Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2025 | 11:08 AM
  #1681  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 281
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
There’s been many times where I get one that starts with a DH. You can DDH and make it just fine.
Plus OOBWS goes before SC in 23.O.

So I would not be in favor of your suggestion.
We both get one vote
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 11:22 AM
  #1682  
GutterGuard's Avatar
Line Holder
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 962
Likes: 745
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
I made the suggestion earlier that OOBWS should be removed from the 23.O ladder completely
No.

10Char
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 11:29 AM
  #1683  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 317
Default

Originally Posted by GutterGuard
The real question is why so many pilots are so adamantly willing to give away their leverage.

This is exactly what benefits the company. Sow discord amongst the pilot group to surreptitiously reduce our leverage as we approach section 6.
Maybe because we are getting nothing. We used to get premium flying. Now we aren’t getting anything. I don’t blame our pilots one bit. The company never should have let the scheduling department collapse. It’s great that pilots are getting paid to do nothing. Good for them. Meanwhile pilots like myself are getting hosed. I tried to pick up IA’s today that should have gone to me via GS. Watched them both go to pilots thousands of numbers junior while sitting on hold for 30 plus minutes. I never did get through to scheduling. Just gave up after trips were covered.


THIS IS A REAL PROBLEM FOR MAJORITY OF OUR PILOTS. I am ready to cash in our leverage to fix it ASAP.
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 11:35 AM
  #1684  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 548
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Maybe because we are getting nothing. We used to get premium flying. Now we aren’t getting anything. I don’t blame our pilots one bit. The company never should have let the scheduling department collapse. It’s great that pilots are getting paid to do nothing. Good for them. Meanwhile pilots like myself are getting hosed. I tried to pick up IA’s today that should have gone to me via GS. Watched them both go to pilots thousands of numbers junior while sitting on hold for 30 plus minutes. I never did get through to scheduling. Just gave up after trips were covered.


THIS IS A REAL PROBLEM FOR MAJORITY OF OUR PILOTS. I am ready to cash in our leverage to fix it ASAP.
QS will fix this problem. I'm in the same boat. I can always get a good G#1 as a 3-5 day trip. Still can, but I also used to be able to get G#2 or even 3 as some crappy turns or day trips that no one else wanted. Now those types of trips are almost exclusively covered via IA, which I generally miss out on, plus I'm not senior enough to ever get 23m7. I will be much happier when QS are implemented and I can get back to holding premium trips that my seniority affords. Between the pay + banked PB days I'm missing out on every month I can't win the IA roulette wheel I miss out on 4-5k in earnings.
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 11:35 AM
  #1685  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 233
Likes: 115
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Maybe because we are getting nothing. We used to get premium flying. Now we aren’t getting anything. I don’t blame our pilots one bit. The company never should have let the scheduling department collapse. It’s great that pilots are getting paid to do nothing. Good for them. Meanwhile pilots like myself are getting hosed. I tried to pick up IA’s today that should have gone to me via GS. Watched them both go to pilots thousands of numbers junior while sitting on hold for 30 plus minutes. I never did get through to scheduling. Just gave up after trips were covered.


THIS IS A REAL PROBLEM FOR MAJORITY OF OUR PILOTS. I am ready to cash in our leverage to fix it ASAP.
I say ALPA post the deal maker names publicly, it will be the IA Scrape list, cause it’s not to the serious level of a Scab
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 11:44 AM
  #1686  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
I say ALPA post the deal maker names publicly, it will be the IA Scrape list, cause it’s not to the serious level of a Scab
A better solution would be to slowly audit the tapes and pay every “deal maker” pilot minimum wage with no rigs for their poached flying and put the rest of the original pay into a pot to divide among us all at the end of the year. Enjoy that $150 Four day trip you just flew while we look forward to a bonus at the end of the year.
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 12:18 PM
  #1687  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
That part I understand, but 25-05 solves many of the issues causing division once implemented.
No it won't. Sure, QS will go out on seniority order, but they don't disincentivizes 23M7 farming. So then everyone will be angry that there's no GS, and everyone with a QS submitted is essentially going to be getting a category wide no batch size phone call for a slip that has no auto acknowledge.
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 12:24 PM
  #1688  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 1,103
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
No it won't. Sure, QS will go out on seniority order, but they don't disincentivizes 23M7 farming. So then everyone will be angry that there's no GS, and everyone with a QS submitted is essentially going to be getting a category wide no batch size phone call for a slip that has no auto acknowledge.
That’s as good as it’s going to get without giving away concessions, and without negotiating a more balanced solution in section 6 that takes into account the sheer value of 23M7 / auto-accept.

Those are problems the MEC should have considered before giving away batch sizes. In the meantime, manage your phone’s DND settings. QS will have a leveling mechanism, which will offer some degree of predictability as to when it will be “your turn”.
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 12:48 PM
  #1689  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 198
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
because the twelve minute timer means that 40 auto accepts delays trip coverage by 8 hours minimum.


you could staff ten schedulers per pilot and that would still be true. you could make batch sizes of one and it would still be true.

now, it is a chicken-or-the-egg situation where large batch sizes caused pilots to start auto-accepting, but if the company quit doing large batches, you wouldn’t pull your auto accept, so we’re stuck with that delay, irrespective of “crew scheduling training and staffing” and batch sizes.
100% This!!
Reply
Old 12-15-2025 | 12:49 PM
  #1690  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,481
Likes: 1,055
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
That’s as good as it’s going to get without giving away concessions, and without negotiating a more balanced solution in section 6 that takes into account the sheer value of 23M7 / auto-accept.

Those are problems the MEC should have considered before giving away batch sizes. In the meantime, manage your phone’s DND settings. QS will have a leveling mechanism, which will offer some degree of predictability as to when it will be “your turn”.
What I find just ironic about this argument is if you wait until Section 6, you'll never know exactly what we got got for it. Doing it outside section 6 is quite literally the only way you'll see the true value of the trade
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices