Notices

Openers today?

Old Today | 03:19 PM
  #1291  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,315
Likes: 1,321
Default

Originally Posted by Bazinga
A C44 rep was in the A lounge yesterday. His take was to expect a comm by Sunday if not sooner. That’s what he was pushing for at least.
Eeek. I see no reason they can’t have one out the evening of any decision. Pre-author 2 comms, and publish the one that applies.

If they delay, I sure hope any rep emails between decision time and comm time don’t deflect. Inquiring minds want to know, especially if we are going with the short path (which I think most everyone doubts). It doesn’t require details immediately, just a quick note will do (or leak).
Reply
Old Today | 03:38 PM
  #1292  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 298
Likes: 208
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
I absolutely shudder to think what new “interpretations” they will try to solve this fire, both from a coverage standpoint (see DJ’s email today, specifically mentioning crew cancellations) or from a cost perspective (23M7 AND premium).

More likely, he didn’t have the budget authority to make the deal required to fix it - but is deflecting with excuses.
I laugh at the idea of the Gummster trying to fix our problems with no deal. Mainly because that would require significant pilot buy-in and I don’t think he realizes the number of pilots willing to extend into min rest reroutes or keep their phone on for the daily 3am panic coverage blasts is dwindling by the day. Even the most seasoned hustlers I chat with are getting tired of it and don’t have the energy to keep volunteering on their days off to put out fires.

I also laugh because in the El Niño cycle, we’re currently in the lowest of the low weather event cycle and as soon as we hit legitimately bad weather things are going to crash even harder than the blue-sky irops we’ve recently seen.

Also consider the fact that hiring isn’t a magic bullet because many of our problems aren’t solved even with infinite reserves. Not to mention the cost (min guarantee) of 2400 more pilots on payroll is actually greater than the $20 million/mo price tag of 23m7. No way around it.

I’m sure the majority of us don’t want to see summer turn into another nuclear catastrophe but sadly that’s what it might take for management to wise up to gummster’s lies and hand waving. I still laugh at his quote about 2 minute average hold times. Why not publish and track the longest hold times experienced each month? Mean/median/mode? Then maybe someone higher up can actually give you the resources you need, maybe. If he’s pulling enough mental gymnastics for that small ego-driven cover, imagine the magnitude of other lies he’s feeding to management.
Reply
Old Today | 03:56 PM
  #1293  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,315
Likes: 1,321
Default

Originally Posted by immolated
...I still laugh at his quote about 2 minute average hold times. Why not publish and track the longest hold times experienced each month? Mean/median/mode? Then maybe someone higher up can actually give you the resources you need, maybe. If he’s pulling enough mental gymnastics for that small ego-driven cover, imagine the magnitude of other lies he’s feeding to management.
LOL, this is the same management that takes an ugly statistic that shows nearly half of all 'pay inquiries' result in a pilot being due pay, and water that down with 35,000 regular pay transactions to get the statistic down to 2%, and then tout that as if it's a win! Talk about gaslighting! How stupid do they think we are?
Reply
Old Today | 04:23 PM
  #1294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,138
Likes: 555
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
I absolutely shudder to think what new “interpretations” they will try to solve this fire, both from a coverage standpoint (see DJ’s email today, specifically mentioning crew cancellations) or from a cost perspective (23M7 AND premium).

More likely, he didn’t have the budget authority to make the deal required to fix it - but is deflecting with excuses.
DJ's email was a little more humble than RGs usual comms though. Admitting there's a problem at least. Especially the part about having the customer service/reservations team help crew scheduling learn how to deal with high call volumes to reduce long pilot wait times. RG couldn't even admit that there was a problem.
Reply
Old Today | 04:46 PM
  #1295  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 179
Likes: 90
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
DJ's email was a little more humble than RGs usual comms though. Admitting there's a problem at least. Especially the part about having the customer service/reservations team help crew scheduling learn how to deal with high call volumes to reduce long pilot wait times. RG couldn't even admit that there was a problem.
That’s why DJ is rumored to being groomed to replace Ed.
Reply
Old Today | 05:03 PM
  #1296  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 68
Likes: 96
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
I don’t think a quick deal is happening, we will see what is communicated after the MEC is briefed.

i doubt RG is getting specific orders on what deal to make from above. He is likely given a budget and goals. If he can’t make those there will not be a quick deal (just like if ALPA cannot get their goals)

they have their scapegoat. They can blame every self induced operations failure on gas and will not get pushback, they are already reducing the schedule which gives him breathing room.

The only way a quick deal works is if both sides can see a win-win. The idea of a win-win is not of interest to people who think that the other side winning automatically means you lost.
I'm skeptical of a quick deal too, but I'd be surprised with how badly RG has been running things (not just in our opinion, in his bosses' opinions) if they're giving him free reign to do what he thinks is best. Because what he thinks is best has gotten us into this absolute disaster.

That's also why when I hear he thinks he can fix it on his own, it just doesn't pass the sniff test in my opinion. I think a lot of the decision will be out of his incompetent hands. Again, that's doesn't mean we're getting a quick deal, but I question how much leeway he has.
Reply
Old Today | 05:30 PM
  #1297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 219
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by Delta757
I'm skeptical of a quick deal too, but I'd be surprised with how badly RG has been running things (not just in our opinion, in his bosses' opinions) if they're giving him free reign to do what he thinks is best. Because what he thinks is best has gotten us into this absolute disaster.

That's also why when I hear he thinks he can fix it on his own, it just doesn't pass the sniff test in my opinion. I think a lot of the decision will be out of his incompetent hands. Again, that's doesn't mean we're getting a quick deal, but I question how much leeway he has.
I don’t know. I would hope he is being watched very closely, but it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that his bosses are accepting his excuses for failure. Or that they will continue to let him run things into the ground until they decide to fire him.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Military
11
10-07-2011 02:53 PM
SrfNFly227
Regional
48
06-11-2009 09:02 PM
jungle
Money Talk
2
02-19-2009 07:50 PM
Longbow64
Flight Schools and Training
18
12-19-2007 05:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices