![]() |
|
Originally Posted by FIIGMO
(Post 1277800)
Flown with him TOO!!:eek:
|
I thought there were no..."former" Marines?
But I hope you asked him, "What, you couldn't get in the Navy?" ;^) |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1277789)
You're right, management sets the policies and the tone. I can understand this author's frustration, but on the other hand it can have consequences to other passengers "downstream" when the aircraft is on its 6th leg of the day.
We've waited several times for connecting passengers this last week when I was flying. I know as a commuter on AA and American Eagle that it's Eagles policy to shut the door 10 minutes prior to departure; I don't get upset anymore, it simply is the policy. That is one thing DAL (and a lot of other companies can do better) - train front line employees better and empower them to think on their feet and make decisions: Flight to JFK with 30 connecting international passengers: "Sorry, we have to go." Last flight to Palookaville with no connections: "Folks we have a few connecting passengers who will be here in 5 minutes - we are going to wait for them." I am starting to see the later on occasion and hopefully we will continue down this path. There is a risk with empowering employees as they will sometimes make errors but in the long run it can pay great dividends. Scoop |
Gate agents should not (and I don't even think they do) make decisions on when to hold a flight and when to let a flight go. It should all be done in operations, and most likely by a computer. Honestly I think a lot of times the gate agents are doing their job correctly. For instance, lets say in ATL they are missing a passenger. They will look to see where they should be. Lets say they had a 45 minute connection in ATL and it's D-5 and they are not there. I don't have an issue with them closing the door. They need to close up the gate house at D-5 to get an on time departure.
Now if it's someone that had a 20 minute connection and they are closing up shop at D-10, that isn't right. |
Originally Posted by Erdude32
(Post 1277809)
What's up with you guys caring if the dude/dudette in the other seat plays for the other team? Seems kinda juvenile too me. Always amazes me at the level of homophobia once the cockpit door is closed. Doesn't DAL have policies against this?
|
It's all in the delivery. As an airline, we could really soften the blow with a smile and a $5 coupon to Auntie Annie's.
|
Umm, that was a response to Groundstop's post, not Buzz's.
|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1277875)
It's about there relentless political rankings not their sexual orientation. Obviously Rachel Maddow's gay lover would be a chick...the guy I'm referring to is a dude.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1277830)
That is one thing DAL (and a lot of other companies can do better) - train front line employees better and empower them to think on their feet and make decisions:
Flight to JFK with 30 connecting international passengers: "Sorry, we have to go." Last flight to Palookaville with no connections: "Folks we have a few connecting passengers who will be here in 5 minutes - we are going to wait for them." I am starting to see the later on occasion and hopefully we will continue down this path. There is a risk with empowering employees as they will sometimes make errors but in the long run it can pay great dividends. Scoop |
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands