![]() |
|
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1331320)
So now this sounds like a case of trying to protect your friends getting a job at Delta. ....
As for angst, picture yourself leading a night four ship to a tanker and your ejection seat catches on fire at the same time the roll stab aug and yaw stab aug have catastrophic failures leading to random full scale deflection of flight controls. Like so hard your clear visor gets cracked on the canopy followed by your noggin. There is some major league angst my friend. If it were the case that someone was interested in helping their friends, it would not be the first time. As I recall, Chuck Giambusso used similar reasoning when he expressed concerns that ASA & Comair guys would make Delta an undesireable place for military pilots to seek employment. I was trying to explain a concern some of my friends have (after one was on the phone to me bending my ear on the issue). Consider that the DCI carriers are mostly mortal enemies. They fight amongst themselves for the scraps of Delta's left over flying. Those who can't get the scraps end up losing their jobs ... ACA, Comair, Freedom, etc .... I always understood it for what it was, whipsaw. Others take it pretty personally. In the case of GoJets I agree with them because of the harm they did to ALPA and Trans States. Management beats the competitive drums pretty loudly too. My business partner flew a shot up Marine Corps F4, single engine, losing hydraulics to a night trap. "Angst" is not the word I recall he uses when he talks about that night. If that was your ride with the inflight fire, that sounds pretty pucker inducing as well. Certainly nothing here rises to that level, but folks do have opinions about pilot hiring. For the record, it has always been my written opinion that if Delta wants to buy and operate an airline, fine. Make them Delta pilots & give them a number. (so the requirement change is not a personal matter to me ... I'd go as far as to applaud a staple with concomitant closing of "permitted" flying) |
Originally Posted by tim123
(Post 1331218)
The fleet booklet on deltanet says 49 in service with 7 more on order.I wonder did the 65 number get reduced?
|
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1331320)
I still see a tremendous amount of bitterness and anger amongst the various small jet pilot groups and that anger and bitterness does not seem to disappear even after coming to Delta. I just don't understand it, it seems petty and counterproductive.
|
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1331327)
Was there a violation to the PWA? Can you prove delta pilots were harmed with a said violation? If so its a grievance but if not there isn't a violation and is not something that can have a grievance filed over.
There's nothing more powerful than an "I told you so".[/QUOTE] No it's not an ALPA guy tactic. What I am trying to do is when having a concern use the correct word usage and point to the correct document and correct corrective action. The company fufilled their responsibility to the exclusive agent (ALPA) under the rla. The company did not violate our exclusivity as defined by the rla or the PWA. It's I'd not something that can be taken to grievance. Now if there is in fact a section of the PWA that is violated that is a different story. Exclusivity was not. |
Originally Posted by JungleBus
(Post 1331383)
I'm guessing you didn't get why the B-scalers in the 80s were upset, either. Moving it off property doesn't change anything.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1331268)
The military guys probably do not get the angst the civilians are feeling about the affirmative action program for entitled Pinnacle pilots. For the guys who served, sent their resumes to five airlines and went with the first who hired them, let me ' splain.
Most of the civilian pilots paid a huge amount of money to obtain a college degree and obtain the number of hours to make them competitive in the job market. Avoiding college would have meant getting to Delta perhaps five, or six, years earlier (if Delta were hiring). Throw in the post 9/11 interruption, the result of going to college was getting hired in 2009 instead of 1999. Getting to Delta was a 20 year path for my friends. Some friends are still completing the requirements. To have those requirements suddenly change because some f-NWA manager sees an opening to cut regional pay a little is no small let down for those who have put in their time in the school house and delayed their flying career to do so. So now it's a NWA thing????? Get a life things aren't that bad here! |
Originally Posted by hornetsnest
(Post 1331312)
Something false was posted on APC? That can't be possible!
Folks like me who post a lot (~ 6,700) know that people fact check us, research our posts and hold us accountable. It seems you ( 42 posts ) come here when ALPA has political problems deliberately post in such a way as to introduce false issues to distract from the malfeasance of your political friends. ( like your bringing up the RJDC when Dan Ford and Ken Cooksey never dreamed of trying to lock the Delta MEC out of the room like Lee Moak just did to the Delta pilots ... we Delta pilots were completely taken for granted ... not even a "how do you do?" ) A man of integrity looks past the politicians to the real issues. We hope ALPA and Delta will both be here long after our brief time on the stage has passed. The more important issues involve the governance of our union so that it remains an ongoing entity. So, what office do you currently hold on behalf of our association? |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1331254)
Has anyone seen it? The rumor is it says "flow" and factually this agreement is not about flows. If there is a agreement that talks about flows it may be for those that are part of the mesaba flows. Who knows, and that's the point. If you or anyone has a copy of this send it to me.
|
Originally Posted by tim123
(Post 1331482)
The ALPA press release says guaranteed hiring for many Pinnacle pilots.
Have to admit is was funny to have two Status Reps call me a "liar" when I was quoting directly from ALPA's own press releases. :rolleyes: ALPA National has completely taken the complacency of the Delta pilots for granted. They are not even bothering to tell the Delta MEC what they have negotiated with our management. |
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1331332)
What point are you trying to make? That Pinnacle pilots won't have as good a TMAAT story as you and your buddies?
My point was that I am tired of hearing guys that got their experience in the civilian side tell me I don't understand because military guys have it so easy. Somehow they assume that I graduated from high school and then an angel came down from heaven and handed me a diploma, a set of military wings, and my Delta uniform. They say I can't understand the angst of working through the civilian ranks to get to Delta. Flying in the military was difficult and dangerous. The washout rate in UPT is close to 40% or at least it was when I was there. Within three weeks of me showing up at my pilot training base there was a fatal accident. We had about 150 pilots at the last base I was assigned to and there were four fatal accidents in 2.5 years. My life was spent at 100 feet above the ground and 480 KIAS doing high g maneuvering in terrain. I understand angst in the flying world. I don't support the contention that some military pilots have that civilian pilots are weak and unworthy. I also bristle at the suggestion that I had it easy because I went into the military. Finally, I don't understand how settling old grudges between RJ pilot groups becomes the top priority of the Delta MEC. The Pinnacle pilots are in a terrible spot due to no fault of their own, their management was incompetent and left them with two terrible choices. If they get a hand up to get a job at Delta to relieve a portion of that suffering then I support it. It just seems to be the human thing to do. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands