Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
SWA gets 6:30 a min/day. 19:30 for a 3 day trip vs 13;30. We can do better than this. Live in base and this might be acceptable. Commuting to fly 13:30 trips will have you working 17 days on for a 75 hour month.
One suggestion I had in my survey was a 5 hr min day for domestic and a 6+hr one for international.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Of course, some already shiver to wonder how much we'll pay for this...
Just talking pay rates
Delta Current Rates 12yr CA ER 188.96 737-800 181.20 12yr FO- ER 129.06 73-8 123.76
Delta May 00 for 12 yr CA- ER 213.74 737-800 201.65 12yr FO- ER 145.98 73-8 137.73
Delta Jan 2013 12 yr CA- ER 213.22 737-800 204.47 12yr FO- ER 145.63 73-8 139.65
Delta Jan 2015 12 yr CA- ER 226.21 737-800 216.92 12yr FO- ER 154.50 73-8 148.16
SWA 12 yr CA- 216.00 12 yr FO- 151.00
FedEx 12 yr CA 777+ 254.00 757 218.00 12yr FO 777+ 182.00 757 161.00
FedEx 15 yr CA 777+ 261.00 757 225.00 15 yr FO 777+ 185.00 757 163.00
Delta Current Rates 12yr CA ER 188.96 737-800 181.20 12yr FO- ER 129.06 73-8 123.76
Delta May 00 for 12 yr CA- ER 213.74 737-800 201.65 12yr FO- ER 145.98 73-8 137.73
Delta Jan 2013 12 yr CA- ER 213.22 737-800 204.47 12yr FO- ER 145.63 73-8 139.65
Delta Jan 2015 12 yr CA- ER 226.21 737-800 216.92 12yr FO- ER 154.50 73-8 148.16
SWA 12 yr CA- 216.00 12 yr FO- 151.00
FedEx 12 yr CA 777+ 254.00 757 218.00 12yr FO 777+ 182.00 757 161.00
FedEx 15 yr CA 777+ 261.00 757 225.00 15 yr FO 777+ 185.00 757 163.00
I apologize if it's off.
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
True but this really does not help all the LAX 73 guys who start their three day trips with red-eyes. Yeah, I know there are some that sign in prior to 2200 (not very many) and I wouldn't be surprised if these slowly get pushed back to after a 2200 sign in. Gate availability may limit a quick change but over time all the originating red-eyes will probably sign in later than 2200.
The flights that sign in earlier than 2200 for the most part do not fly to hubs so there is no limitation imposed with connecting flights. Yes aircraft and gates will have to be adjusted but it can be done.
Bottom Line for the LAX 73N Guys: Sorry, but for the most part you will be among the few DAL Pilots still flying the 10:30 hour three day trips.

Scoop
True, and it is something I am weighing. There is a lot of reason to think about this. The converse is true too. Would they stay stick it, and then go ahead with their plans anyway, leaving us out in the cold, and not enjoying any of the improvements? Honest question all need to answer, and not one based on anger or fear
(There are a lot of changes in here that are impressive, and the actual costing is always higher than the modeling)
(There are a lot of changes in here that are impressive, and the actual costing is always higher than the modeling)
And I don't know why this has to be done quicker than the 717 deal was done. Seems just as big a deal.
Also, about 2015. If we pass this and in 2015 the economy is going gangbusters and they've merged us with Hawaiian or what have you, they'll probably have everything right where they want and then move to a long drawn out section 6 because that's a better deal for them if the economy is good. There's nothing here to me that says this is step 1 of 2 to restoration of anything.
Please don't mix fearful with thoughtful. RA and DL can just step away from this and stonewall us for a long time. The NMB probably will say the company bargained in good faith and we could well be into contract 2015 by then, that is a possibility to a no vote just as getting a better deal if we vote it down is a possibility. What is all this leverage you talk about ?, the only leverage I see is a happy pilot group would probably be more productive for the company in the long run. There is risk in a no vote, there is risk in a yes vote but don't say there is no risk or revert to name calling.
And if they do get mad and draw this out, I'm okay with that. I'd rather have this contract then that one.
You know once they have 325 large RJs, won't that be 70 or so more than the number of DC-9s and 732s that the two airlines had combined 15 years before?
FtB: That is one of my concerns.
I also am not naive enough to realize that joint application for mediation means they will accept it. I fully expect to tell us to go back and talk for another year to a year and a half.
They also would probably do that in March.
We all know consolidation is coming. We all know that DAL wants to be a player. We know Anderson thinks way outside the box, and the next event may not be an airline, assets or a combination thereof. We do know that they need access to capital and with the debt where it is at; they can't. I am sure as the day is long that redoing these CPA's and leases change that debt figure significantly.
I also am not naive enough to realize that joint application for mediation means they will accept it. I fully expect to tell us to go back and talk for another year to a year and a half.
They also would probably do that in March.
We all know consolidation is coming. We all know that DAL wants to be a player. We know Anderson thinks way outside the box, and the next event may not be an airline, assets or a combination thereof. We do know that they need access to capital and with the debt where it is at; they can't. I am sure as the day is long that redoing these CPA's and leases change that debt figure significantly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




