![]() |
|
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 1195569)
It's a number I got from my rep. They hope that it will be mitigated by the buyout to be offered to the fogeys (my word not his).
Dumbest way to bargain I've ever seen. Seriously. I am stunned by that "logic". |
OK, thanks. If you're ready to flow...
Originally Posted by JungleBus
(Post 1195654)
You know, that thought actually occurred to me on day one. I thought "you know, if scope really was better like ALPA is saying, that kinda makes the mediocre pay raises defensible." But if ALPA really considered themselves giving up negotiating capital for this section 1, they got taken to the cleaners. The changes to section 1 simply allow management to do what they sorely wanted and needed to do to make outsourcing continue to work: replace old inefficient airframes with efficient new ones. It makes DCI cheaper, and once again makes mainline pilots the choice of last resort.
Regardless, the mechanism for dumping 50-seaters is contingent upon deals with DCI carriers and lessors, and those entities aren't going to let Delta out of contracts without some quid pro quo. Now, Bombardier would probably bend over backwards to trade in 50-seaters for C-Series at mainline, but Skywest wouldn't. You can be livid all day long that we're funding and facilitating the trade of 50-seaters, and you can argue we're not getting paid enough, but you can't argue the company can simply upgauge the fleet without this, or some similar maneuver. You also have to acknowledge they're [deleted] if we do nothing... but we're just as [deleted] if we do nothing. Hence the marginal rates. I stand by the post above, but not too close, because of all the shiIIing... Hope you get to move to Delta soon. Regards, Sink r8. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1195608)
fwiw, the 70 seaters don't seat 70. And frankly, I need to go back and look and see if we have any non 50 seat CRJ-200s.
All Comair 50s seat 50 (this includes the Comair 50s at SKW, ASA, 9E, and XJ, by the way) |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1195676)
Now, Bombardier would probably bend over backwards to trade in 50-seaters for C-Series at mainline, but Skywest wouldn't.
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1195675)
You are where I heard it from, and it makes sense as a number of the NNP work rules are quite concessionary especially from a staffing perspective. It is absolutely asinine to then go negotiate/pay for an early out and *hope* to get a similar number of pilots that are 100% going to retire anyway to retire sooner and calling that a wash. The lost positions will be lost forever and the retirements that maybe would have offset them initially would have occured anyway.
Dumbest way to bargain I've ever seen. Seriously. I am stunned by that "logic". Again, I think we've been conditioned to work harder not smarter. Contracts are to protect us from ourselves I think more than from the Company. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1195687)
What is the cost of breaking contracts with the regionals? Unless DL has signed some poison pill agreements just so that they can't get out of them, I doubt its that much. When DL fired ACA when they tried their little Independance Air stunt, all DL was on the hook for were the leases on the D328 jets. It was easy to replace too.
Do you think they might sue, tough? |
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 1195693)
Apparently, this was part of the survey. Guys wanted to raise the reserve guarantee and have the ability to work more.
Again, I think we've been conditioned to work harder not smarter. Contracts are to protect us from ourselves I think more than from the Company. |
Originally Posted by JungleBus
(Post 1195654)
You know, that thought actually occurred to me on day one. I thought "you know, if scope really was better like ALPA is saying, that kinda makes the mediocre pay raises defensible." But if ALPA really considered themselves giving up negotiating capital for this section 1, they got taken to the cleaners. The changes to section 1 simply allow management to do what they sorely wanted and needed to do to make outsourcing continue to work: replace old inefficient airframes with efficient new ones. It makes DCI cheaper, and once again makes mainline pilots the choice of last resort.
Carl |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1195687)
When DL fired ACA when they tried their little Independance Air stunt, all DL was on the hook for were the leases on the D328 jets. It was easy to replace too.
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1195695)
This is true. If you don't consider it a bad practice to try to break contracts...
Do you think they might sue, tough? Lots of bad blood left in the wake of 10 years of DCI musical chairs. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:02 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands