35 Large RJs coming back?
#1433
Yeah it is. Everything is for sale. The fact that you don't acknowledge that means you know nothing of negotiations. If they offered a $500,000 bonus for those 35 RJs you gonna tell me you wouldn't take it?
#1434
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 168
From: window seat
Half the ASK's and half the BH's. And half is half. Any dip below must be made up in the next period by a rise above. Can't blame on compliance on the other airlines either; if they're not in compliance, pull the code until they are.
#1435
Can’t find crew pickup
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 189
Except the fact that would cost the company $6 billion + by napkin math for everyone on the SL. I would assume that most people say scope isn’t for sale because the company isn’t willing to pay the price it would cost for most. But you are correct, everything is on the table in negotiations, but I would again submit it would have to be a huge deal for most to even consider it.
#1436
Except the fact that would cost the company $6 billion + by napkin math for everyone on the SL. I would assume that most people say scope isn’t for sale because the company isn’t willing to pay the price it would cost for most. But you are correct, everything is on the table in negotiations, but I would again submit it would have to be a huge deal for most to even consider it.
Negotiations involve two parties willing to work together towards an agreement in good faith. Very clear based on how Section 6 negotiations went and how they are trying to back door these 35 RJs that the company isn’t willing to negotiate in good faith, and doesn’t value our asset (scope) the same way we do.
Therefore our asset is not for sale.
#1437
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 168
From: window seat
Everything is not for sale. The high theory of "well if they gave us a billion dollars for more RJ's..." [actually your example is about 6.5B] yadda yadda is just silly. They can't and they won't, and if they offered something eye watering in exchange for a core tenant of our contract then I would suspect a trap long before I ever mentally pre-spent the money.
How about the top 49% of the list gets stapled to the bottom in inverse seniority order in exchange for positive space commuting, guaranteed 4-5 star hotels (with points!), an 8/3/3 with a targeted $200K signing bonus only for the 51% and an extra week of vacation only for the 51%? Everything is for sale, right?
While I get the gist of your argument over all, its that prevailing philosophy that I take issue with; especially the hyperbolic theoreticals that philosophy is often rife with. They will never make us filthy rich in exchange for a small concession. Ever. We will never even get all the value of an apparently small concession.
Are more large RJ's "for sale"?
No.
Oh come on, theoretically, right? Like Indecent Proposal, right?
OK we'll play along. Sure LOL.
Great how much?
You can't afford it.
Roll credits.
#1438
Scope Choke... Instead of swinging for the moon and proposing full sweep, economically unviable measures like bring Endeavor pilots into mainline or have Delta fly the 35 RJs, we should propose a plan that gradually reduces the overall footprint of DCI while growing SNB mainline jets.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
#1439
The economics of 50seat jets is a thing of the past. The only thing that is keeping them around at the moment is that they can't have more larger RJ's and that they are inexpensive to buy/lease. I have no doubt the market will remove them from the property with out our help or anything we "sell".
#1440
Exactly this. Bond would love us to roll over and hand the company a win.
Negotiations involve two parties willing to work together towards an agreement in good faith. Very clear based on how Section 6 negotiations went and how they are trying to back door these 35 RJs that the company isn’t willing to negotiate in good faith, and doesn’t value our asset (scope) the same way we do.
Therefore our asset is not for sale.
Negotiations involve two parties willing to work together towards an agreement in good faith. Very clear based on how Section 6 negotiations went and how they are trying to back door these 35 RJs that the company isn’t willing to negotiate in good faith, and doesn’t value our asset (scope) the same way we do.
Therefore our asset is not for sale.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



