![]() |
|
Originally Posted by pilotc90a
(Post 1573224)
I have to ask a quick question: why do some on the tail-end of our seniority list have a category of "newb" and others have an actual category? "ATL320B" for instance?
It was also interesting to note one name in particular... a former FAA POI that cause so much discomfort prior to the merger... now he is one of us... |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1573210)
I disagree. I don't think the past blowouts were on anybody's mind in this game. This more reminded me of the Super Bowl where the Patriots were going for the perfect season.. and all the hype that went along with that... and little brother took them to the woodshed. And there is no way I would rather lose to the Brady Bunch. Ever.
|
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 1573227)
I know the individual you speak of, elaborate....I've always found him to be above board and easy to get along with. Thks
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1573198)
But let's be honest. There is plenty of abuse in flight pay loss program.
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1573199)
Don't kid yourself. There are plenty of cushy gigs for guys who don't like to fly at DALPA.
|
Originally Posted by pilotc90a
(Post 1573224)
I have to ask a quick question: why do some on the tail-end of our seniority list have a category of "newb" and others have an actual category? "ATL320B" for instance?
.. |
Originally Posted by pilotc90a
(Post 1573224)
...why do some on the tail-end of our seniority list have a category of "newb" and others have an actual category? "ATL320B" for instance?
|
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 1573251)
I suspect the new hires without a category are flow through pilots who have been held back at their current airline.
Im a compass guy and that's what Icrew has for me but then shows futute category ATL717 |
AE closed out 2 hours ago mannnn.... where's them results?? ;)
I'm hoping for some more of that seahawk-crazy-way-better-than-hoped-for-ness. |
Originally Posted by CGfalconHerc
(Post 1573179)
That first blown snap for a safety put the sliver of doubt in the offense's head and awakened the "ghosts of blowouts past". The Denver defense actually held for the first quarter, and if Manning could have produced a drive it could have been 5-7 at the end of the first.
Just sux for the Broncos..a blowout like that refutes the record setting season they had. I guess Manning did set a Super Bowl record for the most completions..unfortunately 3 of them were to the Seahawks. As a lifelong Bronco fan having grown up in Colorado with the Orange Crush, it would have been better to lose to the Pats and regroup for next year. Now, all I can hope for is plenty of TV coverage of the Seahawks returning to Seattle on a Delta 76.. Rant over..I need to go find a happy place. first http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view3/115...da-smash-o.gif second, find an alumnus from the team who beat you and torment them. if you cannot find someone then PM me and i have an alternative named 80ktsclamp you can use. its not a healthy way to handle unless feeling good = being healthy. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1573198)
Some do, no doubt.
But let's be honest. There is plenty of abuse in flight pay loss program. If you have a specific allegation to make, I would immediately call your local representative so it can be addressed. If you can't get satisfaction from him, then call another. Nu |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands