1 C 9... isn't that saying we will operate with fewer than two pilots?

The Company will accept the integrated
9 seniority list produced under Association merger policy, provided that none
10 of the attendant conditions and restrictions therein:
[blah blah]
20 d. significantly increase the Company's costs,
[blah blah]

Really? If the company has to spend money for a list we negotiate, it can refuse it?

Really?

ACL, good post.

I did say I'd take 4/8.5/3/3 if we got paid by the duty
hour. Thats true but also a joke because if we got that we'd have new hires buying a caddilac a month.

So I'll wait to read it. I do think some regular pilots should take a moment and grab their pay from previous months so we can TRY to apply new work rules with pay. I'll give them a momentary benefit of doubt that maybe the work rules make 4% into something much higher than now.

That said... this whole thing ain't exactly giving me hope it'll get much better. I think I am ready to go-around on this.

1 D 9 looks... meatier.

But here's a morsel for you FM survivors:

e. The Company will only be excused from compliance with the minimum ratio of
24 MBH to DBH:
25 1) if it was projected to be in compliance with the minimum ratio of MBH to
26 DBH in both of the preceding six month projection periods (i.e., both the
27 January 1 and July 1 projections of the preceding 12 months), or
28 2) in the event a circumstance over which the Company does not have control is
29 the cause of such noncompliance.

I'm proud of my Council 1 reps. This PMDL transplant in MSP is very thankful! They obviously listened to their membership. A big NO and a card has been sent to order some donuts.

It is not a N v S thing and leave it right there.

As a top 20 at CPZ with a possibility of flowing how can I get a copy of the TA?
Very interested in looking at this TA just like my buddy Junglebus

Thanks Bid!

Essentially the small jet scope goes like this, if I read it correctly.

Right now they're permitted 153 76 seaters and 255 70+ seaters total. Once the fleet count goes up, they can 'convert' 3 70 seaters to 3 76 seaters, up to the hard cap of 255.

Currently, there's no snap back, so once they're on the property, they're here to stay.

If the total mainline hulls is, for instance, 40 below the cutoff. The company adds 100 aircraft. That puts the number of additional 76 seat jets 60 over the cutoff, so that's 60 x
3 = 180 for a total of 333 76 seaters. But this would be capped at 255 due to the hardcap. In reality, the company only needs to add 34 hulls over the cutoff to get all 255 at 76 seats.

They could then park those airplanes in short order, and you're left sucking it with 255 large jets.

The way I read the new TA, the current caps remain unless the aircraft ponies up the new hulls. It's tied to block hours and there is a snap back. The hard cap is lowered from 255
to 223.

Assuming the company was going to order the 100 seaters anyway, you'd wind up with fewer large RJs under the TA than the current book, and there are snap back provisions.

NOT A YES VOTER, just trying to understand the NC's reasoning.

Nu

At least we're getting X:XX hours for training.

X:XX? What are we, Romans? Or did we forget to wrap this thing up?