turning down opportunities coz we don't have crews.

Read between the lines if you have to. We are understaffed to the hilt and it will not get better...

You want overtime? Right now it is the low hanging fruit and even outbases are going junior...

Lots of leverage for the pilot group. Lots of money for the hungry ones and this is finally a real time show of the impending shortage within our industry.

Take it and run right now when you can but I think the suits have a plan B ready...
Brokenwind is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 08:56 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 400
Default

Originally Posted by kme9418 View Post
What is the point of starting this new thread other than to rehash what has been said or is being said in the "old" one? I recommend this one be locked by the moderator.
It is very very very very simple. The other thread is for topics regarding HIRING.....because it is in the HIRING thread.

Any other questions?
Ludicrous Speed is offline  
Old 06-29-2014, 09:09 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Wind checker
Posts: 763
Cool

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
Netjets had an interesting idea that might work for Atlas...

They had 3 different schedules, and it worked out perfectly, because they had 1/3 of the pilots wanted to work more, 1/3 wanted less, and 1/3 liked it the way it was. They would bid for one of the 3 schedules, and their schedule would last for a year?...or maybe six month, then the schedules were rebid.

Currently, we owe 17 days to the company. Instead, we could have 3 schedules: 19 days, 17 days and 15 days....or we could make it 18/16/14...whatever we could agree to the company with.

19/17/15 would leave the company with the same number of workdays per month from the pilot group.

You bid on if you want the Long, Med or Short schedule, by seniority in the company. You get that schedule for 6 months? 1 year?

Then you bid the lines for your assigned schedule.

If you want to make more, you can work the longer schedule...if you want to be home more, you work the shorter schedule.

At NetJets, it worked out well as (almost) no one felt screwed, and everyone got what they wanted.

What do you think about this 3-tiered schedule???
What about a 12 day line as well? This whole work thing is interrupting my social life. If they can kick the rig to 7 that would be super too....
hvydvr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MaroonBaboon
Hiring News
3
01-18-2013 06:31 PM
F15andMD11
Cargo
18
03-03-2010 04:37 PM
capto
Cargo
480
01-22-2010 07:29 PM
jungle
Money Talk
48
12-28-2009 11:11 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices