![]() |
|
T; merger or acquisition, yes, I agree. Fact is Dal needs access to capital to initiate this. Debts too high. Rj's swap solves this. Without it they have less options.
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1206541)
And that is not a bad strategy. I think we all agree that a merger is in our near future.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1206626)
T; merger or acquisition, yes, I agree. Fact is Dal needs access to capital to initiate this. Debts too high. Rj's swap solves this. Without it they have less options.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1206526)
Remember ... our MEC Admin and ALPA President believe outsourcing is good, because Delta pilots share in the profits of outsourcing our labor. Once you understand that truth, then you understand their actions.
Except they won't say it out loud. And they do it slowly. A concession here. An exemption there. Just a handful of business jets. Just a slight delay in enforcing that pesky "production balance". A one time only, "we'll get 'em next time" grievance settlement. alfaromeo says we're getting all worked up over trivial things. He says these things are so small they are comical. Let 'em have a few more 76 seaters. C'mon guys, we're only adjusting the numbers a little bit. Management's in a jam. We can help. Besides, don't look over there. Look over here --> We got ratios. Industry leading ratios. What ALPA is doing to us on scope is truly sad. We are like the proverbial frogs being brought to a gradual boil. We don't catch on and try to jump out of the pan until its too late. We're cooked. Meanwhile it is severe career stagnation for the bottom half of our ever-shrinking list. Then, ultimately ---> will the last Delta pilot please turn out the lights. |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1206645)
Maybe extra pay could be associated with a new JCBA with a future merger partner?(if there is one :) )
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1206656)
I think that is absolutely correct.
Except they won't say it out loud. And they do it slowly. A concession here. An exemption there. Just a handful of business jets. Just a slight delay in enforcing that pesky "production balance". A one time only, "we'll get 'em next time" grievance settlement. alfaromeo says we're getting all worked up over trivial things. He says these things are so small they are comical. Let 'em have a few more 76 seaters. C'mon guys, we're only adjusting the numbers a little bit. Management's in a jam. We can help. Besides, don't look over there. Look over here --> We got ratios. Industry leading ratios. What ALPA is doing to us on scope is truly sad. We are like the proverbial frogs being brought to a gradual boil. We don't catch on and try to jump out of the pan until its too late. We're cooked. Meanwhile it is severe career stagnation for the bottom half of our ever-shrinking list. Then, ultimately ---> will the last Delta pilot please turn out the lights. |
The MOST important part of any contract is SCOPE!
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1206656)
alfaromeo says we're getting all worked up over trivial things.
.... will the last Delta pilot please turn out the lights? |
Contract 2012, aka Frog Boil 2012
|
Originally Posted by 4JetStream
(Post 1206671)
+1! ALPA is pitting both ends against the middle and pocketing the difference!
I'm not a hard "yes" or "no" on C2012. I think our MEC did a very good job balancing the interests of our pilot group in the agreement that was reached. Certainly no one can allege it is a windfall for regional guys, as their numbers will be cut under this plan and the remainder won't make much more flying the 76 seat version of the RJ's. While I understand the staffing protections, the work rule changes in this agreement, as well as the loose language in Section 1 concern me. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands