MOU 25-05
#1141
#1142
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
so knowing that, if we have no leverage, what would you expect instead of a “pinky swear,” as you put it?
#1143
im not opposed to a vote but there was absolutely no need for one. If you disagree, tell your reps. If enough people disagree, they’ll start holding (meaningless) votes. They are elected and will ultimately do what a majority of their constituents want. I strongly suspect most people don’t feel as you do, or at least not strongly enough to care, and that’s why votes don’t happen.
The MOU further codified previous settlement agreements that the company had been violating, changed the 23M7/IA process from a chaotic, seniority-abrogating mess into an orderly and efficient process, and did so without a single concession, all while also maintaining the same level 23M7 pay (which a lot of suggestions on here would’ve reduced).
The MOU further codified previous settlement agreements that the company had been violating, changed the 23M7/IA process from a chaotic, seniority-abrogating mess into an orderly and efficient process, and did so without a single concession, all while also maintaining the same level 23M7 pay (which a lot of suggestions on here would’ve reduced).
#1144
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
#1145
My part of "we" is still considering options until we have an understanding of how much payroll we are discussing. We have a problem with seniority assignments, still.
#1146
As much as DL likes to throttle sick usage, this pretty much means any sick call doesn't count, even if you get GFBd.
I was going to be on the 120+ lookback until at least next November. Now? I don't need a QHCP to sign off, unless they GFB me, in which case, it gets very spendy very quick.
Also, WHO can sign a QHCP form is forever changed to be more flexible. No longer has to be MD or DO. Can be DC, NP, PA and probably some others I'm forgetting.
#1148
Auto accept is not the problem, it’s just what the company wants you to think the problem is. The problem is 100% crew schedules and their inability to cover trips in a timely manner. Was not a problem pre-Covid. Kind of like my weak ass FAs that just refused to do service while I had seat belt sign off.
#1149
Y'all keep forgetting the sick lookback gone UFN.
As much as DL likes to throttle sick usage, this pretty much means any sick call doesn't count, even if you get GFBd.
I was going to be on the 120+ lookback until at least next November. Now? I don't need a QHCP to sign off, unless they GFB me, in which case, it gets very spendy very quick.
Also, WHO can sign a QHCP form is forever changed to be more flexible. No longer has to be MD or DO. Can be DC, NP, PA and probably some others I'm forgetting.
As much as DL likes to throttle sick usage, this pretty much means any sick call doesn't count, even if you get GFBd.
I was going to be on the 120+ lookback until at least next November. Now? I don't need a QHCP to sign off, unless they GFB me, in which case, it gets very spendy very quick.
Also, WHO can sign a QHCP form is forever changed to be more flexible. No longer has to be MD or DO. Can be DC, NP, PA and probably some others I'm forgetting.
#1150
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





