CA vacancy?
#111
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 292
Likes: 46
What about lazy pilots that don’t feel like having to iron a shirt and/or pants when they get to the hotel/crash pad? That’s my reason for commuting in uniform. That and KCM. I have a jumbo tube of toothpaste I’d like to keep during a random select.
#112
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk
#113
Crest and Colegate comes in 2.4 oz tubes for .99 at Target. You don't have to drag your Costco sized tube to save .69 per decade on bulk toothpaste.
#114
How does wearing your uniform to the crashpad save on ironing? It seems like you are getting dressed for the commute to the crashpad, then again the next morning when you go to work.
Crest and Colegate comes in 2.4 oz tubes for .99 at Target. You don't have to drag your Costco sized tube to save .69 per decade on bulk toothpaste.
Crest and Colegate comes in 2.4 oz tubes for .99 at Target. You don't have to drag your Costco sized tube to save .69 per decade on bulk toothpaste.
Sent from my broke ass SM-S908U using Tapatalk
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 60
Doesn't Delta teach whatabout-ism every QC training? They couch it in different terms though. They say "If but for" . Same thing. Delta seems to think it's relevant.
Most male FA/pilots would consider it a compliment for a female pilot/FA to take their picture. So, 'but for' the reversal of sexes, you determine it's sexism or not?
So, for folks to call for his dismissal seems a bridge to far, especially since he hasn't had his 'day in court"...unless you consider the kangaroo court of this forum valid.
The "scary-ness" of his thought process is matched by the "scary-ness" of those who jump to judgment based on one side of the story. I don't know if taking pictures of people in public is a firing offense. Maybe a HR course but loss of livlihood? Doesn't sound logical to me
Most male FA/pilots would consider it a compliment for a female pilot/FA to take their picture. So, 'but for' the reversal of sexes, you determine it's sexism or not?
So, for folks to call for his dismissal seems a bridge to far, especially since he hasn't had his 'day in court"...unless you consider the kangaroo court of this forum valid.
The "scary-ness" of his thought process is matched by the "scary-ness" of those who jump to judgment based on one side of the story. I don't know if taking pictures of people in public is a firing offense. Maybe a HR course but loss of livlihood? Doesn't sound logical to me
#116
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
but thank you for saying the person *being called an alcoholic because finessed disagrees with me* is the petty one 👀
#120
On Reserve

Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
It’s not a simple issue of being able to take photos/videos in public places, so trivializing it as such seems disingenuous.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



