Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:10 AM
  #1181  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Puddytatt
Why do people keep saying this? Go read the VAS section. They can cover any IROP flying before it goes to open time with it going directly to VAS.
23 EE 6 a.
thanks for the correction.

question about it all close-in, though: would you have to be rested prior to a vas period,

in which case much of the good weather day coverage would still be unable to be vas’d without more waste than 23m7?
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:11 AM
  #1182  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
What part of they agreed to allow the current policy to stand don't you understand? I'm not the one who said we re-affirmed previous agreements but it's either true or not. If true then it's writing into compliance, and if not then this MOU was for nothing.
there’s nothing that has been “written into compliance” that you can name. what is legal now that previously was not?
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:11 AM
  #1183  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
A lot of people here may disagree, but the average joe flying the line thinks the farmers sitting at home with no intent to fly are part of the problem.
The average Joe flying the line doesn't even know that there are farmers at all.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:12 AM
  #1184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,414
Likes: 850
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Cool, but that's no longer reality. Auto Accept also wasn't meant to be used in the manner pilots are using it now.

The pilot group AND CS have crossed a Rubicon. IA's are not going back to the old days of hunting the plug down at the jet bridge. And even if scheduling walked back the batch size deal it's not going to stop pilots from submitting slips on an attempt to farm 23M7. The effort to reward ratio is too good.

This is going to lead to a reworking of the coverage ladder, and we handed them auto accept when we took the QS. The other 16,000 pilots not in this forum are happy to stop paying a few dozen 23M7 farmers to go back to the old status quo of Arcos calling every now and then with a GS.

A lot of people here may disagree, but the average joe flying the line thinks the farmers sitting at home with no intent to fly are part of the problem.
The coverage ladder is just fine, it doesn't need to be "re-worked" and if you think so I don't think you'll like the outcome of that ("we never thought they would do that to us" comes to mind years down the road).

It's apparent here many don't understand VAS. Puddytatt has explained it to you I would as well, but he's already mentioned it now twice in what is written in 23. EE

The company has made the conscious decision to soak trips until close in then hit the IA panic button. "We" (as a collective group) happily gobble them up. So wash-rinse-repeat. Someone has to break the death spiral here, it sure won't be the company. They are under staffed on both pilots and CS folks so they found a workable short cut rather than doing the right thing and hire more people. Myself and others have pointed that out as root cause many times already. The farmers are going to farm, it's really nothing new. Just happens more frequently now due to the actions of CS hitting the IA button. How do you change behavior? There's a simple answer to that. DALPA is trying to make it more costly using the IA panic button via 25-05 as well as trying to get some semblance of seniority respected in the process. How it plays out remains to be seen. Re-working the coverage ladder in my opinion is a not so good idea.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:15 AM
  #1185  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 696
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Cool, but that's no longer reality. Auto Accept also wasn't meant to be used in the manner pilots are using it now.

The pilot group AND CS have crossed a Rubicon. IA's are not going back to the old days of hunting the plug down at the jet bridge. And even if scheduling walked back the batch size deal it's not going to stop pilots from submitting slips on an attempt to farm 23M7. The effort to reward ratio is too good.

This is going to lead to a reworking of the coverage ladder, and we handed them auto accept when we took the QS. The other 16,000 pilots not in this forum are happy to stop paying a few dozen 23M7 farmers to go back to the old status quo of Arcos calling every now and then with a GS.

A lot of people here may disagree, but the average joe flying the line thinks the farmers sitting at home with no intent to fly are part of the problem.
I think they are a symptom of the problem and I would be doing the same if able. The problem is the company's refusal to use the tools available in a timely manner. Why, I have no idea. My guess is to create the environment they would like to draw out section 6 and gain a few years on the PWA. Somehow we have crisis after crisis just as we are preparing for section 6. It's quite the coincidence, really.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:28 AM
  #1186  
GutterGuard's Avatar
Line Holder
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 962
Likes: 745
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
The average Joe flying the line doesn't even know that there are farmers at all.
I have yet to meet a single pilot, most of whom are "average Joes," who is not aware of 23m7 farming.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:28 AM
  #1187  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 696
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
there’s nothing that has been “written into compliance” that you can name. what is legal now that previously was not?
You're all over the map with what you think are rebuttals. All because you are operating from the perspective that this was done well. Just ask yourself if it really needed doing?

Last edited by notEnuf; 12-02-2025 at 11:44 AM.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:33 AM
  #1188  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
You're all over the map with what you think are rebuttals. All because you are operating from the perspective that this was done well. Just ask yourself if it really needed doing?
as i’ve said, i’m not arguing it was or was not.

i’m asking you to explain what was written into compliance. what, specifically, is compliant now that wasn’t compliant prior to the signing of this mou?
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:40 AM
  #1189  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 901
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by GutterGuard
I have yet to meet a single pilot, most of whom are "average Joes," who is not aware of 23m7 farming.
The last guy I flew with didn't even know that 23M7 exists, let alone that people farm it. Many, many people just fly their schedule and go home, never to think about work again until their next scheduled trip.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 11:41 AM
  #1190  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
The average Joe flying the line doesn't even know that there are farmers at all.
No, people see there's plenty of open time and yet they're not getting called for greenslips.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices