MOU 25-05
12-24-2025 | 05:15 AM
#1901
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,481
Likes: 1,055
For every pilot whose name is listed repeatedly in the 23M7 logs, there are 100 other pilots trying to be him/her with the same slip configuration.
The names that you see repeatedly are the ones who happen to be the most senior of that large group, AND in the right place at the right time. They literally have no control over how many times they appear relative to everyone else.
Direct your hate at the game, not the player.
The names that you see repeatedly are the ones who happen to be the most senior of that large group, AND in the right place at the right time. They literally have no control over how many times they appear relative to everyone else.
Direct your hate at the game, not the player.
12-24-2025 | 05:19 AM
#1902
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 1,103
12-24-2025 | 05:24 AM
#1903
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,481
Likes: 1,055
You'll never know what bartering was made in section 6. I'm not saying we should immediately exchange but this is a bad argument that is setting up the entire scenario for failure
12-24-2025 | 05:28 AM
#1904
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 1,103
Giving away our greatest piece of leverage before section 6 would be the worst strategic blunder we could possibly make.
As the costs of management’s blunder continue to grow by the day, so does our section 6 leverage. Management wants it fixed now. We shouldn’t even entertain that without a new comprehensive contract that blows the rest of the industry out of the water.
12-24-2025 | 05:44 AM
#1905
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,540
Likes: 506
Will we have a contract sooner if the company needs it to solve trip coverage?
If there isn't trip coverage pressure, can the company drag their feet in negotiations?
12-24-2025 | 05:48 AM
#1906
Can’t find crew pickup
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 194
Most pilots are wise enough to evaluate the deal in its entirety.
Giving away our greatest piece of leverage before section 6 would be the worst strategic blunder we could possibly make.
As the costs of management’s blunder continue to grow by the day, so does our section 6 leverage. Management wants it fixed now. We shouldn’t even entertain that without a new comprehensive contract that blows the rest of the industry out of the water.
Giving away our greatest piece of leverage before section 6 would be the worst strategic blunder we could possibly make.
As the costs of management’s blunder continue to grow by the day, so does our section 6 leverage. Management wants it fixed now. We shouldn’t even entertain that without a new comprehensive contract that blows the rest of the industry out of the water.
NEWS FLASH: CS does now GAF who is getting paid what as long as the metal is moving.
The company would love to get the coverage ladder retooled to be more efficient, but there’s a ton of pilots who are completely missing out and getting screwed that want it more.
12-24-2025 | 05:52 AM
#1907
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,540
Likes: 506
Look, with pilots tripping over themselves and playing wait on hold games in the hopes of getting an IA, I don’t think we have remotely close to the leverage you think we have. The planes are flying, someone is getting paid.
NEWS FLASH: CS does now GAF who is getting paid what as long as the metal is moving.
The company would love to get the coverage ladder retooled to be more efficient, but there’s a ton of pilots who are completely missing out and getting screwed that want it more.
NEWS FLASH: CS does now GAF who is getting paid what as long as the metal is moving.
The company would love to get the coverage ladder retooled to be more efficient, but there’s a ton of pilots who are completely missing out and getting screwed that want it more.
12-24-2025 | 05:57 AM
#1908
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,481
Likes: 1,055
It's not about the exact quid, it's about the pressure to get a full contract completed in a timely manner.
Will we have a contract sooner if the company needs it to solve trip coverage?
If there isn't trip coverage pressure, can the company drag their feet in negotiations?
Will we have a contract sooner if the company needs it to solve trip coverage?
If there isn't trip coverage pressure, can the company drag their feet in negotiations?
12-24-2025 | 06:10 AM
#1909
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 1,103
Look, with pilots tripping over themselves and playing wait on hold games in the hopes of getting an IA, I don’t think we have remotely close to the leverage you think we have. The planes are flying, someone is getting paid.
NEWS FLASH: CS does now GAF who is getting paid what as long as the metal is moving.
The company would love to get the coverage ladder retooled to be more efficient, but there’s a ton of pilots who are completely missing out and getting screwed that want it more.
NEWS FLASH: CS does now GAF who is getting paid what as long as the metal is moving.
The company would love to get the coverage ladder retooled to be more efficient, but there’s a ton of pilots who are completely missing out and getting screwed that want it more.
The leverage present is massive. Of course the underpaid, overworked crew scheduler doesn’t care. Executive management 100% does.
12-24-2025 | 06:13 AM
#1910
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 317
I’m opposite. I’m willing to give up auto accept and have unlimited batch sizes if they change 23.M.7 to pay protecting every single pilot with a slip in when used or remove it from contract outright. I’m not willing to wait years for a fix. The financial loss is too great. About $8,000 per month for me amd that doesn’t include the profit sharing loss. It’s probably closer to $10,000 per month. So yeah, I’m not going quietly. I’ve also written my reps and been into chief pilots’ office about this.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
