Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2012, 03:44 PM
  #100851  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer View Post
Management will park more of the existing mainline fleet. The snapshot for ratios doesn't occur for a couple years. Everything in this new proposal that can be exploited will be. The above math equation will go lurching off into left field.
This is incorrect. The snapshot does NOT occur for a couple years. It happens quicker then that. I respect your right to vote NO, but please don't put out false info.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 03:45 PM
  #100852  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL73n's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 737n/FO
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
Yes, current 3 day trips with an allnighter attached at the end will be worth 13:30 instead of 11 hours. That is an improvement for many 737 and 767 pilots.
Except for one big whole - the 4:30 doesn't apply if you report after 2200 and we already have a number of rotations that have a late report and you can't tell me they won't move some of the rotations with earlier reports to a later report to save a few bucks - can certainly see it.
DAL73n is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 03:48 PM
  #100853  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin View Post
I think I agree with Carl on this one
Hey, it had to happen eventually.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 03:49 PM
  #100854  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Dismayed
Posts: 1,594
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
Do you have facts to back up your claim on us giving up 300 positions? I haven't seen that released by the union.
It's a number I got from my rep. They hope that it will be mitigated by the buyout to be offered to the fogeys (my word not his).
dragon is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 03:51 PM
  #100855  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
Default

Originally Posted by bigbusdriver View Post
631 total RJs (unlimited 50 seat and Q-400s allowed):

376 50s 18,800 seats
102 70s 7,140 seats
153 76s 11,628 seats

Total= 37,568 seats

With TA: 450 RJs Capped

125 50s = 6,250
102 70s = 7,140 seats
223 76s (32 less) = 16,948

Scope up or Scope down?
Allowing management to dump 250 old, inefficient RJs they've been dying to get rid of anyways and letting them by 70 new, efficient, 757-CASM mainline replacement jets they've been dying to get their hands on? Scope down.

Here's a point I've been thinking about the last day or so. Let's say this passes. 2015 rolls around, now you guys REALLY want a restoration contract, a labor-friendly Prez is still in the white house, and somehow you guys get released to strike. Management has 325 relatively efficient, 2-class airframes with 2000-2300 mi range off your list. I think they could operate a fairly decent coast-to-coast network with those assets through a strike, enough to at least get the HVC's where they're going. Meanwhile they have KLM/Air France, and other codeshare/JVs to move everyone overseas. Sure they'd lose money, but I think they'd be confident they could weather the strike and force you guys to back down. Give up enough scope, you make yourselves irrelevant.
JungleBus is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 03:52 PM
  #100856  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by bigdaddie View Post
Let me throw this out to you. I have no inside information or influence but this is just food for thought. Let's say this TA is resubmitted with the following changes, would it be acceptable?

1) Pay rates +12.8% over current rates at DOS, +4% January 1, 2013, +4% January 1, 2014
2) Profit sharing unchanged (current levels, not TA)
3) +2% to DC plan
4) Section 1 unchanged or REAL improvements, no more 70+ seat RJs
5) This is a biggie to me. AMENDMENT DATE 12/31/2014

This would give productivity improvements the company wants and a contract we don't have to swallow for so many years. Since this TA was negotiated in short order, it may behoove both parties to have shorter contracts with quick paced negotiations in this highly dynamic business environment.

BD
I'd vote YES to that in a heartbeat. But the problem is that we don't have representation in this negotiations. Our union is on the same side of the table as management. That's not a smart a$$ remark, that's my honest assessment.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 03:59 PM
  #100857  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Nice while it lasted
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus View Post
Here's a point I've been thinking about the last day or so. Let's say this passes. 2015 rolls around, now you guys REALLY want a restoration contract, a labor-friendly Prez is still in the white house, and somehow you guys get released to strike. Management has 325 relatively efficient, 2-class airframes with 2000-2300 mi range off your list. I think they could operate a fairly decent coast-to-coast network with those assets through a strike, enough to at least get the HVC's where they're going. Meanwhile they have KLM/Air France, and other codeshare/JVs to move everyone overseas. Sure they'd lose money, but I think they'd be confident they could weather the strike and force you guys to back down. Give up enough scope, you make yourselves irrelevant.
Except then you get into the whole scab thing, flying struck work and all. The situation you describe is a lot messier than you presented.
JobHopper is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 04:03 PM
  #100858  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus View Post
Allowing management to dump 250 old, inefficient RJs they've been dying to get rid of anyways and letting them by 70 new, efficient, 757-CASM mainline replacement jets they've been dying to get their hands on? Scope down.

Here's a point I've been thinking about the last day or so. Let's say this passes. 2015 rolls around, now you guys REALLY want a restoration contract, a labor-friendly Prez is still in the white house, and somehow you guys get released to strike. Management has 325 relatively efficient, 2-class airframes with 2000-2300 mi range off your list. I think they could operate a fairly decent coast-to-coast network with those assets through a strike, enough to at least get the HVC's where they're going. Meanwhile they have KLM/Air France, and other codeshare/JVs to move everyone overseas. Sure they'd lose money, but I think they'd be confident they could weather the strike and force you guys to back down. Give up enough scope, you make yourselves irrelevant.
Another terrific, must read post!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 04:07 PM
  #100859  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
Except then you get into the whole scab thing, flying struck work and all. The situation you describe is a lot messier than you presented.
Wrong. If we vote this in, it will be only because many junior (former RJ pilots) voted YES. Current RJ pilots will view this as the last straw for taking away a bigger chunk of their chance for a mainline job. They will not consider it struck work...they will consider it payback. Book it.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-23-2012, 04:19 PM
  #100860  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,921
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Wrong. If we vote this in, it will be only because many junior (former RJ pilots) voted YES. Current RJ pilots will view this as the last straw for taking away a bigger chunk of their chance for a mainline job. They will not consider it struck work...they will consider it payback. Book it.

Carl
I disagree with you Carl. I think the former regional jet guys realize that this is a scope sell. We do not buy ALPA's argument that getting 70 new 76 seaters that are not currently allowed is good for us. It's the military guys that don't think for themselves that are going to vote this in.
hockeypilot44 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices