Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2013 | 08:53 AM
  #138801  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
The press release also says this:

The 30 A321s will expand Delta's existing fleet of 126 A320-family domestic aircraft. Delta's first three A321s are scheduled for delivery in the first quarter of 2016, with 12 more due in that year. The remaining 15 jets are scheduled for 2017.
This hints that the 320 airframe life extension comes with part of this. Not a bad thing!

It does not remove the possibility of them replacing the older 757s, though. Reality, johnso!
Old 09-04-2013 | 08:55 AM
  #138802  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by TOGA LK
Well, buddies on the -88 say that with the stab at 10 degrees or more nose up its unaffected by ground effect in the flare. In fact they say its unaffected by any control input at that point. Brace....
They just aren't going fast enough and there might be a limit to what the elevator trim tab is capable of. I've noticed type IV de-ice fluid having some effect on the elevator as well. The design is a highly compromised solution on an aircraft that large and is why they dumped that and went with the ACS on the MD90.

While I joke a lot about that Douglas, I do sincerely believe the margins around V-REF are quite narrow, specially when compared to the Boeing fleet (and probably most anything else but a couple of biz jets). No Certification testing is required for stalls in ground effect. Data is extrapolated from VMU and stall testing in free air to make assumptions about what the airplane might do.

To sell airplanes, manufacturers push these margins nearly as low as they can go to market balanced field length and dispatch flexibility. The operational experience with the Douglas fleet tells us they're safe and Delta operates the type well, but, compared to the Boeings (which are tail geometry limited, not stall limited) the margins are much much tighter on the Douglas (my seat of the pants opinion)
Old 09-04-2013 | 08:59 AM
  #138803  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
They just aren't going fast enough and there might be a limit to what the elevator trim tab is capable of. I've noticed type IV de-ice fluid having some effect on the elevator as well. The design is a highly compromised solution on an aircraft that large and is why they dumped that design and went with the ACS on the MD90.

While I joke a lot about that Douglas, I do sincerely believe the margins around V-REF are quite narrow, specially when compared to the Boeing fleet (and probably most anything else but a couple of biz jets). No Certification testing is required for stalls in ground effect. Data is extrapolated from VMU and stall testing in free air to make assumptions about what the airplane might do.

To sell airplanes, manufacturers push these margins nearly as low as they can go to market balanced field length and dispatch flexibility. The operational experience with the Douglas fleet tells us they're safe and Delta operates the type well, but, compared to the Boeings (which are tail geometry limited, not stall limited) the margins are much much tighter on the Douglas (my seat of the pants opinion)
Correct.. there just isn't enough enough wind going over the stab.

Given your assertions on the Douglas people running Boeing now, I wonder how the margins are on the 787 compared to the 777?
Old 09-04-2013 | 09:02 AM
  #138804  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default



Shark week comes to Delta.



Pretty extensive mod if they roll this out to the entire fleet.
Old 09-04-2013 | 09:03 AM
  #138805  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Correct.. there just isn't enough enough wind going over the stab.

Given your assertions on the Douglas people running Boeing now, I wonder how the margins are on the 787 compared to the 777?
Got no idea. Given it's range, weight and appearance, it looks to be the glider the 777 is or better.
Old 09-04-2013 | 09:03 AM
  #138806  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Default

According to the base visit, the 330s are growth airplanes for now. Staffing calls for 22 pilots per 330.
Old 09-04-2013 | 09:10 AM
  #138807  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Eliminating ALPA is the single biggest thing we could do to help pilots.

So true, yet your group still uses it as the main tactic. A puzzling waste of your time IMO.

Carl
You can twerk a topic like a teetering tightrope walker. Hate is the tool of ALPA??? Really. Eliminating ALPA is your goal (as stated above), it is not starting an independent union. Those of us that have taken the time to read the documents and the forums on the website know the business model is flawed.

The DPA just sent out an update last month that used the words "angered" "upset" "concerned" "upset (again)" and "worried" in talking about how the TWA trial will affect you financially and all of this a few days after having already writen this:

DPA assured the decision makers that DELTA PILOTS DO NOT BEAR ANY INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY in the damages outcome, a position confirmed publicly by ALPA.
You are consumed with talk about ALPA the hater and ALPA the fear monger yet Tim writes to us using nothing but fear that we do all after he wrote on a public website that he told a bank to get one million dollars (pinky finger) that there was no personal liability. Is he lying to the bank or is he lying to us?

This isn't about hate, it's fundamental flaws in the DPA constitution that make it impossible to open up shop:
  • DPA announces dues will be lowered to anywhere between 1%-1.75% depending on where you read the website yet the constitution says they will go up without MEMRAT to 2.25% next year. ALPA can't raise dues today without a vote.
  • They say that FPL is bad yet they increased FPL for all volunteers including those that don't get FPL like that today over today's limits and pay for it out of the budget since they will take that money value assigned to the contract and spread it amongst the pilots. No, wait, make that the reps as the FPL is going up the money would go to them not the CBA.
  • USAPA payed over $7 million in legal fees to SSM&P in less than 4 years after the vote. SSMP&P is charging 50% of their $250 fee, per their contract, with the rest outstanding after certification, yet the DPA has mysteriously paid a number so small that it can only be called incidental costs from the DPA logs. Where's the legal bill?
  • There's a second law firm on the DPA books that has charged more to the DPA than SSM&P so far. Who could that be possible?
  • New hires, pilots returning from disability and MILOA can't be reps for 2 years, nor could a pilot from a merged airline because of the 2 year good standing rule
  • New hires have to pay a maintenance fee their first year. Not about money, right?
  • Look through the USAPA LM2 and see the 6 figure employees they have. You want to know why? That's what good help costs today.
  • "A contract which is understandable, enforceable and beneficial to both parties and should not exceed 200 pages." Really? Beneficial to the company? An iron clad 200 pages?
  • Voting on everything and everybody. Where will you find the time?
  • 25% of the pilots in a block to get a resolution passed vs simply majority at an LEC today? Harder to use the pilots will.
The DPA foundation is cracked and the building plan hasn't been permitted. You can't create a new union from scratch overnight after firing every ALPA volunteer (The DPA Clean House Doctrine) and employee and magically have it up and running on day 2. I know it doesn't matter for you as you already think that no volunteer can think for himself and is controlled by Herndon. That's the insulting part.You claim it's not about the local guys and then say they are all under mind control.

You see hate? Stop looking in the mirror.

Last edited by hitimefurl; 09-04-2013 at 09:21 AM. Reason: words don't spell right
Old 09-04-2013 | 09:10 AM
  #138808  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
This hints that the 320 airframe life extension comes with part of this. Not a bad thing!

It does not remove the possibility of them replacing the older 757s, though. Reality, johnso!
Except that's what 100 737-900ERs are for!!! Reality Clamp!!!

And yes I know the 737-900ER pays less. So let's talk about that.

Ask yourself folks, would you want the A321/739 to pay equal to a B767-300 if it meant it could give another pilot group who does NOT have WB jets a WB argument?

IOW, if we merge with say....Alaska.....could an arbitrator consider a 737-900 the same as a B767? I mean, if Delta ALPA considers a 737-900ER equal to a 767-300ER, then what does that do for us in an arbitrated ISL situation?
Old 09-04-2013 | 09:15 AM
  #138809  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Except that's what 100 737-900ERs are for!!! Reality Clamp!!!

And yes I know the 737-900ER pays less. So let's talk about that.

Ask yourself folks, would you want the A321/739 to pay equal to a B767-300 if it meant it could give another pilot group who does NOT have WB jets a WB argument?

IOW, if we merge with say....Alaska.....could an arbitrator consider a 737-900 the same as a B767? I mean, if Delta ALPA considers a 737-900ER equal to a 767-300ER, then what does that do for us in an arbitrated ISL situation?
The 739 is coming to replace 757s, 763s (!!), and early gen 320s. That's a lot more than 100 airplanes. It will be interesting (and critical) to see if the 320 airframe life extension is part of this deal.

The 321 is 20,000 lbs heavier than the 739 and carries more people than the 757. It should pay more than the 739, logically (I just gave tsquare an aneurysm). That will also put us in a better position given an AS merger.
Old 09-04-2013 | 09:16 AM
  #138810  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Got no idea. Given it's range, weight and appearance, it looks to be the glider the 777 is or better.
Very true. They didn't MD-11 the 787's wing and control surfaces, haha.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices