Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Jack Bauer 06-24-2013 05:23 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1434082)
You write that mainline scope clauses have cost 7000 job losses.

What is your take on the number of mainline pilot positions by the following factors:
Elimination of the 727, L-1011, 747 classics and DC-10's
Growth and rapid expansion of SWA, AirTran, and jetBlue in the last 15 years
9/11
Dot Com bubble burst
SARS
US Airline Bankruptcies
Global recession of 2008
European debt problem
Oil prices going from $30/bbl to $120/bbl

Which of the factors listed would have the greatest effect on mainline pilot jobs? Would any one of the items have a greater impact than the others?

I'm still going with outsourced flying at the regionals as the single largest cause of job loss for mainline pilots. As just one example Skywest Airlines had around 9 RJ's in the late nineties and around 500 total pilots. Hundreds of outsourced RJ's and thousands of pilots later...there are actually more departures daily on behalf of Delta via Delta Connection than there are by Delta Air Line pilots. Now go back and review the history and attitude of your union regarding RJ flying before and while it took off, literally and figuratively. They were failed policies then and more failed policies continue today...which has now bled over into large RJ flying, code shares, JV's, Skyteam, etc. ALPA is so worried about keeping the "engaged working relationship", nothing is off limits to be implemented on behalf of management at the expense of mainline pilot jobs.

Delta
Total Daily Flights: 4,684
Mainline Flights: 2,149 — 46%
Outsourced Flights: 2,535 — 54%

Scoop 06-24-2013 05:54 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1434082)
You write that mainline scope clauses have cost 7000 job losses.

What is your take on the number of mainline pilot positions by the following factors:
Elimination of the 727, L-1011, 747 classics and DC-10's
Growth and rapid expansion of SWA, AirTran, and jetBlue in the last 15 years
9/11
Dot Com bubble burst
SARS
US Airline Bankruptcies
Global recession of 2008
European debt problem
Oil prices going from $30/bbl to $120/bbl

Which of the factors listed would have the greatest effect on mainline pilot jobs? Would any one of the items have a greater impact than the others?


Shiz,

Even though many items on your above list also affected DCI, they grew by leaps and bounds at the same time.

Your list is valid, but so is the claim that DCI's rapid growth contributed to Mainline shrinking.
I would also add work-rules and PBS to the list.

Scoop

flyallnite 06-24-2013 06:21 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1434082)
You write that mainline scope clauses have cost 7000 job losses.

What is your take on the number of mainline pilot positions by the following factors:
Elimination of the 727, L-1011, 747 classics and DC-10's
Growth and rapid expansion of SWA, AirTran, and jetBlue in the last 15 years
9/11
Dot Com bubble burst
SARS
US Airline Bankruptcies
Global recession of 2008
European debt problem
Oil prices going from $30/bbl to $120/bbl

Which of the factors listed would have the greatest effect on mainline pilot jobs? Would any one of the items have a greater impact than the others?

Nice list, but passenger enplanements are up quite a bit over the past 15 years, 727's burned gas like a '71 Buick, the blood sucking start ups are all gone and pricing is finally overcoming cost of production. How much did we make from checked bags in 2001? Our oil refinery? How much did we pay our stockholders in dividends? 1 Billion this year...

We have outsourced quite a lot, we've thrown a lifeline to the regionals in the form of relief to fly bigger planes with better economics, and we are bending over backwards to accomodate Joint Venture agreements with airlines that have impressive WB order books while we make do with ever older and smaller iron. So far, our piece of the pie is effectively zero growth, zero raise (after new taxes and profit sharing cuts), and zero hiring.

Wake up DALPA? Does anyone still really believe they haven't been wide awake all along? This is how careers get sold... How many former DALPA types in mgmt? Why bother even trying to pretend you're an agent for the pilots of Delta? Its a lot easier if you just tell me you're spending my dues money selling me out, rather than trying to look like you're not in bed with management.

Carl Spackler 06-24-2013 06:22 PM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 1434074)
Bruther 80!!!! WHen I heard the rumor of 4-8-3-3, I said to myself: "that's way outside of the realm of reality."

9000 is only a number. Our trend is definitely pointing south and at this rate who knows. Our increasing efficiency, as a pilot group, is going to thin out our pilot group.

I will not be surprised if DAL will become a much smaller airline. Our network will be big under the Skyteam umbrella. Our profits will also be big. Excellent business plan, less CAPEX- more profits. DELTA is on its way to become a virtual airline. DALPA needs to wake up.

Here's what I think you might be missing TEN. DALPA has absolutely no will or intent to go against Mr. Moak. None. ALPA national will do exactly what it wishes to do. Exactly what is ALPA's wish? It's primary strategy is to become the union of pilots worldwide. The evidence of that is clear.

Now...tell me why ALPA should care who their dues money comes from - if they're getting all the dues? You guys go ahead and fight amongst yourselves as to who should get what flying in some JV/connection business...just don't forget to select dues check off on those paychecks. You'll never achieve "critical mass" if you appear to be favoring one group over another. You have to "spread the wealth" evenly or the pee-ons might revolt.

Should DALPA "wake up"? Well, that presupposes DALPA doesn't already understand and approve of the strategy. The real question is: Will the line pilots of Delta wake up?

Carl

gloopy 06-24-2013 07:53 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1433177)
After the DAL / NWA merger, age 65, PBS productivity enhancements and scope sales the bottom third of the list is already ten years behind ... We have no tolerance to assimilate anyone ahead of any Delta pilot. Delta's junior pilots are in no mood for further stagnation.

US Air's mess began when a shrinking carrier absorbed a smaller, growing outfit and the majority voted ALPA off the property. I would not put a stupid act of desperation past pilots who will have seen six years of career regression by the time an Alaska deal might be consumated.

Agreed, although that would be a night at a Montreal strip club compared to some other scenarios out there. Good thing for those scenarios is that, if DALPA has the will to fight for its pilots and especially if we can partner with the company like SWA did, such an uber juniority windfall for the other group can easily be avoided depending on how the deal is structured.

newKnow 06-24-2013 07:58 PM

Go Blackhawks! :D :D

gloopy 06-24-2013 08:05 PM


Originally Posted by Jack Bauer (Post 1433370)
Could this new hand flying "practice" in the sim be a result of Air France Flight 447?

"In the agency's final report, which was released today, investigators determined that a combination of technical failures and mistakes made by inadequately trained pilots was responsible for the crash. They recommended that pilots be better trained to manually fly commercial aircraft at high altitudes..."

It seems the First Officer had become so reliant on automation (and was probably trained in one of those european ab initio training cram jobs) he could not recognize what was happening when the airplane entered a stall...calling for the Captain to come help (the Captain was temporarily out of the cockpit). Watch the video with cvr text below and the video that follows.

Air France Flight 447 Crash 'Didn't Have to Happen,' Expert Says - ABC News

Maybe, although there have also been some attempts to defer AP's where crews refused them even though they were legal. I doubt either is the single reason. And honestly, we could all benefit from a re-emphasis on hand flying skills. But I hope we don't take it too far. I've seen guys lately getting cross track errors in nark-ville airspaces like ATL and NYC trying to be hand fly heros. Old school is great, we all get off on it, gutsiest move I ever saw, etc, but this ain't the days of 4 mile airways anymore. Anything with RNAV these days is almost +/- 0.0001 deviation allowed in the eyes of ATC. There are plenty of times to click it all off and get your "Fly The Wing" on, but there are many times, regardless of the visibility, where its a high risk : zero reward exchange. And you know if you're that guy, the company will throw you under the bus in 2 seconds as a rogue cowboy pilot, talking about how you should have used the automation and all that. It takes next to nothing to get dinged these days. Know when to hold em, when to fold em, and know when to couple up and put your pride in your pocket for another day.

Of course since ATC admittingly gives the SWA martyrs mass preference because they valliantly ply the skies without autothrottles (yes, someone actually said that) then maybe this is Flt Ops's way of trying to out impress them. :cool:

forgot to bid 06-24-2013 08:06 PM

I see 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80 hour months for some of the ATL M88 B reserve pilots. I thought going above ALV was a international only thing?

forgot to bid 06-24-2013 08:07 PM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1434174)
Maybe, although there have also been some attempts to defer AP's where crews refused them even though they were legal. I doubt either is the single reason. And honestly, we could all benefit from a re-emphasis on hand flying skills. But I hope we don't take it too far. I've seen guys lately getting cross track errors in nark-ville airspaces like ATL and NYC trying to be hand fly heros. Old school is great, we all get off on it, gutsiest move I ever saw, etc, but this ain't the days of 4 mile airways anymore. Anything with RNAV these days is almost +/- 0.0001 deviation allowed in the eyes of ATC. There are plenty of times to click it all off and get your "Fly The Wing" on, but there are many times, regardless of the visibility, where its a high risk : zero reward exchange. And you know if you're that guy, the company will throw you under the bus in 2 seconds as a rogue cowboy pilot, talking about how you should have used the automation and all that. It takes next to nothing to get dinged these days. Know when to hold em, when to fold em, and know when to couple up and put your pride in your pocket for another day.

Of course since ATC admittingly gives the SWA martyrs mass preference because they valliantly ply the skies without autothrottles (yes, someone actually said that) then maybe this is Flt Ops's way of trying to out impress them. :cool:

All of that is true too.

BigGuns 06-24-2013 08:22 PM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1434171)
Go Blackhawks! :D :D

They so did!!!! Awesome game!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands