1721
#591
Line Holder

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 42
According to the CDC website, 31.7% of all CDC deaths were age 85+, 26.5% age 75-84, and 21.1% age 65-74. That’s 79.3% of all COVID deaths in the US were age 65 or older. Protect those at risk, let the others get on with life. By the way, for all those states that have shot down their schools, looks like only 95 total deaths are age 0-17.
#592
Why do people think this is possible? How does a 65 year old go to the grocery store safely? How does a 50 year old at risk teacher go to school? How does a young low risk nurse at a senior citizens home avoid interacting with the residents? You cannot identify all vulnerable people and completely isolate them from society. The only way to slow the spread and minimize deaths is to reduce human interaction as much as possible. Allowing low risk individuals to go about their lives as if COVID isn't a thing will just make it spread faster which WILL cause the high risk people to catch it.
#593
Why do people think this is possible? How does a 65 year old go to the grocery store safely? How does a 50 year old at risk teacher go to school? How does a young low risk nurse at a senior citizens home avoid interacting with the residents? You cannot identify all vulnerable people and completely isolate them from society. The only way to slow the spread and minimize deaths is to reduce human interaction as much as possible. Allowing low risk individuals to go about their lives as if COVID isn't a thing will just make it spread faster which WILL cause the high risk people to catch it.
#594
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 34
Again, just read what I said. Of people who get the 'Vid, 2.8% (I said 2 because it's not like it's crazy high) will die as a result of Covid (through complications, 94%). Those are the numbers from John's Hopkins, it's the same data we're all using, you break it out however you want, but the % mortality for >70 get's kinda scary and I don't know how it contributes to the discussion.
Am I misunderstanding the numbers I cited or losing a decimal place? Something, anything, that explains what at first blush appears to be "as expected" mortality numbers for the 80+ demographic
.IOW 200,000 Covid deaths....of which( 60%) or 120,000 are 75 + but they were going to be statistics anyway.
#595
Is it the best course of action... no, but that's what happens when there is no top down leadership. Even an imperfect national strategy is better than nothing.
Agreed, but our political landscape makes it impossible to accurately get the data. It would be great if we had national and detailed data about our country. That way we could make more accurate data driven policy, but politics won't allow that. The parties build their platforms on ideals rather than facts, so if we decide to get the data, that might show that a party was wrong about a policy and no one wants to admit that.
So many problems in our country could be solved with data. But that would be scary because then the government could track us
. Instead, we give our data away to countless companies without thinking about it. The sad thing is, most tech and healthcare companies probably have a better picture of the pandemic than our actual government.
I’m glad we as a country can financially, psychologically, and physically handle this. This is such a shortsighted cost. Staying home has measurable results against COVID whilst the other factors aren’t being measured. I truly wonder what’s the better option. No wonder why so many feel like it’s safer at home. I think it might be way more dangerous hiding in the long run. But that’s future America’s problem.
So many problems in our country could be solved with data. But that would be scary because then the government could track us
. Instead, we give our data away to countless companies without thinking about it. The sad thing is, most tech and healthcare companies probably have a better picture of the pandemic than our actual government.
#596
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 979
Likes: 78
Is it the best course of action... no, but that's what happens when there is no top down leadership. Even an imperfect national strategy is better than nothing.
Agreed, but our political landscape makes it impossible to accurately get the data. It would be great if we had national and detailed data about our country. That way we could make more accurate data driven policy, but politics won't allow that. The parties build their platforms on ideals rather than facts, so if we decide to get the data, that might show that a party was wrong about a policy and no one wants to admit that.
So many problems in our country could be solved with data. But that would be scary because then the government could track us
. Instead, we give our data away to countless companies without thinking about it. The sad thing is, most tech and healthcare companies probably have a better picture of the pandemic than our actual government.
Agreed, but our political landscape makes it impossible to accurately get the data. It would be great if we had national and detailed data about our country. That way we could make more accurate data driven policy, but politics won't allow that. The parties build their platforms on ideals rather than facts, so if we decide to get the data, that might show that a party was wrong about a policy and no one wants to admit that.
So many problems in our country could be solved with data. But that would be scary because then the government could track us
. Instead, we give our data away to countless companies without thinking about it. The sad thing is, most tech and healthcare companies probably have a better picture of the pandemic than our actual government.A5S
#597
As a UNAcorn, coming to the 1721 thread for info, can you please, for the love of all that is holy and good, take the medical discussion somewhere else....like here:
Argue Masks / CDC / Politics Here!!!!
Thanks!
Argue Masks / CDC / Politics Here!!!!
Thanks!
#598
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 95
As a UNAcorn, coming to the 1721 thread for info, can you please, for the love of all that is holy and good, take the medical discussion somewhere else....like here:
Argue Masks / CDC / Politics Here!!!!
Thanks!
Argue Masks / CDC / Politics Here!!!!
Thanks!
#599
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
As a UNAcorn, coming to the 1721 thread for info, can you please, for the love of all that is holy and good, take the medical discussion somewhere else....like here:
Argue Masks / CDC / Politics Here!!!!
Thanks!
Argue Masks / CDC / Politics Here!!!!
Thanks!
LOA is out for a vote, won't know results until EOM.
CARES is in the politicians hands and they are, well, politicking
Nothing new from management other than same FUD.
Folks are going to drift a bit. It should pick up once we get closer to end of month.
#600
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 34
And there used to be a thread that was dedicated to masks...CDC...and politics. Until it got locked. I personally thought it corralled these types of discussions pretty well
Of course JMHO....and those topics are airline related...again JMHO
Of course JMHO....and those topics are airline related...again JMHO


