![]() |
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1206906)
I think you make some "tough love" points here, but to what end? I'd rather be lucky than good?
You got my votes all wrong and I am probably a no voter here. |
|
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1206910)
Thanks, understand negative on the 76-seat jets. So we are in fact allowing a larger jet (CRJ-900) to be outsourced. SWA: 0, CAL: 50 seats only and AA: 50 seats with a few exempted CRJ-700's. So who is our scope better than? US Air?
Maybe we should rethink this TA.... DAL TA 450 capped currently not capped and at 600 UAL/CAL 555 not capped LCC 558 not capped AMR 1113 proposal 794 not capped The APA offer to USAirways 880 not capped The APA offer to management includes 308 51-81 and 352 70 seaters What has 81 seats? CRJ-900 (our 76) or the CRJ-1000 First class with economy and extra legroom. APA is hoping for the best thing to be 660 vs our 325 and you aren't sure what's better? |
Maybe because ACL came up through the RJ ranks and has seen first hand what poor consecutive decisions yield. Have to be careful with this, keep it a profession. If it is allowed to degenerate to the level of blue collar, good luck going forward. Perhaps these post 2007 hires are on to something you are not.
|
Check this out, TA pg. 1-14, line 14. "The company's compliance with the minimum ratio of MBH to DBH will be measured for the first time on July 1, 2014 and then measured again each succeeding July 1 thereafter, ..."
Holy Sierra Batman. So much for block hour protections until the next Section 6. This is just one of many problems I have with this TA . Please make it go away.... Agree APA propellered the pooch. |
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1206922)
Perhaps these post 2007 hires are on to something you are not.
|
^^^ Agree unless we Richard it up. If it makes you feel better I know pilots that have been displaced 6 times, can't hold their original base and have spent half a decade commuting to reserve. Quite honestly not sure what motivates them to stay. Hope?
|
Originally Posted by bigbusdriver
(Post 1206926)
Yes they are on to sustainable and consistent raises and increasing mainline fleet numbers (TA) and rapidly approaching retirements with an increasing DC and no loss of pension to start with. This will be a golden age for his group.
|
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1206929)
^^^ Agree unless we Richard it up. If it makes you feel better I know pilots that have been displaced 6 times, can't hold their original base and have spent half a decade commuting to reserve. Quite honestly not sure what motivates them to stay. Hope?
The Christmas Carol for ACL 2008-2013 ACL at Alaska (would he move to SEA or Mexico?) 17% raise ACL at AWA/LCC probably furloughed and 0% raise (dues still at 1.95%) ACL at AMR junior M88 reserve pilot 1.5% raise furloughed soon see 1113 ACL at CAL 2% raise hates DH rules and trip rigs ACL at Delta 24% raise ER copilot in his base! ACL with the TA 40% raise! ACL at FedEx (might like Subic) 12% raise but wear's shades at night ACL at HAL (lives through 1113) 12% raise not too shabby for mediation but there's that HNL thing ACL at SWA 7% raise (minus type rating) goes to PBR in LAS each year ACL at UAL furloughed misses 4% raise wonders if he gets on the SLI ACL at UPS probably furloughed might get 13% raise |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1206934)
This TA does not guarantee increasing mainline fleet numbers. It does, however, help to ensure that DCI will be around farther in the future.
The NMB is like a bankruptcy judge. They don't care about us they only care about making sure Delta stays in business. Nothing in the TA makes it to the NMB and Delta says wahhhhhhhhhh we need APA's scope after all they came up with it themselves. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands