Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Compass Airlines
Compass Updates - Saga Continues >

Compass Updates - Saga Continues

Search

Notices
Compass Airlines Regional Airline

Compass Updates - Saga Continues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2017 | 05:26 PM
  #8251  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fpmx772
Agree to disagree. How does FOs bypassing hurt other FOs? Not sure I follow your logic here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A bypassing FO is filling the sic column with worthless hours. A bypassing FO is typically bidding the most lucrative trips (giving other FOs less productive flying). A bypassing FO is getting a lot of days off and likely picking up a lot of flying. Having people sitting on the top of the list in either seat is a bad thing.

I don't see how you can think a right seat captain is the equivalent of a scab without understanding how a bypassing FO hurts other FOs at a greater level.

As I've said before, if you allow right seat captain's you essentially do not need reserve first officers (reserve captains can do that flying). The company can have enough captain's on reserve to cover FO and CA flying. This encourages the company to upgrade and keeps FOs off reserve. I do not see why this is a bad thing. Would you rather be on reserve looking to pick up flying or a line holder?

Maybe agreeing to disagree is appropriate.
Old 10-10-2017 | 05:32 PM
  #8252  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
A bypassing FO is filling the sic column with worthless hours. A bypassing FO is typically bidding the most lucrative trips (giving other FOs less productive flying). A bypassing FO is getting a lot of days off and likely picking up a lot of flying. Having people sitting on the top of the list in either seat is a bad thing.



I don't see how you can think a right seat captain is the equivalent of a scab without understanding how a bypassing FO hurts other FOs at a greater level.



As I've said before, if you allow right seat captain's you essentially do not need reserve first officers (reserve captains can do that flying). The company can have enough captain's on reserve to cover FO and CA flying. This encourages the company to upgrade and keeps FOs off reserve. I do not see why this is a bad thing. Would you rather be on reserve looking to pick up flying or a line holder?



Maybe agreeing to disagree is appropriate.


First off I never said anything about a scab, so let’s get that clear. But basically ur saying that filing the Column with worthless sic hrs is a bad thing, yet your a ca that wants to fill that column with more sic hrs, so that makes no sense. As someone stated 1,000hrs of pic is not the magic number anymore otherwise we wouldn’t be here having this conversation as you would be long gone and at a major already. Again, I just don’t understand your logic here. I agree with the union and every other ca I talk to about this, right seat ca flying hurts us all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Old 10-10-2017 | 05:32 PM
  #8253  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Thumbs down

Friends don't let their captain friends volunteer to fly right seat. But hey, it's all about me me me at this place no matter the damage done to your fellow pilots so have it. Your own union is asking people to not do this. But hey volunteer and get on everyone's #&=* list. Have at it.
Old 10-10-2017 | 05:36 PM
  #8254  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
A bypassing FO is filling the sic column with worthless hours. A bypassing FO is typically bidding the most lucrative trips (giving other FOs less productive flying). A bypassing FO is getting a lot of days off and likely picking up a lot of flying. Having people sitting on the top of the list in either seat is a bad thing.

I don't see how you can think a right seat captain is the equivalent of a scab without understanding how a bypassing FO hurts other FOs at a greater level.

As I've said before, if you allow right seat captain's you essentially do not need reserve first officers (reserve captains can do that flying). The company can have enough captain's on reserve to cover FO and CA flying. This encourages the company to upgrade and keeps FOs off reserve. I do not see why this is a bad thing. Would you rather be on reserve looking to pick up flying or a line holder?

Maybe agreeing to disagree is appropriate.
Are you crazy? A senior FO that bypasses upgrade is choosing QOL over a pay raise, which is well within their right. A right seat captain took the pay raise, and now is going to cherry pick the good trips out of open time from the FO's who want/need the flying.

Your logic is seriously flawed and self serving. If you said that you were volunteering to keep the company from cancelling flights and or junior manning an overworked FO group, that would be different..... Although still not your problem.
Old 10-10-2017 | 05:38 PM
  #8255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Default

On a side note, are we allowed to pick up trips which on a scheduled vacation day?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Old 10-10-2017 | 06:00 PM
  #8256  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fpmx772
Meaning that it’s ok to get right seat qualified to fly with his friend? Or was ur fo rolling his eyes at the fact that people shouldn’t fly right seat for that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He agreed with me.
Old 10-10-2017 | 06:02 PM
  #8257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fpmx772
First off I never said anything about a scab, so let’s get that clear. But basically ur saying that filing the Column with worthless sic hrs is a bad thing, yet your a ca that wants to fill that column with more sic hrs, so that makes no sense. As someone stated 1,000hrs of pic is not the magic number anymore otherwise we wouldn’t be here having this conversation as you would be long gone and at a major already. Again, I just don’t understand your logic here. I agree with the union and every other ca I talk to about this, right seat ca flying hurts us all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just saw the email that was sent out this morning. I believe that Union is incorrect about how it would affect the pilot group (they are assuming an adequately staffed first officers group with captains bidding first officer flying). If we were adequately staffed I would tend to agree with their assesment.

Implying that right seat captains prolong reserve seems incorrect. Reserve is exists because a pilot is unable to hold a line as a result of the bid process. Right seat captain flying would picked up post bid (after reserves are assigned).

With that said if the union doesn't want it I won't do it. When we start left seat qualifying first officers I expect to see the same unity.
Old 10-10-2017 | 06:12 PM
  #8258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by max gross
Are you crazy? A senior FO that bypasses upgrade is choosing QOL over a pay raise, which is well within their right. A right seat captain took the pay raise, and now is going to cherry pick the good trips out of open time from the FO's who want/need the flying.

Your logic is seriously flawed and self serving. If you said that you were volunteering to keep the company from cancelling flights and or junior manning an overworked FO group, that would be different..... Although still not your problem.
Weird that choosing quality of life over raise is ok and not self serving.

If I came over from Ameriflight with a 1000 TPIC and decided to sit on the top of the FO list until I finished my degree while also cherry picking open time to pay for school is ok with you?If I come here, upgrade, sit reserve in the left seat, then pick up FO open time while also working on my degree is a bad thing?

One takes good lines and cherry picks open time while the other just cherry picks open time.

Regardless, like I said in my last post, if the union flat out says no then it's a no.
Old 10-10-2017 | 06:13 PM
  #8259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fpmx772
On a side note, are we allowed to pick up trips which on a scheduled vacation day?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yes,you'll have to have Scheduling Trip Trades process it manually though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Old 10-10-2017 | 06:27 PM
  #8260  
Fr8Thrust's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Default

There’s nothing wrong with senior FOs not upgrading. Sometimes life happens, some people aren’t ready, and some have no businesss in the left-seat.

As far as right seat Captains, let me paint it this way: If I’m a Pilot, I don’t pick up shifts as an Aircraft Dispatcher or Flight Attendant, so the company doesn’t have to hire more ADX or FAs.

Always do what your union says, no matter the cause, solidarity is very important in this industry.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jparker371
Compass Airlines
9519
03-01-2016 08:57 AM
35RSLC
Compass Airlines
37
05-31-2015 02:58 PM
3inthegreen
Compass Airlines
140
04-14-2015 03:44 PM
drosenst
Compass Airlines
12
11-19-2008 06:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices