Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2025 | 10:31 AM
  #1711  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 1,106
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
It has nothing to do with X base getting X layovers. OOB flying doesn't help the staffing formula, but reserves and premium flying does, not to mention more premium puts more money into pilot pockets. So the pilot flying OOB trips while trying to get to a base, are working against themselves. Most pilots came from the regionals who allowed so much OOB flying because it was probably a great way to keep the pilot count down.
What drives pilot payroll even higher are OOBWS auto-accepts that force the company to pay M7 to access a SC RES, or M7 + GS/IA/QS (for 300% pay).

At this point, OOBWS is costing the company much more than it’s saving them. The number of pilots who acknowledge OOBWS rotations is incredibly low compared to the number of pilots who auto-accept them. Management wants OOBWS gone more than pilots do, and they would love nothing more than to get away with getting rid of it for free.

(Not saying that you personally are advocating to get rid of OOBWS for free. But others are.)
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 11:27 AM
  #1712  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,436
Likes: 438
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
What drives pilot payroll even higher are OOBWS auto-accepts that force the company to pay M7 to access a SC RES, or M7 + GS/IA/QS (for 300% pay).

At this point, OOBWS is costing the company much more than it’s saving them. The number of pilots who acknowledge OOBWS rotations is incredibly low compared to the number of pilots who auto-accept them. Management wants OOBWS gone more than pilots do, and they would love nothing more than to get away with getting rid of it for free.

(Not saying that you personally are advocating to get rid of OOBWS for free. But others are.)

Ya man, 100% with you on not giving it away for free. But leverage is only good if you actually use it and there are plenty of things to address in our contract. Who knows maybe this will help early negotiations and/or an timely contract. But ya, it would need to be a pretty big quid for that exchange. There are plenty of things that would be much more beneficial to the group over keeping OOBWS where it is now.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 12:38 PM
  #1713  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 282
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
Ya man, 100% with you on not giving it away for free. But leverage is only good if you actually use it and there are plenty of things to address in our contract. Who knows maybe this will help early negotiations and/or an timely contract. But ya, it would need to be a pretty big quid for that exchange. There are plenty of things that would be much more beneficial to the group over keeping OOBWS where it is now.
Let's get rid of OOBWS for lowering the GS trigger to 50% of ALV
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 01:03 PM
  #1714  
GutterGuard's Avatar
Line Holder
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 962
Likes: 746
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
Let's get rid of OOBWS for lowering the GS trigger to 50% of ALV
What's cheaper? No OOBWS, or no GS trigger?
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 01:04 PM
  #1715  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
Let's get rid of OOBWS for lowering the GS trigger to 50% of ALV
Quick Slips won't have a trigger, so we can get more than that. This, plus dramatic commuting improvements.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 01:37 PM
  #1716  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 282
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
Quick Slips won't have a trigger, so we can get more than that. This, plus dramatic commuting improvements.
QS fix the IA problem, not the slow coverage ladder problem. I’d rather not even see QS used and just get back to a system that works.

As for commuting improvements, sure. And here come the noncons
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 02:19 PM
  #1717  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
QS fix the IA problem, not the slow coverage ladder problem. I’d rather not even see QS used and just get back to a system that works.

As for commuting improvements, sure. And here come the noncons
They have better commuting policies than us already anyway don’t they?
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 02:34 PM
  #1718  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 282
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku
They have better commuting policies than us already anyway don’t they?
I honestly have no idea the details of the FA commute policy

I agree our policy sucks. The 2 hr break is ridiculous and needs to go away, a JS res shouldn’t require a backup. Quick easy two off the top of my head that I would like to see.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 03:44 PM
  #1719  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by SideStickMonkey
QS fix the IA problem, not the slow coverage ladder problem. I’d rather not even see QS used and just get back to a system that works.
Yes, that's why we should get more than just dropping the GS trigger.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 04:07 PM
  #1720  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 282
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
Yes, that's why we should get more than just dropping the GS trigger.
Like I said, we need commuting fixes but that feels like a Section 6 issue.

We gotta cover open time. Outside of reserves let’s make it as easy as possible to get those trips covered as premium pay. I’m sure there’s a couple ways to skin this problem.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices