Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:20 AM
  #1141  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by tripled
agree with ooff. A vote just means we talk more. What is the purpose of that?
What is the purpose of not talking? What is the purpose of kicking the can with ALPA sanctioning that?
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:23 AM
  #1142  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
That's the question, I think it was defined as timely coverage being the issue. That's top secret now. Our "problem" was IAs and no seniority assignments. The leverage if we had/have it is the cost which I don't think is as much of a motivator as some people think.
it’s not a motivator at all unless you’re willing to reduce payroll by the amount the company is now spending. are we?

so knowing that, if we have no leverage, what would you expect instead of a “pinky swear,” as you put it?
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:24 AM
  #1143  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by texas1970
im not opposed to a vote but there was absolutely no need for one. If you disagree, tell your reps. If enough people disagree, they’ll start holding (meaningless) votes. They are elected and will ultimately do what a majority of their constituents want. I strongly suspect most people don’t feel as you do, or at least not strongly enough to care, and that’s why votes don’t happen.

The MOU further codified previous settlement agreements that the company had been violating, changed the 23M7/IA process from a chaotic, seniority-abrogating mess into an orderly and efficient process, and did so without a single concession, all while also maintaining the same level 23M7 pay (which a lot of suggestions on here would’ve reduced).
Are you reading your own words? What does this mean? We wrote them into compliance, again. Nothing has changed. We got a pinky swear to change for the concession.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:25 AM
  #1144  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Are you reading your own words? What does this mean? We wrote them into compliance, again. Nothing has changed. We got a pinky swear to change for the concession.
we didn’t write anything into compliance
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:26 AM
  #1145  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
it’s not a motivator at all unless you’re willing to reduce payroll by the amount the company is now spending. are we?

so knowing that, if we have no leverage, what would you expect instead of a “pinky swear,” as you put it?
My part of "we" is still considering options until we have an understanding of how much payroll we are discussing. We have a problem with seniority assignments, still.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:27 AM
  #1146  
CX500T's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 640
From: NYC 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Are you reading your own words? What does this mean? We wrote them into compliance, again. Nothing has changed. We got a pinky swear to change.
Y'all keep forgetting the sick lookback gone UFN.

As much as DL likes to throttle sick usage, this pretty much means any sick call doesn't count, even if you get GFBd.

I was going to be on the 120+ lookback until at least next November. Now? I don't need a QHCP to sign off, unless they GFB me, in which case, it gets very spendy very quick.

Also, WHO can sign a QHCP form is forever changed to be more flexible. No longer has to be MD or DO. Can be DC, NP, PA and probably some others I'm forgetting.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:30 AM
  #1147  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
we didn’t write anything into compliance
So what is "further codified previous settlement agreements that the company had been violating" then?
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:34 AM
  #1148  
Abouttime2fish's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Marine Corp
10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 162
From: MD88
Default

Originally Posted by Rinaldi
get rid of auto accept. It’s not that hard.
Auto accept is not the problem, it’s just what the company wants you to think the problem is. The problem is 100% crew schedules and their inability to cover trips in a timely manner. Was not a problem pre-Covid. Kind of like my weak ass FAs that just refused to do service while I had seat belt sign off.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:35 AM
  #1149  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
Y'all keep forgetting the sick lookback gone UFN.

As much as DL likes to throttle sick usage, this pretty much means any sick call doesn't count, even if you get GFBd.

I was going to be on the 120+ lookback until at least next November. Now? I don't need a QHCP to sign off, unless they GFB me, in which case, it gets very spendy very quick.

Also, WHO can sign a QHCP form is forever changed to be more flexible. No longer has to be MD or DO. Can be DC, NP, PA and probably some others I'm forgetting.
Sorry to say... I know this affects you, but sick abuse has always been a PITA for pilots but not a problem for the company. Emotionally for some former leadership because of a few bad actors, maybe. Financially for the company, no. GFB will do the same job 120 verification was doing. Changing the QHCP requirement actually makes this easier for the company in most cases.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:40 AM
  #1150  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
So what is "further codified previous settlement agreements that the company had been violating" then?
it means clarification and agreement about what the rules are.

what, that the company was doing illegally before is now compliant with the mou?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices