Prepare Yourselves… 2025 AEs
#2271
I agree. However for some strange reason people will defend SSN seniority to the bitter end and you’ll inevitably hear some nonsense that airlines would face crushing lawsuits if they even attempted it despite many airlines successfully doing it for generations without them.
Its the same mentality that we should have 5 hour “I’m a little drop of fuel” oral exams because “that’s how we did it back in my day”.
NH seniority should be DOB with oldest first. It never will be because this, for some inexplicable reason, is more of an emotional “hill to die on” than even the most niche triple dip scams ever invented.
I agree with you, but this is a #lostcause.
Its the same mentality that we should have 5 hour “I’m a little drop of fuel” oral exams because “that’s how we did it back in my day”.
NH seniority should be DOB with oldest first. It never will be because this, for some inexplicable reason, is more of an emotional “hill to die on” than even the most niche triple dip scams ever invented.
I agree with you, but this is a #lostcause.
#2272
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
#2273
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
That’s about as far as I philosophically take it. And unlike so many in the SSN/random crowd for some reason, it’s not a hill to die on for me. FWIW, had this been the case in my class, it wouldn’t have made a difference as I ended up with almost exactly the same class seniority. While there were younger pilots senior to me there were older ones junior to me so by total coincidence my age/SSN either way would have been pretty much identical.
I just think it’s the better way to do it. The next best way would be date of interview. The next would be a truly random on the spot number generator (or even picking out of a hat) as SSN is set at birth (practically speaking for most) just like age is, so where is the cosmic justice in that if we’re trying to plead to our parents that our sibling got more cookies than we did or whatever the argument is.
I wouldn’t support any retroactive change, I just think age is a better way to do in class seniority because the older pilots will retire first so they have less time here and the younger pilots will all still be there after they are gone. (Medical retirements notwithstanding).
#2274
Like, do you really expect pilots on other fleets to AE into DTW717B? There were no backfills because no one wants that seat.
There will be 20+ DTW717B on future AEs when the new hires start showing up on Virginia Ave. God bless them for getting stuck on the 717 in DTW, especially those who will be commuting from the west coast.
There will be 20+ DTW717B on future AEs when the new hires start showing up on Virginia Ave. God bless them for getting stuck on the 717 in DTW, especially those who will be commuting from the west coast.
Not at all but I sometimes you see some move from ATL. I do expect to see the A side backfilled though.
Standard schoolhouse rumor I heard was there was a an age discrimination lawsuit or they wanted to avoid the threat of one. Probably BS, but its logical in our litigious society. I know AAL did it by age with no issues. As one of the youngest in my class, I agree that it should be age.
#2275
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
No one is advocating for a list wide retroactive application of this. Just within a NH class. Older pilots have less time at the company so a small advantage isolated to within one class is something I feel is fair and support and would vote for.
That’s about as far as I philosophically take it. And unlike so many in the SSN/random crowd for some reason, it’s not a hill to die on for me. FWIW, had this been the case in my class, it wouldn’t have made a difference as I ended up with almost exactly the same class seniority. While there were younger pilots senior to me there were older ones junior to me so by total coincidence my age/SSN either way would have been pretty much identical.
I just think it’s the better way to do it. The next best way would be date of interview. The next would be a truly random on the spot number generator (or even picking out of a hat) as SSN is set at birth (practically speaking for most) just like age is, so where is the cosmic justice in that if we’re trying to plead to our parents that our sibling got more cookies than we did or whatever the argument is.
I wouldn’t support any retroactive change, I just think age is a better way to do in class seniority because the older pilots will retire first so they have less time here and the younger pilots will all still be there after they are gone. (Medical retirements notwithstanding).
That’s about as far as I philosophically take it. And unlike so many in the SSN/random crowd for some reason, it’s not a hill to die on for me. FWIW, had this been the case in my class, it wouldn’t have made a difference as I ended up with almost exactly the same class seniority. While there were younger pilots senior to me there were older ones junior to me so by total coincidence my age/SSN either way would have been pretty much identical.
I just think it’s the better way to do it. The next best way would be date of interview. The next would be a truly random on the spot number generator (or even picking out of a hat) as SSN is set at birth (practically speaking for most) just like age is, so where is the cosmic justice in that if we’re trying to plead to our parents that our sibling got more cookies than we did or whatever the argument is.
I wouldn’t support any retroactive change, I just think age is a better way to do in class seniority because the older pilots will retire first so they have less time here and the younger pilots will all still be there after they are gone. (Medical retirements notwithstanding).
#2276
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 625
Likes: 154
#2279
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 157
Likes: 7
#2280
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 56
Likes: 7
From: New Hire DL
Flt Ops podcast on fleet planning last month(?) said retired by 2030 with drawdown as early as 2028. No direct replacement, rather they’ll be replaced by other NB deliveries.
Its all relative, one man’s trash is another’s treasure.. Pretty commutable trips even on the junior end. Fairly consistent movement as well due to people breaking the seat lock after one year, as shown on this AE.
Its all relative, one man’s trash is another’s treasure.. Pretty commutable trips even on the junior end. Fairly consistent movement as well due to people breaking the seat lock after one year, as shown on this AE.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



