Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Bucking Bar 10-11-2012 09:04 AM


Originally Posted by Roadkill (Post 1275315)
"Don't worry Bar, you'll get yours soon enough. A lot of us had to wait a long time to upgrade, and I'm happy to use ALPA numbers to support my points, but that ALPA seniority calculator that shows you'll be an FO for 22 years I'll easily dismiss with bland assurances.

It was a joke, please no one take it seriously. I've got plenty enough 121 PIC and am happy to let the Boss deal with dispatch, maintenance, flight attendants, and passenger issues while I get ATIS and think pilot thoughts..

80ktsClamp 10-11-2012 09:26 AM

Ain't no hate like Bar hatin' on the mad dog. As he sits with plenty of padding in a category that is going to be growing like a weed in the next bids with no chance of displacement. ;)

Elvis90 10-11-2012 10:37 AM

Now that I've had nearly a year on the Maddog, there are some things I like:

MD-90
- Reversers - they're awesome, sometimes I don't have to touch the brakes
- Brakes - much more powerful
- Electric paralleling - no more power interruptions

MD-88
- They're all configured the same. MD-90's have too many varieties from too many countries. Where's the cargo fire warning panel? How do I test this transponder?

MD-88/90
- Flaps 23 - Dive Dive Dive!
- It's quieter up front compared to the Bus

I'll be on the Maddog for some time, and I don't mind.

gloopy 10-11-2012 10:40 AM


Originally Posted by dalad (Post 1274905)
Oh, and this one, WE WILL GROW.

We as in the pilots on the DL seniority list, or We as in Skyteam "partners" like Alaska ordering 50 growth planes fo fly as a proxy DCI?

johnso29 10-11-2012 10:44 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1275391)
We as in the pilots on the DL seniority list, or We as in Skyteam "partners" like Alaska ordering 50 growth planes fo fly as a proxy DCI?

They aren't all growth airplanes. 2/3 of them are replacement aircraft.

gloopy 10-11-2012 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by Elvis90 (Post 1275182)
The latest AP article about Alaska's order says 2/3's of the new ones will replace existing aircraft, so it's really a net plus of ~17.

Apply that net growth rate to DL and see how many growth jets that would take. At least we won't merge with them until they get the growth, that way the plug on AK property today will jump thousands of DL numbers.

johnso29 10-11-2012 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1275397)
Apply that net growth rate to DL and see how many growth jets that would take. At least we won't merge with them until they get the growth, that way the plug on AK property today will jump thousands of DL numbers.

So the arbitrator(s) would award straight relative seniority?

gloopy 10-11-2012 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by iceman49 (Post 1275277)

I think it boils down to a difference between not being able to strike with or without cameras on the flight deck audited by management.

Well that and the absolutely worthless rules "helping" unmotivated groups that don't even have 50% willing to cast a vote become "unionized". That does nothing to help the profesion and I hope it stays out of the process.

80ktsClamp 10-11-2012 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1275398)
So the arbitrator(s) would award straight relative seniority?

I seriously doubt that would happen...

TeddyKGB 10-11-2012 11:03 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1275393)
They aren't all growth airplanes. 2/3 of them are replacement aircraft.

It's a net growth of 17 airplanes over the next 10 years. Better than shrinkage.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands