|
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 1497479)
The 900 already goes to ILM. RJs are losing a lot of flying to mainline. Which is a beautiful thing. Cities like ILM, TRI, CRW etc that haven't seen mainline service in over a decade have had seen mainline return.
The increase of 76 seaters clouds the view of many from seeing the significant increase of mainline flying the 717 will bring. The large RJ expansion will only serve to put further downward pressure on mainline wages. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1497231)
No it didn't. Which was the problem.
I'm still not 100% sure I like some aspects of this LOA, and I definitely think we should have spent a little time getting to know it before a MEMRAT validation. But what you said is incorrect, and it goes to the heart of the matter: there was no guarantee of 316 slots. There was just a requirement to maintain that level in order to maintain beyond Japan codeshares. Which weren't all that numerous. I'll leave it to everyone to judge for themselves whether this LOA is good enough in terms of new protections, but there is no doubt that we really didn't have anything of any significance protecting NRT flying under the previous language. The problem I see is that this LOA might lower the bar on our share of the flying, and perhaps offer opportunities to sign up for new codeshares to fund the loss. The 100 seat restrictions to China/Taiwan/Korea that Johnso mentioned are ludicrous. How often would we have anything near 100 pax connecting on a partner? It's important to remember this if people are going to tout protections they think exists in our Section 1. Carl |
|
Surprised anyone is thinking used Porsche when the new C7 is so nice.
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog....3---01-opt.jpg Excuse the ugly base wheels. With the Z51 package no run of the mill Porsche can hang. Reasonable payment, insurance and bullet proof reliability. My theory on european brands in general is that they do not put sufficient r&d into durability testing. BMW has admitted as much with their press on the upcoming Toyota tie up. Porsche's emphasis has been SUVs and sedans fformore than a decade now. The Cayman is cool and reliable, but twice what a faster, beteer looking and more sustainable C7 is options considered. |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1497434)
Is that the turbo body carrera, aren't those pretty rare?
My German mistress has skinny hips. Not a widebody. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1497546)
Surprised anyone is thinking used Porsche when the new C7 is so nice.
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog....3---01-opt.jpg Excuse the ugly base wheels. With the Z51 package no run of the mill Porsche can hang. Reasonable payment, insurance and bullet proof reliability. My theory on european brands in general is that they do not put sufficient r&d I into durability testing. BMW has admitted as much with their press on the upcoming Toyota tie up. Porsche's emphasis has been SUVs and sedans fformore than a decade now. The Cayman is cool and reliable, but twice what a faster, beteer looking and more sustainable C7 is options considered. |
Nonrevving with the family the other day for a 3+30 hr flight - we're assigned 4 coach seats (no big surprise there). As I'm passing thru F/C, I see two UAL pilots sitting there in uniform. Too late to get in a question to the A-line or gate agent as they're closing the door behind me. Anybody know of a situation where this makes sense? Does United DH pilots in F/C as a policy? I didn't want to go medieval on anybody when there is a rational explanation, but this still has me wondering.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-conte...5ch1o2_250.gif |
Originally Posted by Roadkill
(Post 1497487)
Regarding the Porsche... my Dad had a 928 when I was in college and later. I enjoyed driving it, a bit. It cost a lot to maintain. When I was 20 I thought it made me look pretty cool, and I sure drove it around at the extremes of poor judgement and risk management.
However, in all honesty... my Toyota truck is just as enjoyable to drive, particularly if there is a bit of dirt to be managed, has never broken down, has cost me about $4000 in repairs at 160,000 miles, beats anyone off the line at the green light when required, lets me carry stuff around when I need. And as someone over 40 with a family, I have to say... I look a hell of a lot cooler pulling up in a truck than a Porsche. That's why I have a truck too! Hard to pull a boat with a 911. Four wheelers don't drive themselves to the sand dunes at Pismo beach. If I tried putting a yard of gravel in the 911 it would be difficult to shovel it into a wheel barrel. I can do most of my own work on all my vehicles. Maintenance isn't too bad when your not afraid to get bloody knuckles. A 911 is a toy. I wanted a convertible. I bought the newest one I could afford. She's 17 years old and cheaper than a new Kia. Bar, saw the new corvette yesterday. What a bada$$ looking car!!! |
I've looked at the Corvette. It looks great. But, as soon as it's two or three years old, it looks tired. You just look like a guy driving an MD-88.
|
Guys,
Thanks for the postings on the 911. As some of you know, I have been a long time car guy, I have a big, fully outfitted shop and a bunch of storage. The reason for the initial question is that I have decided to thin some of my herd of muscle cars and hot rods now that some of the softness in the market is gone. I have been checking out what kind of final toy car I have to play around with. I am a GM/toyota guy mostly and have many examples of the best of each marque (except for the supra tt). The toy box I have is relatively inexpensive to maintain and I do most of it myself (I built most of them myself). The 911 is a possibility as I thin out the others, I'm still pondering. I don't need another car. If I got one it would be a want. I don't want to stifle the discussion in any way and thank you all for the PMs and responses. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands