![]() |
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 2960691)
There was a statement that positions were offered on the 88 because there wouldn't be enough bidders to backfill... but if they elect to backfill and there aren't bidders for those positions, can't those positions also be offered to new hires?
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2960762)
Only if they are posted on a AE first.
|
Originally Posted by Rinaldi
(Post 2960773)
are you sure? I always thought an unfilled contingency vacancy can go to a new hire.
In point of fact, when discussing what positions have been available for new hires, discussion on whether there were unfilled contingent vacancies or backfilling was not completed has been part of the discourse. |
Originally Posted by Rinaldi
(Post 2960773)
are you sure? I always thought an unfilled contingency vacancy can go to a new hire.
|
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 2960775)
Yup...he is correct. A contingency vacancy is not a category vacancy. See 22.E.10 and 22.A.9
|
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 2960776)
"category vacancy" just means that the only ones available for new hires are First Officer positions, it is not mentioned as "category vacancy" as a regular AE either.
|
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 2960778)
The question was about contingency vacancies. A new hire cannot be awarded a contingency vacancy. That vacancy would have to be posted as a category vacancy in a subsequent AE and, if unbid, then becomes eligible to be filled by a new hire. Look at 22.E.1.c. I didn't write the PWA, just telling you how it works.
|
Originally Posted by Baradium
(Post 2960780)
I'm looking at the PWA. I just don't agree that it says that as clearly as you state. That doesn't mean the company doesn't fill them like that but I recall class drops including contingent positions that were never offered in a subsequent AE.
|
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 2960783)
Are you sure they were contingent vacancies? Got an example? Not calling you out but I'd like to see where a vacancy not offered to the pilot group at large was, instead, proffered to a new hire.
|
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 2960520)
98% in the right seat? With 90 vacancies even if they fill half, it's going to go super junior. We are expecting ~20 new hires on the ER alone in March.
When I hired (early 18) there had been consistently 2 or more ER slots a class. Two years later, I have less than 10 below me. Granted, this is more vacancies than we've had, but I haven't seen them offered to new hires even though there have been unfilled slots. I do know when I went through IQ, there was a lot of grousing from the SLIs and NSLIs about it shouldn't be a new hire plane. Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:30 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands