![]() |
|
Honest questions...How is our tie up with Virgin different from Alitalia's with AF/KLM in terms of the JV? Could Delta's plan be to include the EASKs flown by Virgin into Delta's percentage and then be in compliance? I hope the JV is for the DAL metal share? Didn't Alitalia's flying get lumped into AF/KLM's share?
Philly |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1468681)
I'm familiar with the entire policy, & I understand your point. So if the old agreement gave the CP the same rights, wouldn't you consider 100 hours of unverified time per year a gain?
My point has been that the new sick policy is better then the old one. |
Originally Posted by Philly
(Post 1468690)
Honest questions...How is our tie up with Virgin different from Alitalia's with AF/KLM in terms of the JV? Could Delta's plan be to include the EASKs flown by Virgin into Delta's percentage and then be in compliance? I hope the JV is for the DAL metal share? Didn't Alitalia's flying get lumped into AF/KLM's share?
Philly An agreement for the Virgin Atlantic JV hasn't even been agreed to yet. So I'm fairly certain that isn't possible. The JV hasn't even officially kicked off yet. AFAIK, we are simply code sharing with Virgin Atlantic right now. |
Originally Posted by Philly
(Post 1468690)
Honest questions...How is our tie up with Virgin different from Alitalia's with AF/KLM in terms of the JV? Could Delta's plan be to include the EASKs flown by Virgin into Delta's percentage and then be in compliance? I hope the JV is for the DAL metal share? Didn't Alitalia's flying get lumped into AF/KLM's share?
Philly One will not impact the other - ie Virgin will not be used to get the company trending back towards compliance. The AF/KLM/AZ JV will have to stand on its own. |
I'm beginning to believe the WB order is just that a rumor and not fact!
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1468699)
An agreement for the Virgin Atlantic JV hasn't even been agreed to yet. So I'm fairly certain that isn't possible. The JV hasn't even officially kicked off yet. AFAIK, we are simply code sharing with Virgin Atlantic right now.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1468596)
As to the 717s, I'd say the union was smart. They knew 717s or 319s were available for a very quick delivery. What if the company picked the C-Series? An airplane that hasn't even flown yet, & is way over budget. |
Originally Posted by firstmob
(Post 1468708)
I'm beginning to believe the WB order is just that a rumor and not fact!
What gives? :confused: |
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 1468719)
Dude, are you a reporter trolling for rumors? A quick scan of your posts shows about 90% one-liners like this asking about a "WB order".
What gives? :confused: |
Originally Posted by firstmob
(Post 1468727)
Just looking at growth and a chance to move up the list.
The rumor mill keeps putting out 10 WBs and 30 NBs are being bid on. Hopefully all of the above happens soon, AND they're growth aircraft. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands