Notices

MD-90 going bye-bye?

Old 06-24-2017 | 12:21 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Now if we can just buy 30 used 777s and crush United's SFO hub with our LAX hub.

Will LAX-MNL be senior?
Reply
Old 06-24-2017 | 03:30 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,822
Likes: 156
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Now if we can just buy 30 used 777s and crush United's SFO hub with our LAX hub.

Will LAX-MNL be senior?
That depends on your definition of we.
Reply
Old 06-24-2017 | 03:57 PM
  #43  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Now if we can just buy 30 used 777s and crush United's SFO hub with our LAX hub.
Even if you did get 30 more used 777s tomorrow, you'd still have 54 less than United.

Plus, where would you plan on parking those 777s at LAX? That place was built for 1960s sized planes, not present day aircraft. LAX isn't built for the kind of feed you would need to do what United does in SFO.
Reply
Old 06-24-2017 | 07:57 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,822
Likes: 156
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Even if you did get 30 more used 777s tomorrow, you'd still have 54 less than United.

Plus, where would you plan on parking those 777s at LAX? That place was built for 1960s sized planes, not present day aircraft. LAX isn't built for the kind of feed you would need to do what United does in SFO.
All we'd have to is pay the bribe-uh, I mean, make the fairly priced market based infrastructure investment for the local community, and we could get the gate space we need.

The going rate for big city shakedow-uh, I mean airport improvement development commissions, is about a quarter billion per gate (because things really cost that much, yes they do) but first we have to pay 11B to have the same effect on stock price as if we didn't pay 11B, and then after that we'll have to do the same with many many more billions. But after that, perhaps there can be a proper investment in the needed JV partner facilities.
Reply
Old 06-24-2017 | 08:56 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 176
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Even if you did get 30 more used 777s tomorrow, you'd still have 54 lessthan United.
35 less...

(83-30-18=35)
Reply
Old 06-25-2017 | 04:28 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Even if you did get 30 more used 777s tomorrow, you'd still have 54 less than United.

Plus, where would you plan on parking those 777s at LAX? That place was built for 1960s sized planes, not present day aircraft. LAX isn't built for the kind of feed you would need to do what United does in SFO.
Consider all the Asian carriers that fly into LAX.

And ask yourself.

What is their feed?

I've lost count, how many domestic cities do we feed LAX from?

How many domestic cites does Singapore Airlines feed Singapore from?

Zero

In my opinion we can compete head to head from LAX with any Asian carrier.
Reply
Old 06-25-2017 | 06:55 AM
  #47  
Han Solo's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
From: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
gzsg screwed up a quote on page 2 and everyone that quoted that perpetuates the bad coding for that quote thread. Usually it's sailingfun!
Maybe gzsg and Sailingfun are the separate accounts of the ultimate Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde @ DAL????
Reply
Old 06-25-2017 | 07:53 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
In my opinion we can compete head to head from LAX with any Asian carrier.
Hmm. Isn't Delta's business model to JV out almost all of the heavy international flying? That being the case, they won't need any used 777s.
Reply
Old 06-25-2017 | 08:09 AM
  #49  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 654
From: ir.delta.com
Default

http://news.delta.com/sites/default/...ographic-1.png

Count the number of red dots vs. the number of blue dots. There's your answer.
Reply
Old 06-25-2017 | 08:46 AM
  #50  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
35 less...

(83-30-18=35)
United has 9 more 777s being delivered by the end of 2017. So it would be 92 on the property. Let's just call it 44 less. But the point is LAX doesn't support a single airline like ATL, SFO, DFW, etc to be able to have a massive WB fleet there, because those things need massive small jet feed, which nobody has enough of in LAX. Terminal 9 being built for United only adds 8 or 9 gates and it still won't be enough. And it won't be ready until 2022.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Plane Ramrod
Spirit
29
03-15-2017 03:00 PM
DALFA
Delta
5
10-11-2016 07:01 AM
MD11FLYER
FedEx
22
01-11-2016 12:53 PM
FlyHigh423
Major
5
10-24-2009 03:58 PM
PeopleMover
Major
20
05-30-2008 05:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices