Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2026 | 08:09 AM
  #2121  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,231
Likes: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Not being excessive is absolutely fair. Too much and it's not funny anymore. "Would this annoy Fangs" is a reasonable Rubicon
Actual LOL. I'm easily plied by good humor.
Reply
Old 01-09-2026 | 11:06 PM
  #2122  
Mother’s finest
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 311
Likes: 8
From: 220A
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Correct and because it’s called “inverse assignment,” we have junior pilots that think they are entitled to the premium trips first. They are ignoring the fact that the company is skipping the entire trip coverage ladder.

I heard a rumor that the company made $100 million in 23.M.7 payments in December alone. I remember the company getting angry because it thought the pilot group was abusing sick leave by $42 million per yer. This is shaping up to be $1.2 billion per yer. My prediction is we get a contract 6 months early because the company needs this fixed ASAP.
it will definitely be the “must fix” for the company.

Or they’ll just unilaterally disable Auto Accept and take it to mediation claiming clogging the system wasn’t the intent.
Reply
Old 01-10-2026 | 03:26 AM
  #2123  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,231
Likes: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by SawF16
it will definitely be the “must fix” for the company.

Or they’ll just unilaterally disable Auto Accept and take it to mediation claiming clogging the system wasn’t the intent.
Dont give them any ideas. Seriously… 😬
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 06:08 PM
  #2124  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 17
Likes: 16
Cool

Originally Posted by SawF16
Or they’ll just unilaterally disable Auto Accept and take it to mediation claiming clogging the system wasn’t the intent.
We aren't 2nd-order thinking everyone!!!

Even if Delta disabled auto accept or if the MEC voted in a MOU to get rid of it (god forbid), pilots will still MANUALLY raise their hand for close-in coverage. Yes --- pilot's won't be able to put their phones in DND overnight with auto-accept on like many do now. But when the phone rings and there's a chance for M7, pilots will absolutely raise their hand in ARCOS. I see some doing it now yet never fly anything after being awarded a trip.

The cat is out of the bag. Pilot's are 100% forcing the company to invoke 23M7 in hopes of being the paid pilot. Once QS gets here, have at it! As a pilot who lives ~2 hrs. from base, I think having 200 OOBWS pilots with AA will help many in base pilots get their crack at QS #2, #3 etc. Time will tell. Not sure about you all but I would be okay with ALL same-day OT getting awarded as QS. Larger categories will 100% have that ability to force the issue. It's snowballing to that point now with IA (albeit with the free-for-all, non-seniority & deal making bs).

For those of you all upset about this new paradigm shift, I'm sorry. Take the 50,000' view. This hurts the company way more than it hurts the pilot group. The entire pilot group as a WHOLE is making MORE $ due this new normal. I understand you may not be, but I'm guessing that you can afford it. Getting furious about your missed GS for a couple of months is short term thinking. Get onboard or just keep complaining, but 23M7 is not going to change any time soon. For the near term it will just continue to snowball. But hey.... maybe just maybe you can learn about becoming a farmer and make up some of that difference?! All jokes aside, once QS gets here (hopefully in 2/3 months) much of the pilot pain points of this trip coverage mess we are in get mostly solved. Remember.... we are in for the long game!!!

FWIW, I spoke to my rep today and they said the $100M figure for December was VERY inflated. He wouldn't give me the exact figure they had but said even though it's no where near $100M/month it's still absolutely getting noticed. That's a wonderful thing for section 6!

H-O-L-D T-H-E L-I-N-E







P.S. And for the record, I'm 100% on-board with this all changing and being "fixed" in the next contract. But it better not come free (a la batch sizes)!!!
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 06:14 PM
  #2125  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 345
Default

^^^ I agree.
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 09:01 PM
  #2126  
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 177
Default

Originally Posted by IflyAeroPlanes
).
For those of you all upset about this new paradigm shift, I'm sorry. Take the 50,000' view. This hurts the company way more than it hurts the pilot group. The entire pilot group as a WHOLE is making MORE $ due this new normal. I understand you may not be, but I'm guessing that you can afford it. Getting furious about your missed GS for a couple of months is short term thinking. Get onboard or just keep complaining, but 23M7 is not going to change any time soon. For the near term it will just continue to snowball. But hey.... maybe just maybe you can learn about becoming a farmer and make up some of that difference?! All jokes aside, once QS gets here (hopefully in 2/3 months) much of the pilot pain points of this trip coverage mess we are in get mostly solved. Remember.... we are in for the long game!!!
H-O-L-D T-H-E L-I-N-E

Just pass the cake….
Come on Milton, “you can afford a missed GS”.

Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 10:11 PM
  #2127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 317
Default

Originally Posted by IflyAeroPlanes
We aren't 2nd-order thinking everyone!!!

Even if Delta disabled auto accept or if the MEC voted in a MOU to get rid of it (god forbid), pilots will still MANUALLY raise their hand for close-in coverage. Yes --- pilot's won't be able to put their phones in DND overnight with auto-accept on like many do now. But when the phone rings and there's a chance for M7, pilots will absolutely raise their hand in ARCOS. I see some doing it now yet never fly anything after being awarded a trip.

The cat is out of the bag. Pilot's are 100% forcing the company to invoke 23M7 in hopes of being the paid pilot. Once QS gets here, have at it! As a pilot who lives ~2 hrs. from base, I think having 200 OOBWS pilots with AA will help many in base pilots get their crack at QS #2, #3 etc. Time will tell. Not sure about you all but I would be okay with ALL same-day OT getting awarded as QS. Larger categories will 100% have that ability to force the issue. It's snowballing to that point now with IA (albeit with the free-for-all, non-seniority & deal making bs).

For those of you all upset about this new paradigm shift, I'm sorry. Take the 50,000' view. This hurts the company way more than it hurts the pilot group. The entire pilot group as a WHOLE is making MORE $ due this new normal. I understand you may not be, but I'm guessing that you can afford it. Getting furious about your missed GS for a couple of months is short term thinking. Get onboard or just keep complaining, but 23M7 is not going to change any time soon. For the near term it will just continue to snowball. But hey.... maybe just maybe you can learn about becoming a farmer and make up some of that difference?! All jokes aside, once QS gets here (hopefully in 2/3 months) much of the pilot pain points of this trip coverage mess we are in get mostly solved. Remember.... we are in for the long game!!!

FWIW, I spoke to my rep today and they said the $100M figure for December was VERY inflated. He wouldn't give me the exact figure they had but said even though it's no where near $100M/month it's still absolutely getting noticed. That's a wonderful thing for section 6!

H-O-L-D T-H-E L-I-N-E







P.S. And for the record, I'm 100% on-board with this all changing and being "fixed" in the next contract. But it better not come free (a la batch sizes)!!!
Easy to tell everyone else to hold the line. I am personally losing at least 21 hours per month in earnings. Those 21 hours used to required half a day’s work. Watching my trips go to pilots almost two decades junior to me is infuriating.

That being said I am not engaging in dealmaking, am not struggling financially, and can afford to live without premium pay. It still doesn’t make it right. Losing $50-100k in earnings isn’t chump change.
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 10:35 PM
  #2128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 482
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Easy to tell everyone else to hold the line. I am personally losing at least 21 hours per month in earnings. Those 21 hours used to required half a day’s work. Watching my trips go to pilots almost two decades junior to me is infuriating.

That being said I am not engaging in dealmaking, am not struggling financially, and can afford to live without premium pay. It still doesn’t make it right. Losing $50-100k in earnings isn’t chump change.
Thoughts and prayers. First it took you 15 years to be able to "hold" captain and now this...I hope things turn around for you.
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 02:14 AM
  #2129  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Imma need y'all to stop blaming junior for ANY of this. We ain't the ones clogging up the system. Plenty of us haven't got any IAs or 23M7. I'm just here sulking in my juniority 🎻

Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 03:32 AM
  #2130  
Viper25's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 291
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Thoughts and prayers. First it took you 15 years to be able to "hold" captain and now this...I hope things turn around for you.
Why say this? He’s right. It sucks that the normal paradigm has changed unexpectedly. It sucks to lose money that was typically there under fair conditions.

Saying that a trip went to someone two decades junior to him isn’t blaming the junior person as the cause; it is lamenting the fact that patiently-earned seniority no longer carries weight.

All of that is valid.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices