![]() |
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3151533)
they do, in fact, work for delta air lines inc. DGS is no longer a wholly owned subsidiary but endeavor is
|
GF to your contract piece:
Personally I think it IS worth the effort to secure better priority for our retirees. Its a disservice what they got with the EDV S3A piece and we need to rectify that. Not a huge cost item for us either. In fact not sure we would have to give up anything for it since EDV are not Delta employees. |
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3151553)
The problem lies in the fact that by bumping endeavor down in priority we create a tangible cost to delta because they have to spend more money buying people off oversold flights or the operation of endeavor (carrying DL pax and generating revenue for our PS check whenever they come back) suffers. This is not a 0 cost item to delta and will require negotiation capital to change. I personally would rather we focus that negotiation capital on issues that affect current DL pilots or tangible monetary benefits for retirees (like improvements to retiree medical). if this is truly a huge issue let’s address it in section 1 of our contract.
|
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 3151541)
Delta decided to buy SkyChefs tomorrow and kept them as a separate entity, would they be Delta employees?
Most major banks are set up in the same way. Retail banking Inc, institutional banking Inc, investment banking Inc. The CEO of J.P Morgan doesn’t get to say “that fraud was the losers in retail banking At Chase, We’re the REAL JPM bankers, and not liable”. Mainline pilots just believe it’s somehow different for them because surely, they must be on a higher level than everyone else. |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3151577)
This is going nowhere just as it did in the 90s when Delta bought ASA and Comair. This wouldn't be a problem nor would Delta furloughs be happening if we brought the flying in house but... Egos. :rolleyes: Keep Delta my Delta and all. With this attitude we will never fix SCOPE. Who would have guessed a stapler was such a powerful tool? :confused:
^^^^^this^^^^^ I’ll say it one more time, fix section 1 and this won’t be an issue |
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 3151581)
Commuter policy in affect. What is it, use more than a few times, you get counseled? Or words to that effect. Everything has a cost. If Endeavor pilots can't get to work without using PS, that's their problem. Delta pilots deal with this every day.
|
Originally Posted by Drum
(Post 3151569)
If you are non-reving - not for work - what diff does it make, no one is buying anyone off. Your priority should not be higher than a delta employee, present or retired.
I don't get it. If you have to commute to work, pretty sure you have a commuter clause in your contract. We do. It's simple, follow it if you are going to work. You're covered. Otherwise I don't get what you are trying to push here. EDV commuter clause is basically similar to ours. You are required to allow for 2 flights as a non rev or js. The 2nd flight must be on Delta paint to allow the company a positive space option. The main difference for the Delta commute is: EDV doesn’t have the ability to book the jumpseat even on EDV flights. At Endeavor after the 1st flight is missed, the pilot is supposed to call crew scheduling. The EDV scheduler has discretion to positive space the pilot. now some context After EDV became wholly owned, Delta shifted the flying from MSP/DTW/MEM to a very heavy NYC/ATL component without increasing total block hours. That turned a lot of people into commuters almost over night. Delta was on a mission reducing the number of contact carriers. Comair had just happened and the Mesa lawsuit over competed flights had just happened or was in court at the time. The Mesa lawsuit was a huge wake up call to the contract carriers. Prior to that most companies would give up landing slots in NY or bend over backwards in anyway possible to accommodate mainline in an IROP. After the lawsuit Endeavor was going to make sure flights were completed no matter what, and that staffing wasn’t going to be an issue specifically in NYC. To ensure departures EDV bumped a lot of paying passengers for commuting pilots. These passengers were mostly flying between hubs, and several that were connecting out of JFK. Delta management did not like that, so they choose to increase EDV boarding priority. There may have been some spite towards the Delta pilots factored into the equation, but I don’t think that was the main driver for DL management. now that the change has occurred and Delta achieved less passengers being bumped for commuters, retiree priority will be hard to get back. Like everything it is probably negotiable, but I for one have that waaaaaaay down my list of things to negotiate for. |
I'm pretty much king of the S3b's, if I get on, just about every one behind me does too. That is just the way it works with loads.
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 3151582)
As far as the security and exchange commission is concerned, yes. In your scenario if sky chefs committed fraud Ed Bastian would go to jail.
Most major banks are set up in the same way. Retail banking Inc, institutional banking Inc, investment banking Inc. The CEO of J.P Morgan doesn’t get to say “that fraud was the losers in retail banking At Chase, We’re the REAL JPM bankers, and not liable”. Mainline pilots just believe it’s somehow different for them because surely, they must be on a higher level than everyone else. Here's the list of subsidiaries of DELTA AIR LINES, INC. as of December 31, 2019. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...12019ex211.htm |
Seems to me that pressure should be applied in whatever way possible to get s3a limited to active EDV employees going to or from work. An option on travelnet with audits to insure proper use could be an option until IT can accomplish the task. If we can get 1972 iCrew to limit Jumpseat booking to proper days I have to imagine they can manage the same for s3a.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands