MOU 25-05
#1181
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
question about it all close-in, though: would you have to be rested prior to a vas period,
in which case much of the good weather day coverage would still be unable to be vas’d without more waste than 23m7?
#1182
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
#1183
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 257
#1184
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,414
Likes: 850
Cool, but that's no longer reality. Auto Accept also wasn't meant to be used in the manner pilots are using it now.
The pilot group AND CS have crossed a Rubicon. IA's are not going back to the old days of hunting the plug down at the jet bridge. And even if scheduling walked back the batch size deal it's not going to stop pilots from submitting slips on an attempt to farm 23M7. The effort to reward ratio is too good.
This is going to lead to a reworking of the coverage ladder, and we handed them auto accept when we took the QS. The other 16,000 pilots not in this forum are happy to stop paying a few dozen 23M7 farmers to go back to the old status quo of Arcos calling every now and then with a GS.
A lot of people here may disagree, but the average joe flying the line thinks the farmers sitting at home with no intent to fly are part of the problem.
The pilot group AND CS have crossed a Rubicon. IA's are not going back to the old days of hunting the plug down at the jet bridge. And even if scheduling walked back the batch size deal it's not going to stop pilots from submitting slips on an attempt to farm 23M7. The effort to reward ratio is too good.
This is going to lead to a reworking of the coverage ladder, and we handed them auto accept when we took the QS. The other 16,000 pilots not in this forum are happy to stop paying a few dozen 23M7 farmers to go back to the old status quo of Arcos calling every now and then with a GS.
A lot of people here may disagree, but the average joe flying the line thinks the farmers sitting at home with no intent to fly are part of the problem.
It's apparent here many don't understand VAS. Puddytatt has explained it to you I would as well, but he's already mentioned it now twice in what is written in 23. EE
The company has made the conscious decision to soak trips until close in then hit the IA panic button. "We" (as a collective group) happily gobble them up. So wash-rinse-repeat. Someone has to break the death spiral here, it sure won't be the company. They are under staffed on both pilots and CS folks so they found a workable short cut rather than doing the right thing and hire more people. Myself and others have pointed that out as root cause many times already. The farmers are going to farm, it's really nothing new. Just happens more frequently now due to the actions of CS hitting the IA button. How do you change behavior? There's a simple answer to that. DALPA is trying to make it more costly using the IA panic button via 25-05 as well as trying to get some semblance of seniority respected in the process. How it plays out remains to be seen. Re-working the coverage ladder in my opinion is a not so good idea.
#1185
Cool, but that's no longer reality. Auto Accept also wasn't meant to be used in the manner pilots are using it now.
The pilot group AND CS have crossed a Rubicon. IA's are not going back to the old days of hunting the plug down at the jet bridge. And even if scheduling walked back the batch size deal it's not going to stop pilots from submitting slips on an attempt to farm 23M7. The effort to reward ratio is too good.
This is going to lead to a reworking of the coverage ladder, and we handed them auto accept when we took the QS. The other 16,000 pilots not in this forum are happy to stop paying a few dozen 23M7 farmers to go back to the old status quo of Arcos calling every now and then with a GS.
A lot of people here may disagree, but the average joe flying the line thinks the farmers sitting at home with no intent to fly are part of the problem.
The pilot group AND CS have crossed a Rubicon. IA's are not going back to the old days of hunting the plug down at the jet bridge. And even if scheduling walked back the batch size deal it's not going to stop pilots from submitting slips on an attempt to farm 23M7. The effort to reward ratio is too good.
This is going to lead to a reworking of the coverage ladder, and we handed them auto accept when we took the QS. The other 16,000 pilots not in this forum are happy to stop paying a few dozen 23M7 farmers to go back to the old status quo of Arcos calling every now and then with a GS.
A lot of people here may disagree, but the average joe flying the line thinks the farmers sitting at home with no intent to fly are part of the problem.
#1187
You're all over the map with what you think are rebuttals. All because you are operating from the perspective that this was done well. Just ask yourself if it really needed doing?
Last edited by notEnuf; 12-02-2025 at 11:44 AM.
#1188
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
i’m asking you to explain what was written into compliance. what, specifically, is compliant now that wasn’t compliant prior to the signing of this mou?
#1189
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 257
The last guy I flew with didn't even know that 23M7 exists, let alone that people farm it. Many, many people just fly their schedule and go home, never to think about work again until their next scheduled trip.
#1190
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




