|
|
Originally Posted by Waves
(Post 1193308)
In reply to WAGMAN: TO's letter says 32 less 76 seaters. Is this incorrect? His letter makes it sound like the scope is better. Is it false?
|
I disagree that this early opener was an "opportunity" for anyone other than management. If anything, this TA represents an OPPORTUNITY LOST for restoration of pay and benefits to levels that even begin to resemble a career at SWA, FedEX or UPS.
|
Originally Posted by AeroCrewSolut
(Post 1193298)
I wonder what will happen to Pinnacle, Mesaba and Comair's 50 seat jets? Delta just gave 74 million in DIP financing to Pinnacle. Delta can wipe out all the 50 seat jets at Pinnacle/Mesabe for non-compliance. Delta can wipe out all the 50 seats jets at Comair. I wonder what will happen next? Why do the pilots have to bail out management mistakes??
Comair- 100- 50 seat jets www.airlinepilotcentral.com/airlines/regional/comair.html Pinnalce- 124- 50 seat jets www.airlinepilotcentral.com/airlines/regional/pinnacle.html Mesaba- 13- 50 seat jets www.airlinepilotcentral.com/airlines/regional/mesaba.html |
OK, I’m glad you guys are on top of this, but I’m still in my normal confused state. Ha I’m still trying to figure out the IRS tax code changes. LOL I think for several years the crooked line in the sand standard has been based on the 76 seater. What I’m hearing here is that an increase in 70 seaters is a No-Go issue. Where do you guys draw the line regarding seat count? I’m not sure I would disagree, but I’d like to hear an opposing view. I would actually like to see ALL aircraft in our system flown by DAL pilots, but it seems like an unrealistic idea.
|
Originally Posted by 944Turbo
(Post 1193272)
I'm proud of my Council 1 reps. This PMDL transplant in MSP is very thankful! They obviously listened to their membership. A big NO and a card has been sent to order some donuts.
|
Thank you, that is what I was saying. The 50 seaters are gone anyway so why should this be something good. BTW: My hope is that U guys will be incorporated into DAL mainline so we have one airline instead of a "them against us" scenario.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1193335)
Good for you. Enjoy your BK rates on the Mad Dog for another 5 years.
I think you might wanna lighten up a little. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1193294)
This thing is supposed to ride on the details, and Section 1, because it certainly isn't going to ride on the rates, right?
If so, who thought it would be a good idea to give a 477-page reading assignment, where the details are buried? I can't even get my brain to latch on to Section 1. Every time I think I've got it, it runs into an "excused compliance" clause, and I freeze up as I need to reboot. Still keeping an open mind, but TO's letter and the delivery of this thing... not good. (And this is not a comment on YOU Sink...) |
Originally Posted by TheWagman
(Post 1193289)
Unbelievable. The ta is now on the website and in the scope section it says if the company gets a new narrowbody plane type they can go up to a total of 223 76 jets with still 102 70 seat jets. That's right 70 more 76 seaters!!! HELL NO!
Baja. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1193296)
Can you say "meet and confer?"
Company will hire 35% of new hires in Delta pilot new-hire classes in each trailing twelve month period (to the extent airmen are available) with ALPA-represented airmen at Delta Connection Carriers, subject to such airmen meeting the Company’s competitive hiring standards, and subject to the Company’s objectives for diversity and experience among newly hired pilots. Airmen who flow up pursuant to LOA #24 and LOA #25 count toward satisfaction of such minimum percentage. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands